Entry details

MF
Author

Munro Ferguson

Date

April 24th, 2009

Tags

Comments

6 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Britain’s watchful eyes

watchful_eyes

What the Met envisions as “reassurance” looks a bit more like a book cover illustration for the latest re-print of Orwell’s 1984.

With some 4 million CCTV cameras Britain is considered one of the most (if not the most) surveilled societies on earth. Recently Eamonn Butler of the Adam Smith institute undertook an experiment in observation to illustrate just how pervasive Britain’s CCTV camera’s can be. Via Christopher Hope:

Eamonn Butler, a director of the Adam Smith Institute, has just completed what he calls an “alternative Easter egg hunt for CCTV cameras” on the ancient Procession route from Westminster Abbey to Westminster Cathedral.

The Procession on Good Friday is part of Holy Week’s re-enactments of Jesus Christ’s last journey before he was crucified.

It is organised by Westminster Abbey, Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Cathedral and covers a 700 yard stretch along Victoria Street in central London.

Mr Butler, author of the Rotten State of Britain, walked the Procession this week and counted 155 CCTV cameras.

He tells me: “If I had better eyesight and a pair of binoculars, I could probably have spotted more. But with binoculars looking at CCTV cameras, I’d probably have been arrested.”

Note to alert readers: five years ago there were no CCTV cameras on Victoria Street.

That’s roughly one camera for every four and one half yards (4.1 meters.)

There’s some irony here. British citizens are expected to be photographed by authorities in virtually every public move they make, yet snapping a photo themselves could invite trouble with the law. Since February of this year, any person photographing police or military personnel in a fashion that is “likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism,” could face up to ten years in prison. That’s a rather murky circumstance on which to base probable cause, isn’t it?

Image via BoingBoing.

Comments to this entry

Patton
April 24, 2009
10:45 pm
I guess the marketeer who came up with that campaign has never read "1984".
B Walthrop
April 25, 2009
1:30 pm
Kre-P
Munro Ferguson
April 26, 2009
1:53 am
Or maybe they have...
tim fiolat
April 30, 2009
7:26 pm
Orwell wasn't giving the people a warning about the dangers of tyranny he was providing "them" with a "how to" manual.
Munro Ferguson
April 30, 2009
11:31 pm
Really? Fascinating. Could you expound a bit on that?
tim fiolat
May 3, 2009
6:36 pm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6976576.stm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-479722/Big-Brother-watching-George-Orwell-communist-views.html

if you follow the books direction and reduce the peoples ability to think (see the decline in literacy in the west) the number of readers who will get the message declines at the same time as the number of people reading it declines, the people reading it and not getting the message are familiarized with the ideas and potentially accept them easier.
Orwell was a Communist (see the above articles or look it up) the fact that there are more of the books ideas - new-speak, cameras etc being accepted than there are victorious fights against the ideas the book gives, would lead one to suspect it is being used as a manual and that in spite of his (Orwell's) denials of communism and tyranny he was very successful in infiltrating its ideas into the west with the use of fiction as a carrier, infecting a society that would be resistant to the direct presentation or promotion of those ideas.