<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reverend Graham and the DPRK; or, how individuals can impact the course of human&#160;events</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:04:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Southern Presbyterian Missionary Sites of Gwangju &#124; The Marmot's Hole</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-388238</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Presbyterian Missionary Sites of Gwangju &#124; The Marmot's Hole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-388238</guid>
		<description>[...] at Coming Anarchy, Curzon wrote an outstanding post on Rev. Bell and how one individual can impact the course of human events. His name lives on, of course, in Eugene Bell Foundation, a humanitarian organization providing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Coming Anarchy, Curzon wrote an outstanding post on Rev. Bell and how one individual can impact the course of human events. His name lives on, of course, in Eugene Bell Foundation, a humanitarian organization providing [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROK Drop Weekly Linklets - 25JAN09 &#124; ROK Drop</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387486</link>
		<dc:creator>ROK Drop Weekly Linklets - 25JAN09 &#124; ROK Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387486</guid>
		<description>[...] What does Billy Graham have to do with North Korea?  Find out here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What does Billy Graham have to do with North Korea?&Acirc;&nbsp; Find out here. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frog in a Well - The Korea History Group Blog</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387468</link>
		<dc:creator>Frog in a Well - The Korea History Group Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387468</guid>
		<description>[...] Speaking of Surreal, Curzon has a post on Reverend Billy Graham&#8217;s relationship with North Korea, starting with his missionary ancestors. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speaking of Surreal, Curzon has a post on Reverend Billy Graham&#8217;s relationship with North Korea, starting with his missionary ancestors. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mutantfrog Travelogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Graham and Kim</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387465</link>
		<dc:creator>Mutantfrog Travelogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Graham and Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387465</guid>
		<description>[...] friend Curzon over at the Cominganarchy blog posted last week an excellent piece on the history of the involvement between the familes of the Reverend Billy Graham and the Kim dynasty of North [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friend Curzon over at the Cominganarchy blog posted last week an excellent piece on the history of the involvement between the familes of the Reverend Billy Graham and the Kim dynasty of North [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387463</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387463</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. I wasn&#039;t aware of all of the details.

By the way, the Westerner in the background of the Franklin Graham picture is Dr. John Linton, brother of Stephen Linton. Dr. John Linton translated for Franklin&#039;s trip. His regular job is runnning the international health care center at Yonsei&#039;s Severance Hospital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. I wasn&#8217;t aware of all of the details.</p>

<p>By the way, the Westerner in the background of the Franklin Graham picture is Dr. John Linton, brother of Stephen Linton. Dr. John Linton translated for Franklin&#8217;s trip. His regular job is runnning the international health care center at Yonsei&#8217;s Severance Hospital.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great Post on Eugene Bell, Billy Graham and North Korea &#124; The Marmot's Hole</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387446</link>
		<dc:creator>Great Post on Eugene Bell, Billy Graham and North Korea &#124; The Marmot's Hole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387446</guid>
		<description>[...] at Coming Anarchy has written a wonderful post on how a &#8220;Kentuck missionary visiting Korea in the 1890s resulted in a former US president [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Coming Anarchy has written a wonderful post on how a &#8220;Kentuck missionary visiting Korea in the 1890s resulted in a former US president [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kushibo</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387419</link>
		<dc:creator>kushibo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387419</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;But all that being said, what verb would you prefer instead of convert?&lt;/b&gt;

Good question. I guess I would have said, &quot;Billy Graham, a Baptist, went on to be one of the most popular evangelists in American history while Ruth, a Presbyterian, never &lt;i&gt;left her church&lt;/i&gt; (or &lt;i&gt;denomination&lt;/i&gt;).

Among my extended family are a lot of Christians who married Christians of a different denomination (including Protestants marrying Catholics). When it was intra-Protestant marriages, they talk(ed) about changing churches, leaving churches, joining churches, but never &quot;converting.&quot; I&#039;ve heard &quot;converting&quot; only when Protestants became Catholics. Among friends, when Christians (Catholics or Protestants) adopted the Jewish faith of their spouse, they also used the word &quot;convert.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>But all that being said, what verb would you prefer instead of convert?</b></p>

<p>Good question. I guess I would have said, &#8220;Billy Graham, a Baptist, went on to be one of the most popular evangelists in American history while Ruth, a Presbyterian, never <i>left her church</i> (or <i>denomination</i>).</p>

<p>Among my extended family are a lot of Christians who married Christians of a different denomination (including Protestants marrying Catholics). When it was intra-Protestant marriages, they talk(ed) about changing churches, leaving churches, joining churches, but never &#8220;converting.&#8221; I&#8217;ve heard &#8220;converting&#8221; only when Protestants became Catholics. Among friends, when Christians (Catholics or Protestants) adopted the Jewish faith of their spouse, they also used the word &#8220;convert.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kushibo</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387418</link>
		<dc:creator>kushibo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387418</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Kushibo, the practice of Baptist and Presbyterian worship is very different, and “Protestant” has very little meaning in 21st century America—&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;

21st century America? Mr Graham and Miss Bell married nearly six decades before the 21st century began. Protestant was a very clear concept to a lot of Christians (WASP, anyone?) in their early-to-mid-20th century world. 

In fact, in the half century of missionary proliferation in Korea in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the various Protestant denominations actively cooperated to divide up Chosŏn/Chōsen into non-competing territories, since they saw all the Protestant denominations as working toward the same ends. 

&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;while some Prebyterians may still define themselves as a Protestant denomination to differentiate themselves from Roman Catholicism, most Baptists refer to themselves as “Christian.”&lt;/b&gt;

Your experience seems different from mine. Including close relatives with whom I&#039;ve attended church, I know a lot of Presbyterians and a lot of Baptists, and they all refer to themselves as Christians first, and then their sect second. 

But I do agree with you that &lt;i&gt;nowadays&lt;/i&gt; the prominence and unity of &quot;Protestant&quot; as a singular concept is eroding. The concept of a Protestant/Catholic dichotomy is being replaced by an evangelical/fundamentalist-versus-non-evangelical dichotomy. (If that&#039;s what you&#039;re getting at.)

&lt;b&gt;You’ll note that fundamentalist Christians reject the entire Catholic-Protestant paradigm. But all that being said, what verb would you prefer instead of convert?&lt;/b&gt;

That goes along with the dichotomy I mentioned above. But when the Grahams met in the early 1940s, such was not the case. 

By the way, I recall talking about Dr Steven Linton in the last half of &lt;a href=&quot;http://kushibo.blogspot.com/2005/10/pyongyang-says-bumper-crop-means-no.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this post from 2005&lt;/a&gt;, in the context of North Korean aid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Kushibo, the practice of Baptist and Presbyterian worship is very different, and &acirc;Protestant&acirc; has very little meaning in 21st century America&acirc;</b><b></b></p>

<p>21st century America? Mr Graham and Miss Bell married nearly six decades before the 21st century began. Protestant was a very clear concept to a lot of Christians (WASP, anyone?) in their early-to-mid-20th century world. </p>

<p>In fact, in the half century of missionary proliferation in Korea in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the various Protestant denominations actively cooperated to divide up Chos&Aring;n/Ch&Aring;sen into non-competing territories, since they saw all the Protestant denominations as working toward the same ends. </p>

<p><b>while some Prebyterians may still define themselves as a Protestant denomination to differentiate themselves from Roman Catholicism, most Baptists refer to themselves as &acirc;Christian.&acirc;</b></p>

<p>Your experience seems different from mine. Including close relatives with whom I&#8217;ve attended church, I know a lot of Presbyterians and a lot of Baptists, and they all refer to themselves as Christians first, and then their sect second. </p>

<p>But I do agree with you that <i>nowadays</i> the prominence and unity of &#8220;Protestant&#8221; as a singular concept is eroding. The concept of a Protestant/Catholic dichotomy is being replaced by an evangelical/fundamentalist-versus-non-evangelical dichotomy. (If that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re getting at.)</p>

<p><b>You&acirc;ll note that fundamentalist Christians reject the entire Catholic-Protestant paradigm. But all that being said, what verb would you prefer instead of convert?</b></p>

<p>That goes along with the dichotomy I mentioned above. But when the Grahams met in the early 1940s, such was not the case. </p>

<p>By the way, I recall talking about Dr Steven Linton in the last half of <a href="http://kushibo.blogspot.com/2005/10/pyongyang-says-bumper-crop-means-no.html" rel="nofollow">this post from 2005</a>, in the context of North Korean aid.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexington Green</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387416</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexington Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387416</guid>
		<description>&quot;...reject the entire Catholic-Protestant paradigm...&quot;

In the sense that they believe that Catholics are not &quot;saved&quot; and hence not Christians and going to Hell.  I suppose that is &quot;rejecting a paradigm&quot;.  It is fun to go to large Catholic events in Chicago.  There are often &quot;Christians&quot; protesting there, telling you that you are not a Christian and you are going to Hell.  One guy got right in my face and said &quot;have you accepted Jesus Christ as your personal savior or not!&quot;  I said, &quot;yes&quot;, and he screamed &quot;liar!&quot;  One guy in Indiana was talking to a bunch of people about his faith, and started to say something, he put his hand right in my face and said, &quot;when you get rid of the Pope, you can talk to me about religion.&quot;  There is a lot more where that came from.
.
Just to clarify that &quot;rejecting the entire Catholic-Protestant paradigm&quot; means less, not more, civility and tolerance from &quot;Christians&quot; toward Catholics. With the recent depraved conduct of some of the Catholic clergy, there is the smell of blood in the water, and these guys are hoping they may finally see the Whore of Babylon breathe its last.
.
It will be a long wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;reject the entire Catholic-Protestant paradigm&#8230;&#8221;</p>

<p>In the sense that they believe that Catholics are not &#8220;saved&#8221; and hence not Christians and going to Hell.  I suppose that is &#8220;rejecting a paradigm&#8221;.  It is fun to go to large Catholic events in Chicago.  There are often &#8220;Christians&#8221; protesting there, telling you that you are not a Christian and you are going to Hell.  One guy got right in my face and said &#8220;have you accepted Jesus Christ as your personal savior or not!&#8221;  I said, &#8220;yes&#8221;, and he screamed &#8220;liar!&#8221;  One guy in Indiana was talking to a bunch of people about his faith, and started to say something, he put his hand right in my face and said, &#8220;when you get rid of the Pope, you can talk to me about religion.&#8221;  There is a lot more where that came from.<br />
.<br />
Just to clarify that &#8220;rejecting the entire Catholic-Protestant paradigm&#8221; means less, not more, civility and tolerance from &#8220;Christians&#8221; toward Catholics. With the recent depraved conduct of some of the Catholic clergy, there is the smell of blood in the water, and these guys are hoping they may finally see the Whore of Babylon breathe its last.<br />
.<br />
It will be a long wait.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curzon</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387408</link>
		<dc:creator>Curzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387408</guid>
		<description>Kushibo, the practice of Baptist and Presbyterian worship is very different, and &quot;Protestant&quot; has very little meaning in 21st century America -- while some Prebyterians may still define themselves as a Protestant denomination to differentiate themselves from Roman Catholicism, most Baptists refer to themselves as &quot;Christian.&quot;  You&#039;ll note that fundamentalist Christians reject the entire Catholic-Protestant paradigm.  But all that being said, what verb would you prefer instead of convert?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kushibo, the practice of Baptist and Presbyterian worship is very different, and &#8220;Protestant&#8221; has very little meaning in 21st century America &#8212; while some Prebyterians may still define themselves as a Protestant denomination to differentiate themselves from Roman Catholicism, most Baptists refer to themselves as &#8220;Christian.&#8221;  You&#8217;ll note that fundamentalist Christians reject the entire Catholic-Protestant paradigm.  But all that being said, what verb would you prefer instead of convert?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kushibo</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387395</link>
		<dc:creator>kushibo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387395</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Billy Graham, a Baptist, went on to be one of the most popular evangelists in American history while Ruth, a Presbyterian, never converted.&lt;/blockquote&gt;That was an odd sentence. They&#039;re both Protestant Christians, so neither would need to &quot;convert&quot; the other. 

Part of the equation may be that Kim Il-Sung himself might have had a soft spot for Presbyterians and other Protestants. His grandfather was a minister and his family in general was religious. I&#039;m not so sure he ever personally accepted the ideological fervor against religion that European communists did. He certainly seemed to understand how to mold certain aspects of religion into a personality cult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Billy Graham, a Baptist, went on to be one of the most popular evangelists in American history while Ruth, a Presbyterian, never converted.</blockquote>That was an odd sentence. They&#8217;re both Protestant Christians, so neither would need to &#8220;convert&#8221; the other. 

<p>Part of the equation may be that Kim Il-Sung himself might have had a soft spot for Presbyterians and other Protestants. His grandfather was a minister and his family in general was religious. I&#8217;m not so sure he ever personally accepted the ideological fervor against religion that European communists did. He certainly seemed to understand how to mold certain aspects of religion into a personality cult.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Russel Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387392</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Russel Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387392</guid>
		<description>Excellent post... A real example akin to the notion that a butterfly flapping its wings somewhere starts a hurricane. ... Admiral - you pose an interesting last question, but surely there is a simple answer? How many millions must perish before the DPRK is wiped away? As many as it takes for the people of North Korea to realize THEY must change their leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post&#8230; A real example akin to the notion that a butterfly flapping its wings somewhere starts a hurricane. &#8230; Admiral &#8211; you pose an interesting last question, but surely there is a simple answer? How many millions must perish before the <span class="caps">DPRK </span>is wiped away? As many as it takes for the people of North Korea to realize <span class="caps">THEY </span>must change their leader.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codex Politicus Linkuri la cafeaua de weekend</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387387</link>
		<dc:creator>Codex Politicus Linkuri la cafeaua de weekend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387387</guid>
		<description>[...] ca nu intereseaza pe nimeni, dar baietii de la Coming Anarchy au un articol despre Billy Graham, sotia sa si Kim Il [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ca nu intereseaza pe nimeni, dar baietii de la Coming Anarchy au un articol despre Billy Graham, sotia sa si Kim Il [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admiral</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387385</link>
		<dc:creator>Admiral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387385</guid>
		<description>I agree that this is a *GREAT* post as well, though I would not have been as &quot;dispassionate&quot; as Adamu puts it. This fascinating chain of events may have led to the prevention of proper regime change in the DPRK. It prevented untold carnage, as well, but... I think it would have been worth it. If there was ever a regime that _deserved_ a well strategic nuclear weapons, it is theirs: in 1951, 1994, and today. 

Whether the cost-benefit works out as tidily today as it did back in those days is another question entirely, sadly. How many millions must perish before the DPRK is wiped away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is a <strong><span class="caps">GREAT</span></strong> post as well, though I would not have been as &#8220;dispassionate&#8221; as Adamu puts it. This fascinating chain of events may have led to the prevention of proper regime change in the <span class="caps">DPRK.</span> It prevented untold carnage, as well, but&#8230; I think it would have been worth it. If there was ever a regime that <em>deserved</em> a well strategic nuclear weapons, it is theirs: in 1951, 1994, and today. </p>

<p>Whether the cost-benefit works out as tidily today as it did back in those days is another question entirely, sadly. How many millions must perish before the <span class="caps">DPRK </span>is wiped away?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdaxp</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387383</link>
		<dc:creator>tdaxp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387383</guid>
		<description>There is a pretty good history of Billy Graham&#039;s father-in-law, who was an American missionary in China. [1]

The engagement of the Graham family in East Asia would be a an interesting history to know

[1] http://www.amazon.com/Foreign-Devil-China-Story-Nelson/dp/0890661413</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a pretty good history of Billy Graham&#8217;s father-in-law, who was an American missionary in China. [1]</p>

<p>The engagement of the Graham family in East Asia would be a an interesting history to know</p>

<p>[1] <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Foreign-Devil-China-Story-Nelson/dp/0890661413">http://www.amazon.com/Foreign-Devil-China-Story-Nelson/dp/0890661413</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aceface</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387382</link>
		<dc:creator>Aceface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387382</guid>
		<description>An idea for your next post.
Reverend Moon&#039;s lone crusade for the resurgence of Japanese right wingers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An idea for your next post.<br />
Reverend Moon&#8217;s lone crusade for the resurgence of Japanese right wingers&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Berman</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387381</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Berman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387381</guid>
		<description>Agreed, very nice. I may have to read up on this story a bit myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, very nice. I may have to read up on this story a bit myself.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adamu</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2009/01/16/reverend-graham-and-the-dprk/comment-page-1/#comment-387380</link>
		<dc:creator>Adamu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/?p=4228#comment-387380</guid>
		<description>Great post. Your dispassionate reporting on DPRK is all the more impressive considering that this is a country you&#039;ve advocated dropping nuclear bombs on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Your dispassionate reporting on <span class="caps">DPRK </span>is all the more impressive considering that this is a country you&#8217;ve advocated dropping nuclear bombs on.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
