Sometimes, movies inspire thought on public policy, and the film Avatar made me reconsider one outlandish doomsday scenario: how human society should react to an alien invasion.
![]()
Arriving with a whimper, not a bang.
Typically, Hollywood films portray alien invasion as either (1) a horde of invisible spies in our midst, or, (2) a sudden attack of overwhelming force. Avatar portrays a third scenario—an alien planet is first colonized by business interests, protected not by a government or state military but by private mercenaries, and who generally use their overwhelming power in reactive mode, which is, objectively, disproportionate and excessive.
The Avatar scenario feels more believable. Throughout human history, conquerors are typically prefaced by scouts, diplomats, and exploratory militant missions, while colonization is typically carried out by independent pioneers or merchant adventurers. Throughout the film, I felt that certain aspects of the plot felt familiar, and that they were taken from the experience of human history, when primitive societies have come into contact with technologically advanced people.
It feels prudent, then, to prepare for an alien invasion not by watching Independence Day and getting pumped for a gung ho, all-or-nothing last stand, but by looking at the experience of wars and empires through history. Consider the experience of some major nations that survived colonization or attempted colonization:
- Alexander’s invasion looks in retrospect like a massive and sudden slaughter, but his was a reactive invasion that only followed after centuries of Persian subjugation of the divided Greek city states. Similarly, in the struggle between Rome v.s. Carthage, the Phoenician superpower held domination over the Mediterranean Sea for centuries and had the power to invade the Italian territory of Rome when tensions flared, and only through steady growth and perseverance did Rome finally win and destroy Carthage. It could take centuries to beat back an alien force, but it may be possible through adoption of new technology over time.
- In India, the corporate interests of London preceded British Imperial authority by playing the various Rajs and warlords of against one another, slowly taking power nationwide when that was easier than propping up a feckless leader, with the population surviving but impoverished. It is possible that an alien invasion could try to play off the major world powers against each other by rewarding some countries with amazing technology in exchange for mining or colonization rights, even of common resources. How could and would the world react if, say, Australia was rewarded with futuristic technologies in exchange for coastal facilities that harvested ocean water?
- In China, colonial interests were able to dominate the coast but found it difficult to penetrate the interior, and benefited by pushing opium on the public, both financially, and in subduing the locals. An alien species could take control of key centers of power and subjugate the population with drugs, food, or entertainment—probably a lot easier than subjugating with force and facing rebellions and sabotage.
- In Japan, when faced with technologically advanced invaders, modernizers pushed out the old government and rapidly modernized by adopting both the methods and technology of the West, later starting its own regional empire. This is the most promising example from world history that shows how we could learn from would-be colonizers or invaders, while remembering that hubris shouldn’t get the better of us. Also, Japan was fortunate that it quickly quashed all rebellions and those loyal to the old order, while Korea, which had the potential to follow Japan’s path, was thwarted by infighting.
Of course, there is much to make us fatalistic or cynical. The Mongols who galloped across Eurasia slaughtered the populations of sieged cities, the colonists in North America and Australia who obliterated the indigenous population with force and disease, and the Moriori who were exterminated without pity by Mauri invaders are just some examples. But I think many examples suggest that an alien invasion would not necessarily be game over for human civilization. Many societies that exist today did so through a social Darwin-esque survival of the fittest. Our own history teaches us much of how to proactively react.

Comments to this entry
spandrell
December 20, 2009
1:22 pm
david
December 20, 2009
4:11 pm
And most of the native tribes that got wiped out never even met the white man. Disease traveled much faster than the colonists. The interior was wiped out long before settlers arrived. Current estimates are that 95%+ of the deaths were due to disease.
Chris Swanson
December 20, 2009
5:11 pm
Sheesh, I hope my sentence there made sense. I just woke up, so I'm not sure. :D
M Brueschke
December 20, 2009
7:33 pm
Of course my view is biased, I'm from an American Indian Reservation that had a long history of trade and warfare with the United States (Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation) that then became a homesteaded reservation, so I've seen how half-breeds, full bloods and homesteaders lived together. Lakota culture is still strong and the tribes never lost their oral histories, so I'm not sure where the sense they were "obliterated" comes from, because its not a historical reality.
kurt9
December 20, 2009
7:34 pm
There is also the synthetic biology equivalent to this scenario. Only in this case, the source of the"infestation" is not extraterrestrial. The synthetic biology can be made to grow houses,cities, and entire manufacturing infrastructures, all based on bio-fabrication rather than mechanical processes. All of peoples' personal and entertainment needs are met by the synthetic biology "system". This system can also fabricate the pheromones and other behavior-altering compounds such as to make the people happy and, more importantly, make it such that they do not interfere with the aspirations of those who have bigger dreams than them. After all, the whole purpose of this "infestation" is to create a society so that transhumanists and other large dreamers are free to pursue their aspirations free from all of the arseholes that would f*ck with us today. This is the potential of synthetic biology and why I am so interested in it.
I am into the biological paradigm. I do not believe that "dry" (Drexlerian) nanotechnology is possible. I am interested in the synthetic biological equivalent to it.
Thomas
December 20, 2009
8:11 pm
The truth is that any sentient life form that we are likely to encounter, whether in an exploration, exploitation or invasion scenario will be alien to us in almost every way and speculation about their motives and methods can only go so far until we actually meet them.
Chris
December 20, 2009
8:17 pm
But how about this psychological question: In Independence Day, humanity unites under a larger, common threat. Would our planet ever actually unite in such a cooperation? With some people fearing the Rapture, the misconceived 'Mayan' doomsday, or simply their own lives, what reactions can we expect from a world where paradigms are as diversified as they are? How will each culture respond to such an invasion?
With everyone focused on the invaders, who will see the scenario as an umbrella for further crime and chaos?
When the Trade Center towers fell on September 11, there were people in the towers who rose as heros in their efforts to lead their fellow humans to safety. Many also saw fit to jump to their deaths.
I guess, answer this question if you can: How would you personally react?
@David: I'm glad you mentioned the small pox theory. I've been told that before and it's great to see it debunked.
Chris
December 20, 2009
8:28 pm
That is another thing to think about. Aliens have always been pictured with technology similar to our own, although slightly more advanced.
But with our current advancements in bio-engineering, who's to say these aliens wouldn't be light years ahead of us in such a technology? Would we really be fighting fire power with fire power, or fighting something that we've only just begun to dream of?
The way a statue is a reflection of the human body, what is a computer but a reflection of our mind, programming a reflection of our thought processes, and what is DNA but a programming language of its own?
McKellar
December 20, 2009
10:43 pm
Roy Berman
December 21, 2009
2:38 am
Many western tribes survive, but most of the tribes in the areas of the original colonies, i.e. the Northeast, were in fact completely obliterated, and the survivors often relocated to the West (a process that under modern international law is called "ethnic cleansing"). I grew up on a street called Watching Avenue in New Jersey, less than an hour away from Manhattan. A couple of hours to the south is Delaware. There are any number of place names from the original inhabitants, but VERY few native Americans remain in the region. Of course now that being a native includes legal benefits and not just discrimination, a lot of people have started identifying/registering as natives even in these states, but the numbers and cultural impact are miniscule compared to the West. I've literally never met a single Native American in my home state.
"When the Trade Center towers fell on September 11, there were people in the towers who rose as heros in their efforts to lead their fellow humans to safety. Many also saw fit to jump to their deaths."
I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that those who jumped to their deaths were above the fire line and had no hope of escape.
Chris
December 21, 2009
3:24 am
If there was an alien invasion, how would people react if they decide that they're "above the fire line"?
spandrell
December 21, 2009
5:56 am
Chris
December 21, 2009
6:33 am
kurt9
December 21, 2009
6:28 pm
I don't watch much SF on the tely. I occasional do read SF novels, like the aforementioned "War against the Chtorr". However, I am familiar with the concept of organic spacecraft, because I'm familiar with the idea of organic buildings, houses, and what not all, all the way up to organic space colonies (Dyson Trees). I became familiar with this idea because we used to talk about this concept at Alcor meetings in the late 80's. I am into this stuff because I think a true advanced synthetic biology will make this possible and it is so ever desirable (an "organic" technological civilization of this sort is VERY appealing to me).
Thomas,
Of course you are correct.
The thing to keep in mind about aliens is that they are alien. Like how the most important thing to keep in mind about the Chinese is that they are Chinese. The comment about aliens comes from Gregory Benford, the physicist and sometimes SF writer. The comment about the Chinese comes from the East Asia business environment professor I had at Thunderbird.
Munro Ferguson
December 21, 2009
6:38 pm
If the threat was defined and large enough and no nation could find an angle of advantage (i.e. one country "makes a deal" with the invaders) then I think we'd unite to a degree, especially the more developed and powerful nations.
I agree with Thomas, the likelyhood of et life resembling us biologically much less emotionally and socially seems pretty remote.
Chris I can suggest a good novel that deals with human kind settling a new planet and finding themselves up against a "resistant force" with zero technology. It's written by Larry Niven , Steven Barns and Jerry Pournell and it's titled The Legacy of Herot.
I have yet to see this movie but it sounds like a very beautifully done screed on the evils of western conquest. Which is a pretty tired subject.
andrew
December 21, 2009
8:16 pm
Chris
December 21, 2009
10:10 pm
@Munro: Thanks for the recommendation. I'll check it out. I practically live at the library.
@Andrew: Depends on if Obama's in office. Great questions. Would civil war break out within highly developed countries as government officials debate what decisions to make?
M-Bone
December 21, 2009
10:28 pm
Watchmen (or Star Trek for that matter)
Scifi novel featuring humanity up against an incomprehensibly alien enemy (and that actually deals with the strategic implications) - Starship Troopers
"Naw, the best scenario for alien "invasion" is an alien ecological infestation"
Lovecraft, "The Colour out of Space"
spandrell
December 21, 2009
11:36 pm
chris:there's ways of doing it. Didn't work bad in the US after cleansing the indians. Nor for the greeks and turks. Doing fine they are.
Lexington Green
December 22, 2009
12:10 am
Any alien life that had the capacity to cross interstellar space would be so far beyond us in terms of its capabilities that we would probably be mutually incomprehensible to each other.
Assume for a moment that Ray Kurzweil is on the right track (I am not so sure, but assume it). If so, humans, us, as we will be in a century will be incomprenensible to us as we are now. By the time our descendants could bridge interstellar distances, we ourselves would have become something totally unknowable in current terms.
If something that advanced wanter our planet, it would treat us like insect pests and we would never know what hit us.
See the classic story, The Screwfly Solution.
M-Bone
December 22, 2009
12:28 am
That reminds me, "The Music of Erich Zann" is the one that carries the tone of utter alien incomprehensibility the best and the one that does it with the firm anthropological eye is "At the Mountains of Madness". "Colour" is the total package though.
The problem with writing incomprehensible aliens , however, is that the very act of writing them makes them comprehensible. Anything we really encounter is likely to transcend our powers of imagination.
Chris
December 22, 2009
12:44 am
Roy Berman
December 22, 2009
1:39 am
This is a bit like the plot of the recent "Torchwood: Children of Earth" series the BBC did recently, except it was done a as a threat and not in exchange for anything good. It was actually very good, I recommend it.
SPOILERS
Aliens came to Earth asking for a percentage of the Earth's population of children without explaining why, and in the end it turns out that the psychic energy of human children is a narcotic to them.
Roy Berman
December 22, 2009
1:41 am
Technically ethnic cleansing is just forcing people to move, not actually killing them off. What Hitler did was genocide. Both crimes against humanity, but the latter is obviously an order of magnitude worse.
Chris
December 22, 2009
2:35 am
spandrell
December 22, 2009
6:03 am
You're always free go to back to Britain and live a life free of guilt (and the moral superiority it gives you)
Chris
December 22, 2009
7:22 am
spandrell
December 22, 2009
9:23 am
Chris
December 22, 2009
10:02 am
andrew
December 22, 2009
8:21 pm
spandrell
December 23, 2009
8:26 am
But maybe I'm assuming you're a white american while you're not.
Chris
December 23, 2009
9:28 am
If ethnic cleansing is peace for generations, then what is there to feel guilty about?
stevelaudig
December 26, 2009
1:34 am
Gab
January 5, 2010
3:34 pm
It's only science fiction, I know.