When the Arabs conquered the Mediterranean, shutting off the flow of goods, money, people and security from Europe to North Africa and the Levant, the center of Western civilization moved northwards. As the synergy between mass communications, transportation and new technology empower the East, we see a lagging Asia catching up and the center of world power shifting, albeit slowly, from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Both Thomas Barnett (who I hope to meet Tuesday!)and Robert Kaplan have discussed this trend and that the US is uniquely positioned to be a major player on both sides thanks to its geography.
The announcement that Secretary of State Clinton’s first trip will be to Asia instead of Europe is further evidence.
One interesting question is, assuming the center of global power (political, economic, military) does slowly shift to the Pacific, what will it mean for Oceania’s vast array of failing and ungoverned states? Will we see more interventions and peacekeeping missions? Will the US take the lead or may Australia, New Zealand, Japan, China or India. As traffic increases will instability on the many island states there lead to intervention, or can they be bypassed and isolated given their geographic location? Will they face increased pressure to democratize or to regulate their financial systems (e.g. lots of money laundering)? It would be an interesting topic for the boys at Pacific Empire (if they are still alive).

Comments to this entry
Curzon
February 4, 2009
5:21 am
Will there be more intervention? It seems unlikely, as most of these places are pretty far removed and will only become targeted if they cause problems. The US only went into Haiti and Cuba on very limited levels when the instability could was affecting it. The peoples of the Balkans were basically left to kill themselves until the 1990s, and even then NATO only picked up the pieces after all was said and done.
The best hope for intervention in any of these places is a new Cold War. Countries won't commit collectively to help these places out, but if they see their interests threatened by another competing power, they may commit more.
Just An Australian
February 4, 2009
11:14 am
Curzon
February 4, 2009
11:19 am
Yes, historically they've been sustenance communities, thrust into modern technology, and are unlikely to ever seen any real growth except what they can squeeze out through tourism.
As for New Zealand, as I was writing just days ago, the "Realm" of New Zealand is in fact enormous.
Rommel
February 4, 2009
3:35 pm
Machiavelli's Cat
February 4, 2009
7:16 pm
Just An Australian
February 4, 2009
8:02 pm
Solomons is more serious, I think. But as I said, they won't get *too far* out of line - mainly, that is inept as they get, they won't go exporting trouble.