Aside from current events and geopolitics, we here at Coming Anarchy also dabble in our fair share of other topics including geography, history, law, religion and sociology. One topic we have occasionally covered has been weapons and technology. So, to combine several of our favorite themes, I’d like to bring you a short history of two of my favorite historical weapons with some surprising details you may not know.
Ever heard of the StG 44? Probably not. Heard of the AK-47? You bet. But the StG 44 is actually the first assault rifle which all subsequent weapons were based on: the AK, G3, M16, current M4 etc. And as usual, it was the Germans who led the way.
I recently came across this post at War is Boring, which is a fine blog, but it repeated one of the most annoying, ill informed and simply incorrect stock journalistic phrases regarding the AK-47.
“No single weapon — save the atomic bomb — has had as profound an impact on modern warfare and global instability,” Larry Kahaner wrote in his biography of the weapon.
Granted, he was quoting someone else and its something so frequently repeated that few question it, but the quote itself is simply incorrect. The AK-47, while a Russian weapon, is in fact a modified version of a German weapon, which is the actual first assault rifle that revolutionized small arms and warfare, the StG 44 (Sturmgewehr 44). As in so many other cases, the Germans were quick to realize the failure and faults of past methods of warfare and weapons and masterfully designed new ones. Despite having lost WWII, the Germans were technologically far beyond the rest of the world at the time.
As Wikipedia notes, “While the StG44 had less range and power than the more powerful infantry rifles of the day, Wehrmacht studies had shown that most combat engagements occurred at less than 300 m with the majority within 200 m. Full-power rifle cartridges were excessive for the vast majority of uses for the average soldier.” Moreover, the small capcity and low rate of fire of bolt action rifles was simply inadequate.

Those interested in more of the details can read more at the linked Wikipedia article. On a side note, this author recently looked at an authentic StG 44 at a gun show. Its price? $22,000 dollars! This is due in part to its being antique but largely due to ridiculous US restrictions on automatic weapons. Anyone interested in purchasing one would likely need to sell their car(s) first, or perhaps the proverbial arm and a leg.
Lastly, unbeknownst to most people, Germany today is actually the world’s third largest exporter of arms. Specifically, the southwestern state of Baden-Wuerttemberg (where I lived for many years) excells in firearms being home to Mauser, Heckler and Koch and Walther.
Those of you familiar with small arms, WWII, or just Call of Duty are certaintly familiar with the infamous PPSH 41, a Russian sub machine gun. And yet, as with so many Russian things, they were not in fact ‘Russian’ but adaptations or copies of other countries’ weapons. There are numerous examples of this but I’d like to focus on the Russian PPSH-41.
After the Winter War, in which the Russians were massacred by little old Finland, the Russians quickly adopted a Finnish weapon which had proven so effective against them, the Suomi.

Indeed, the Russians had realized that such weapons were superior for close quarters combat in the forests of Finland or in urban areas. From Wikipedia:
The Suomi KP/-31 is regarded by many as one of the most successful submachine guns of World War II and it was so successful that many of its features (including the 71-round drum magazine) were later copied and adopted by the Soviets for their PPD-40 and PPSh-41 submachine guns.[2] The accuracy compared to the mass-produced PPSh-41 was superior however, thanks in part to a noticeably longer barrel, with the same rate of fire and the equally large magazine capacity. The major failing of the Suomi-KP was its high production costs.
Originals of either weapon are hard to come by and extremely expensive. However, partially rebuilt models are available for around $600 chambered in the original 9mm parabellum (the cartridge being a German invention of course). However, the changes made to accomodate US laws take some of the fun away (increased barrel length and being semi automatic).
If you’ve enjoyed this historical weapons related thread, do chime in in the comments since it’s not part of our usual programming.

Comments to this entry
chuck
January 20, 2010
10:33 pm
Speaking of German weapons genius - there's a much better example of a weapon way ahead of it's time: the MP-40. The familiar machine-gun of the many war films, it's the prototype of all current urban weapons - where range and accuracy isn't all that important, while size and maximum rate of fire are paramount.
Munro Ferguson
January 20, 2010
11:10 pm
Glenn
January 20, 2010
11:23 pm
Chirol
January 20, 2010
11:28 pm
As for the origin of the SKS, my personal knowledge is that it was becoming the standard infantry weapon of teh Soviets when the AK was developed. After that, the SKS was quickly dropped for the AK. Wikipedia notes the SKS was based on the AVS-36 which was quickly dropped due to several problems.
Chirol
January 21, 2010
12:08 am
Completely agree about the MP40 and would also add the MG42 to the list, being what the US M60 SAW and current German MG4 was based off of as well (if I'm not mistaken).
Bob Pulliam
January 21, 2010
12:14 am
The Germans produced some wonderful weapons, but never intelligently exercised the central command authority necessary to concentrate production on specific, superior weapons and strategies. Hence the too late Sturmgewehr-44, the too late ME262, the superior but over-complicated tanks, the lack of a stategic bomber, and on and on.
Lexington Green
January 21, 2010
12:36 am
Klaus
January 21, 2010
1:14 am
Jarhead
January 21, 2010
2:03 am
M Brueschke
January 21, 2010
3:50 am
Savage Model 99 brought the detachable magazine. Fedorov Avtomat came in 6.5mm and had a detachable magazine. Ribeyrolle 1918 had a detachable magazine, intermediate round and was accurate out to about 400 meters. The M1918 BAR was a larger full auto heavy assault rifle.
Oh and the M-1 Carbine should be in the list too.
Remington's Model 8/81 had a number of features that were taken for both the StG-44 and AK-47.
Chirol
January 21, 2010
1:08 pm
Jarhead: Great story but it breaks my heart! I cant believe you blew it up!
M Brueschke: I don't deny it incorporated elements of other weapons. No development, weapons related or otherwise, occurs in a vacuum. Nevertheless, the StG 44 was the big leap forward, so to say, away from classic rifles into something totally new. This was its importance.
As for the BAR, I think everyone agrees it seriously sucked. I wouldn't personally classify it as an assault rifle as it suffered from trying to use 'new' technology in an old way, clear in its design. There was no vision of making a different type of gun, whose purpose more accurately reflected a new type of warfare. And yes, the M1 rocks too. Gotta get me one of those one of these days.
Lexington Green
January 21, 2010
5:40 pm
SJPONeill
January 21, 2010
7:12 pm
I Think that the original quote is wrong anyway - while the AK is common as sand in the desert, if it had not existed, the gaps would still have been filled by one or many other small arms. I'd propose that it is the RPG that has had a greater impact when you consider the quantity of $ expended to try and counter it and the fear/awe in which it is regarded by so many troops. In 2005, A Marine described it to me as the scariest weapon around "...just slow enough you can see it coming, just fast enough that you can't do much about it; accurate enough to hit the target but just inaccurate enough that it might get you by accident..."
Thomas
January 22, 2010
12:27 am
dj
January 22, 2010
4:12 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federov_Avtomat
Phil
January 25, 2010
1:08 am
dfg
January 27, 2010
4:36 pm
For army - not the ebst weapon, for rebels - right on. No cleaning, little damage