Entry details

Curzon
Author

Curzon

Date

October 8th, 2008

Tags

Comments

8 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Reintroducing Sovereign Bankruptcy

Think countries can’t go bankrupt? Think again. Philip II of Spain had to declare four state bankruptcies in 1557, 1560, 1575 and 1596. Japan went bankrupt twice in the early 20th century. And Iceland, despite having the world’s highest Human Development Index (HDI) and last year winning the U.N.’s “best country to live in” poll with the most contented population in the world, may be on the brink of sovereign bankruptcy:

This volcanic island near the Arctic Circle is on the brink of becoming the first “national bankruptcy” of the global financial meltdown. Home to just 320,000 people on a territory the size of Kentucky, Iceland has formidable international reach because of an outsized banking sector that set out with Viking confidence to conquer swaths of the British economy — from fashion retailers to top soccer teams.

The strategy gave Icelanders one of the world’s highest per capita incomes. But now they are watching helplessly as their economy implodes — their currency losing almost half its value, and their heavily exposed banks collapsing under the weight of debts incurred by lending in the boom times.

“Everything is closed. We couldn’t sell our stock or take money from the bank,” said Johann Sigurdsson as he left a branch of Landsbanki in downtown Reykjavik.

The government has taken drastic measures. The government has nationalized the country’s third largest bank, granted itself authorities to seize companies and limit board of director control, and was even negotiating a $5.4 billion loan from Russia to shore up its national finances.

Who is to blame?

As regular Icelanders begin to blame the government and market regulators, Haarde said the banks had been “victims of external circumstances.” Richard Portes of the London Business School agreed, noting the banks were well-capitalized and had not bought any of the toxic debt that has brought down banks elsewhere. “I believe it is absolutely wrong to say these banks were reckless,” said. “Quite the contrary. They were hugely unlucky.”

Comments to this entry

Joel Dietz
October 8, 2008
8:23 pm
'Unlucky' ? Am I unlucky if I lose all my savings for my childrens' education while gambling in Las Vegas.

Maybe because I chose Roulette instead of Blackjack? Or bet it all on black?
Curzon
October 9, 2008
4:59 am
Apples and bowling balls, Joel. This isn't about gambling, its about leverage and to what extent any person, company or bank can safely have liabilities exceed liquidity.
TDL
October 9, 2008
6:36 pm
The Icelandic banks & financial institutions over-extended themselves. They are partially to blame. They took onto too many foreign loans to buy up UK & European real estate & retail assets. Too much leverage deployed in too concentrated of a portfolio. They made bets that the low interest rate & "stable" global economic environment would proceed for the next 10+ years. They, should have been more concerned with their risks (interest rate risk & currency risk.)

Regards,
TDL
Rubashov
October 9, 2008
6:42 pm
It _was_ gambling, Curzon. Look back at the quotes:

"their heavily exposed banks collapsing under the weight of debts incurred by lending in the boom times."

Their banks overexposed themselves in good times, _betting_ that those good times would continue long enough to get repaid.

We went through a miniature version of the current crisis in Iowa during the 1970s and 1980s. The price of farm land skyrockted, and lots of people took out loans to by more land because people thought it would go up. When the price of farmland went down, they lost their _leveraged_ shirts, couldn't pay the bank, and the banks went down with them (in some cases after the farmer shot his banker). My grandfather was one of the rare bankers that didn't ride the good times like Iceland did, and when things crashed, his bank stood solid.
Curzon
October 10, 2008
2:30 am
I disagree with your terminology. Every institution is engaged in exercising leverage, which means that the potential outcome is magnified. The banks in Iceland overleveraged -- an issue of risk analysis, but not gambling (which would be criminal).
feeblemind
October 12, 2008
5:00 am
What is the difference between a calculated risk and a gamble? My Webster's defines gamble: 'To take a risk in order to gain some advantage.'
Mark
October 12, 2008
2:56 pm
The welfare state is dying. Good riddance. When the welfare checks stop coming, US cities will burn.
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Greenland Independence?
November 28, 2008
6:51 am
[...] fun facts about the coldest inhabited regions of the world, such as France’s Icelands, Iceland’s bankruptcy, banks of seeds, and seeding arctic [...]