Strange-Mapping Political Culture with Election Results

I have long felt that mapping political cultural geography by using election results is a key element of political science that has long been ignored. Academia seems to dismiss it as too simple, and pundits tend to rely on it as the holy grail in explaining everything (remember the nonsense about “Red” states v.s. “Blue” states in the United States over the past decade?) That means that bloggers get to do most of the real analysis, and perhaps the best work on this has been done by Strange Maps — the entire set of their geographic reviews are worth noting once again, what with a recent map showing the regional breakdown of election results in Denmark.
* The 2007 presidential election in France saw votes for the Socialist candidate in the west, particularly the southwest, and it was suggested that this reflected the region’s long tradition of dissent previously seen as the Cathar heresy in the Middle Ages, Huguenot protestantism thereafter, and anticlericalism, antimonarchism and eventually modern socialism.
* The 2004 election in Ukraine saw a very stark divide between the pro-European western half of the country voted for Yushchenko, the pro-Russian eastern half for Yanukovich, along dividing lines that closely reflected the borders of the Kievan Rus, the medieval Slavic ancestors of Russia and Ukraine.
* The 2007 legislative elections in Poland showed that, despite massive displacements of Poles, Germans and others peoples in the 20th century, the electoral results nevertheless eerily correspond with an old imperial border that has been erased from history since 1918.
* Recent local elections in Denmark suggest that, despite the harmonization of historic linguistic divides in Denmark, a cultural divide remains that is reflected in election results.
* In the American South, there remains a strong correlation between areas with high cotton production in the 1860s to the counties that voted for Obama in the 2008 presidential election — or as the author notes, they went from picking cotton to picking presidents!

About Curzon

Lord George Nathaniel Curzon (1859 - 1925) entered the British House of Commons as a Conservative MP in 1886, where he served as undersecretary of India and Foreign Affairs. He was appointed Viceroy of India at the turn of the 20th century where he delineated the North West Frontier Province, ordered a military expedition to Tibet, and unsuccessfully tried to partition the province of Bengal during his six-year tenure. Curzon served as Leader of the House of Lords in Prime Minister Lloyd George's War Cabinet and became Foreign Secretary in January 1919, where his most famous act was the drawing of the Curzon Line between a new Polish state and Russia. His publications include Russia in Central Asia (1889) and Persia and the Persian Question (1892). In real life, "Curzon" is a US citizen from the East Coast who has been a financial analyst, freelance translator, and university professor; he is currently on assignment in Tokyo.
This entry was posted in General and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Strange-Mapping Political Culture with Election Results

  1. Pingback: Mapas polĂ­ticos

  2. Thomas says:

    If Glenn Beck were to utter the words “They went from picking cotton to picking presidents,” the progressive blogosphere would go six kinds of ape shit.

  3. Roy Berman says:

    Now what was really cool was the comment pointing out that the cotton producing areas correspond to Cretaceous era shorelines that deposited the rich soil that supported the cotton.

    http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/330-from-pickin-cotton-to-pickin-presidents/#comment-77757

    So while it’s obviously an example of over-determinism so absurd that Jared Diamond would laugh to say that Obama was elected president because of coastal deposits 100 million years ago, the layers of causality throughout history are quite fascinating indeed.

  4. Bob Harrison says:

    The map of Poland is really amazing. If I’m not mistaken, the northern and western parts of Poland created from what was Prussia and Pomerania were populated by Poles forced to move west by the Soviets to make Poland into a better buffer state. Did that have anything to do with their voting patterns or is it just proximity to Germany?

  5. ElamBend says:

    I always thought that the electoral map form Mexico’s 2006 presidential election was interesting:
    http://electionresources.org/mx/maps/president.php?election=2006

    It shows a fairly clear north-divide, with the northern states going for Calderon the winner (over the extreme leftist former mayor of Mexico Lopez-Obredor [AMLO]). AMLO was fairly distinctly anti-trade, which I think explains much of the divide.