Both Chirol and Eddie wrote several years ago that the US should declare victory in the war on terrorism and move on. Britain ultimately took this policy choice and dropped the “bumper sticker” policy slogan. The U.S. under G.W. Bush did not.
But a policy change has come with the Obama administration, so says Secretary of State Hillary Clinton:
Clinton also acknowledged that administration officials have stopped calling the fight against al-Qaeda “the global war on terror,” the preferred phraseology of the Bush administration.“The administration has stopped using the phrase and I think that speaks for itself obviously,” she said, adding that there had been no formal policy directive to do so. “It’s just not being used,” she said.
Clinton is the highest level administration official to acknowledge the shift but she did not give a reason for the change. Many Democrats have contended that the “war on terror” label was too broad, potentially enlisting the United States in a war with any militant group; the president’s new Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy says it has the central aim of disrupting, dismantling and defeating al-Qaeda.

Comments to this entry
Mark McGlinchey
March 31, 2009
5:41 pm
Via Ben Smith, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell [the DOD's press guy] says the preferred term is "a campaign against extremists who wish to do us harm."
It might take a while for CAEWWTDUH to replace GWOT in the lexicon, but the bigger concern, really, is that the word "extremists" seems a bit bellicose for [this] administration. Perhaps a 'campaign against undocumented freedom fighters who just might need a really big hug' would be more fitting.
Alfred Russel Wallace
March 31, 2009
8:26 pm
Time to ditch "War on Drugs" too - look what that has done to Mexico and Colombia.
Chief Wiggum
March 31, 2009
11:36 pm
Attacks like 9/11 are now lumped with other man-caused disasters, like global warming.