Here is a quick summary of an article in the Tagesschau, a German language news source.
Background
Under the German constitution, only parliament has the power to send German troops into combat, not the Chancellor. This condition is based on World War II as well as the clause written into the constitution that Germany may not engage in Angriffskriege, or wars of aggression. It can thus only act with a UN mandate or lacking that, a NATO mandate (as in Kosovo). Additionally, it must vote yearly to renew that mandate. For Afghanistan, the Bundestag votes October 15th of every year.
Renewal
The Bundestag voted to new renew the German army’s mandate for Afghanistan by 14 months, i.e. until December 13th 2009. The vote was 442 yes, 96 no and 32 abstaining indicating overwhelming support for the mission, contrary to news reports. It also raises the maximum troop levels which the Ministry of Defense can send to 4,500, an increase of 1,000 soldiers. Germany is currently the third largest provider of ISAF troops.
However, Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung noted that the increase does not mean an additional thousand soldiers will immediately be sent. He stressed it means more flexibility for Germany in responding to the ongoing situation and that less engagement or pulling out is not an alternative as it would mean breaking Germany’s promises and failing to participate in its international responsibility.
Chirol,
If Germany is attacked by military force the armed forces can react without any “mandate” at all (Art. 87a II). Art. 87 also applies to the mil. reaction to an attack on a fellow NATO member.
I must say I find it very strange that this primary function of Germany`s armed forces is so often overlooked, not just in this post but also in the MSM and in other blogs.
In fairness, I should probably be overjoyed to note that there are out there who acknowledge the the (bitterly diveded) present govt can t just send troops somewhere.
Oops, I left out “some people out there”.
Fabius: I’m well aware the German army can defend Germany without any mandate should Germany come under direct attack. Hence I noted ‘wars of aggression’ On top of this, this entire post is only about Afghanistan, hence only abroad. My first response to your comments wa simply “duh!”
Pingback: The Key To Peace In Afghanistan Means Including the Taliban | Prose Before Hos