Entry details

Curzon
Author

Curzon

Date

June 1st, 2009

Tags

Comments

7 Comments so far.
Add yours.

North Korea, the Next Iraq?

So asks Robert D. Kaplan in his latest dispatch in the Atlantic, which you can read here. Kaplan titles his dispatch with the question “North Korea, the Next Iraq?” but Kaplan’s actually talking more about how North Korea wants the US to protect it from China—a unique perspective and an interesting one at that:

China and Russia rely on North Korea as a buffer state between themselves and the dangerously appealing middle-class, vibrant, pro-American [Curzon: ?] democracy that is South Korea. China, moreover, would face perhaps millions of North Korean refugees streaming across its border were the North Korean regime to crumble. Seeking to stem this possibility, China continues to prop up the buffer state of North Korea. And indeed, without Chinese assistance, Kim’s regime would probably not last long.

Nonetheless, Kim tries to remain feistily independent of China, for while China doesn’t want North Korea to implode catastrophically, China does have designs on North Korea’s territory: It prefers the idea of a Gorbachevian buffer state like Tibet on its northeastern frontier in place of Kim’s erratic totalitarian regime.

China also has good reasons for not wanting to see the kind of North-South Korean conglomerate that might ultimately emerge from collapse. Reunification of the Korean Peninsula would be, to say the least, geopolitically inconvenient to China. Jutting out far from the Asian mainland, the Korean Peninsula commands all maritime traffic in northeastern China and, most importantly, traps in its armpit the Bohai Sea, home to China’s largest offshore oil reserve. Moreover, a unified Korea would likely be nationalistic, with distinctly mixed feelings toward its large neighbors, China and Japan, who have historically sought to control and even occupy it.

And so Kim lives in dread of the Chinese slowly, methodically undermining his regime in a way that will lead to him being replaced—in a palace coup, perhaps—without the implosion of the North Korean state. His only hope is to draw America into direct talks, with Washington implicitly recognizing his regime, so that he can leverage Washington against Beijing. Nuclear tests and missile launches are his own warped way of trying to get the attention of the new Obama Administration. He needs to be enough of a problem that Washington will have no choice but to deal with him directly, rather than merely as one party among several in the multilateral talks that have characterized negotiations with North Korea since 2003.

Comments to this entry

Aceface
June 1, 2009
4:46 pm
Too much geopolitical thinking which is very Kaplanesque.
KJI and his acolytes simply afraid of their people finding out that there are other ways to achieve happiness instead of the rule of the dear leader.Which make them afraid of South Korean society,something the people of the north would undoubtly wants to be part of it if only the chances are given.
KJI wants direct deal with Washington so that he can postpone the south-led reunification at least while he's alive and also strengthen his only legitimacy which is being Korean nationalist who doesn't kow-tow to American/Japanese.
Carl
June 1, 2009
7:09 pm
Kaplan starts his article out with a factual error. 'Little Boy' was 13-18kT, preliminary estimates on the NORK latest are somewhere south of 5-8kT, perhaps even as low as 1.6kT. I hate to sound pedantic, but that's very sloppy, especially when he only had about four facts to check in the whole piece.

The rest of the article simply points out the obvious.
Joseph Dart
June 2, 2009
1:56 am
"China also has good reasons for not wanting to see the kind of North-South Korean conglomerate that might ultimately emerge from collapse." Would such a beast really emerge? Or two decades post-collapse, will it look more like Moldova-Romania rather than East Germany-West Germany?

My suspicion is that even in a semi-liberalised North Korea, a large proportion of the population would reject reunification unless it happened too fast for them to have any time to think about it. Southern investors will flow North, North Korean guest workers will flow South, and in both cases Northern resentment about being treated like second-class citizens by their alleged "brothers" will grow and grow ...
shane heffernan
June 3, 2009
3:46 pm
All i would like to state which is not original nor financially motivated thus undoubtly will sink like a rock in the ocean! And that is (WHY) why today is it okay for one country to have nukes and others not, no nation on the planet desrves the right to hold over another a nuclear weapon period! the time old saying goes lead by example you only have to switch on the tv and the newest weapon that dose it bigger and better is in your face. The arms race isnt about to start it has never stopped! Not because of KJI but sad to say because thats the way we are, it has to change for our childrens sake .....please try
kurt9
June 4, 2009
10:23 pm
My Korean rep told me on my last visit there that China wants to take over NK because they do not want to deal with border issues. According to him, Japan gave Korean land to the Chinese as part of the deal they made with China and Russia when they took Korea as a colony. If North and South Korea were to reunite, the reunited Korea may will want to revisit the border issue with China, which of course, would be very inconvenient for China.

Since the Chinese don't believe in actually invading "non-Chinese" land, they prefer to handle these things using the soft approach. The Chinese are well aware that most South Koreans are not willing to sacrifice their material standard of living (like the West Germans did) in order to reunite and prop up a destitute North Korea. So, the Chinese will always keep North Korean nominally independent, but will become increasing influential in running the place behind the scenes. This actually works out for everyone (except for Korean nationalists like my rep) because it would be a lot easier and faster for North Korea to reach economic parity with the much larger, but the lower standard of living China that to reach South Korean standards of living, thus making "pragmatic" South Koreans happy too.

This is the kind of strategic geo-politics the Chinese have historically been quite good at. Despite their flaws, the Beijing leadership is not stupid.
Robert Kaplan On Whether North Korea Is the Next Iraq | ROK Drop
June 9, 2009
12:01 pm
[...] Nonetheless, Kim tries to remain feistily independent of China, for while China doesn’t want North Korea to implode catastrophically, China does have designs on North Korea’s territory: It prefers the idea of a Gorbachevian buffer state like Tibet on its northeastern frontier in place of Kim’s erratic totalitarian regime.  [The Atlantic via Coming Anarchy] [...]
Left Flank
June 13, 2009
6:21 am
That ROKDrop link is busted!