Entry details

Chirol
Author

Chirol

Date

September 2nd, 2009

Tags

, ,

Comments

6 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Cartoons Again? A Double Standard

Despite years abroad and a love and appreciation of Europe, there are some freedoms that are simply broader in the United States, specifically the first and second amendments. It is therefore with no surprise yet considerable disappointment that I read about the latest cartoon controversy in Europe, this time in reverse.

Dutch to prosecute Arabs over Holocaust cartoon

AMSTERDAM – Dutch prosecutors said Wednesday they will charge an Arab cultural group under hate speech laws for publishing a cartoon that suggests the death of 6 million Jews during World War II is a fabrication.The public prosecutor’s office in the city of Utrecht said the cartoon insults Jews as a group and is therefore an illegal form of discrimination. Prosecutors plan to press charges for “insulting a group and distributing an insulting image.” Spokeswoman Mary Hallebeek said the maximum punishment is a year in jail, but a fine of up to euro4,700 ($6,700) is more likely, given that the charges are against the group. The Dutch arm of the Arab European League said it doesn’t deny the reality of the Holocaust, but published the cartoon on its Web site as an “act of civil disobedience” to highlight a double standard.

[...] The cartoon shows two apparently Jewish men standing near a pile of skeletons with a sign that says “Auswitch,” presumably representing the largest Nazi concentration camp, Auschwitz. One pokes a bone with a stick and says “I don’t think they’re Jews” and the other answers, “We have to get to the six million somehow.”

As ignorant and distasteful as such a cartoon is, there’s clearly nothing illegal about it, at least in a country that truly values freedom of speech such as the United States. It will be interesting to see the unfolding public reaction in the Netherlands, the rest of Europe and from Jewish groups. If anything, having this case thrown out would at least set a good example of tolerating the free speech Europeans claim to cherish.

Comments to this entry

The Sanity Inspector
September 2, 2009
9:18 pm
I hope the point isn't lost, either, that there will be no frothing mobs of angry Jews caused by these cartoons.
Sejo
September 2, 2009
10:39 pm
Nor the embassies in Jerusalem will be assaulted.

I don't know what's happening in The Netherlands: attacks on gay bars from the Muslim youth, and homicides and death threats, even a rich and educated population that chooses to leave its country to settle elesewhere; it seems as if the country in Europe most appreciated for its civil liberties is changing for the worst starting from its social fabric. And similar reports are coming from Scandinavia.
No wonder that parties like Partij voor de Vrijheid gain votes quite everywhere. Maybe we're missing something of the USA experience in the integration of foreign communities, maybe – like some analysts say – it's a different kind of immigration.
Still, I don't think that this new cartoons issue is just a matter of freedom of speech. Not in Europe, where the Shoah has been committed, not in a country that resisted very little to the deportation of its Jewish citizens.
hack
September 2, 2009
10:49 pm
Freedom of speech clearly means something else outside the US, where the concept is applied with a more zealous approach. Canadians and Europeans alike are comfortable with this, and they have the right to set their own bar.

After the first cartoon outrage, no Muslim should rightfully have any problem with this action, and those that do need to be pointed to their own hypocrisy. Allowing such cartoons to continue would be a double standard and an encouragement for immigrants who do not respect the laws of their new land to continue doing so.

(All that presuming the Dutch prosecutor's motivation is based on laws and not on racial preferences, of course...)
James
September 3, 2009
9:05 am
There is a big difference between just drawing a picture of mohammed and drawing a cartoon that attempts to deny the historical fact of the holocaust. I think both should be protected under free speech, but I can sort of understand laws that limit free speech in cases of holocaust denial.

I'm actually a bit intrigued by the claims right wingers are making about Muslim immigrants in Sweden:
http://bnp.org.uk/2009/09/muslim-rape-epidemic-puts-sweden-at-top-of-euro-rape-statistics/
Village Idiot
September 3, 2009
12:28 pm
"...a country that truly values freedom of speech such as the United States"?

The US "truly" values free speech? Fairness Doctrine anyone....
Munro Ferguson
September 3, 2009
10:24 pm
The fairness doctrine hasn't been law for twenty years, and very likely won't be in the foreseeable future given it's political toxicity. Additionally, it was a (unconstitutional I'd opine) regulatory practice and violations didn't land people in criminal court.