I have long felt that mapping political cultural geography by using election results is a key element of political science that has long been ignored. Academia seems to dismiss it as too simple, and pundits tend to rely on it as the holy grail in explaining everything (remember the nonsense about “Red” states v.s. “Blue” states in the United States over the past decade?) That means that bloggers get to do most of the real analysis, and perhaps the best work on this has been done by Strange Maps — the entire set of their geographic reviews are worth noting once again, what with a recent map showing the regional breakdown of election results in Denmark.
* The 2007 presidential election in France saw votes for the Socialist candidate in the west, particularly the southwest, and it was suggested that this reflected the region’s long tradition of dissent previously seen as the Cathar heresy in the Middle Ages, Huguenot protestantism thereafter, and anticlericalism, antimonarchism and eventually modern socialism.
* The 2004 election in Ukraine saw a very stark divide between the pro-European western half of the country voted for Yushchenko, the pro-Russian eastern half for Yanukovich, along dividing lines that closely reflected the borders of the Kievan Rus, the medieval Slavic ancestors of Russia and Ukraine.
* The 2007 legislative elections in Poland showed that, despite massive displacements of Poles, Germans and others peoples in the 20th century, the electoral results nevertheless eerily correspond with an old imperial border that has been erased from history since 1918.
* Recent local elections in Denmark suggest that, despite the harmonization of historic linguistic divides in Denmark, a cultural divide remains that is reflected in election results.
* In the American South, there remains a strong correlation between areas with high cotton production in the 1860s to the counties that voted for Obama in the 2008 presidential election — or as the author notes, they went from picking cotton to picking presidents!
Search
Recent Comments
- Jupiter on Interview with Edward Luttwak
- tdaxp on Interview with Edward Luttwak
- Scott on Interview with Edward Luttwak
- physical map of india in history - CASTE SYSTEM – CASTE SYSTEM on History of Tokyo subway lines map
- Michael on History of Tokyo subway lines map
- Abelard Lindsey on Genocide in Sudan, Part 2? The Worst Case Scenario for Southern Sudan Independence
- theslittyeye on Genocide in Sudan, Part 2? The Worst Case Scenario for Southern Sudan Independence
- spandrell on Genocide in Sudan, Part 2? The Worst Case Scenario for Southern Sudan Independence
- Aceface on Genocide in Sudan, Part 2? The Worst Case Scenario for Southern Sudan Independence
- spandrell on Genocide in Sudan, Part 2? The Worst Case Scenario for Southern Sudan Independence
Archives
Travelogues
-
Chirol's Travels to Tunisia
A short trip through Tunisia -
Curzon's Journey Across the Far East
Viet Nam, China and Japan -
Chirol's Syria Diary
Syria, Lebanon, Israel and Palestine -
Curzon's Anatolian Dispatches
Around Turkey in March 2005 -
Younghusband's Iran Diary
Three weeks in the Islamic Republic -
Chirol's Ottoman Odyssey
Turkey and Cyprus -
Chirol's Balkan Memories
Croatia and Bosnia in 2002
-
Chirol's Travels to Tunisia
Pingback: Mapas polĂticos
If Glenn Beck were to utter the words “They went from picking cotton to picking presidents,” the progressive blogosphere would go six kinds of ape shit.
Now what was really cool was the comment pointing out that the cotton producing areas correspond to Cretaceous era shorelines that deposited the rich soil that supported the cotton.
http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/330-from-pickin-cotton-to-pickin-presidents/#comment-77757
So while it’s obviously an example of over-determinism so absurd that Jared Diamond would laugh to say that Obama was elected president because of coastal deposits 100 million years ago, the layers of causality throughout history are quite fascinating indeed.
The map of Poland is really amazing. If I’m not mistaken, the northern and western parts of Poland created from what was Prussia and Pomerania were populated by Poles forced to move west by the Soviets to make Poland into a better buffer state. Did that have anything to do with their voting patterns or is it just proximity to Germany?
I always thought that the electoral map form Mexico’s 2006 presidential election was interesting:
http://electionresources.org/mx/maps/president.php?election=2006
It shows a fairly clear north-divide, with the northern states going for Calderon the winner (over the extreme leftist former mayor of Mexico Lopez-Obredor [AMLO]). AMLO was fairly distinctly anti-trade, which I think explains much of the divide.