Entry details

Younghusband
Author

Younghusband

Date

October 2nd, 2009

Tags

,

Comments

4 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Think again: Why authoritarian regimes like social media

Evgeny Morozov (who also blogs at FP) has been a long-time critic of the notion that the internet is ultimately a liberalizing force in international politics. His contrarian views on tech in authoritarian regimes are always thought-provoking. In the TEDtalk below, Morozov lays out his case against “cyber-utopianism” and “iPod liberalism”. I would also recommend reading the comments which offer more information and some contrary views.

Autobiographical note: As many may know, my graduate thesis was on Chinese-Japanese competition over energy resources. Before switching to that topic at the last minute, I was working on the use of the internet and blogs by Iranian mullahs and political activists. Imagine my sense of regret at the missed opportunity during the Twitter revolution in Iran earlier this year.

Comments to this entry

Jack UH
October 2, 2009
8:11 pm
Rebecca MacKinnon has done some reporting on "cybertarianism" in China. It's an interesting look at how the Chinese Communist Party uses varying levels of control and pressure to guide (or manipulate depending on perspective) online dialogue and news.

http://rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/
SEEROV
October 5, 2009
3:26 am
Out of all the weapons and platforms DoD and the defense establishment ever created, the Internet is by far the most important for the defense of America's way of life. Because of this I'm positive that we'll be hearing more calls for Internet censorship in the near future. Some of these calls will be packaged like this Ted Talk.
Ralph Hitchens
October 5, 2009
7:22 pm
I honor Morozov as well for his contrarian but eminently sensible view on the present (and persistent) manufactured hysteria over cyber security. URL -- http://www.bostonreview.net/BR34.4/morozov.php. (Hope it's still up.)
Younghusband
October 10, 2009
1:16 am
@Seerov: Do you think Morozov is calling for censorship? I think he is just arguing that the openness of the internet is not a guarantee of flourishing liberalism, but can be used for nefarious purposes as well, thus we should watch what we say. Unless you mean that the nefarious among us will manufacture people like Morozov to warn us about speaking our minds for the sake of personal security when it is truly for the security of the state? Ooooh! How matryoshkian! How 5GW!

@Ralph Hitchens: Excellent article sir.