Excerpted from the South China Morning Post:
Vietnam protests over Chinese ‘invasion plans’ Beijing dismisses online threatsVietnam has formally protested to China over so-called “invasion plans” appearing on mainland websites that purport to detail the complete military occupation of the country by China.
Hanoi has twice summoned senior Chinese diplomats to voice its concerns over the material which, while unsourced and apparently unofficial, has alarmed diplomatic and military elites in the Vietnamese capital after appearing repeatedly over the past month.
The supposed plans detail a 31-day invasion, starting with five days of missile strikes from land, sea and air and climaxing in an invasion involving 310,000 troops sweeping into Vietnam from Yunnan , Guangxi and the South China Sea. The electronic jamming of Vietnamese command and communications centres is mentioned, along with the blocking of sea lanes in the South China Sea.
The reasoning?
“Vietnam is a major threat to the safety of Chinese territories, and the biggest obstacle to the peaceful emergence of China… Also, Vietnam is the strategic hub of the whole of Southeast Asia. Vietnam has to be conquered first if Southeast Asia is to be under [China’s] control again.” That’s some serious cognitive dissonance.
China has said the article does not reflect the views of the government. But Vietnam has countered that China actively polices the content of mainland websites.

Comments to this entry
tdaxp
September 6, 2008
7:30 pm
Who benefits?
buzz
September 6, 2008
7:58 pm
The supposed plans detail a 31-day invasion, starting with five days of missile strikes from land, sea and air and climaxing in an invasion involving 310,000 troops sweeping into Vietnam...
Elambend
September 6, 2008
8:24 pm
Otherwise, though, I cannot see how this benefits China. Vietnam can be dominated without invasion. The possibly oil-rich ocean areas can be taken without land invasion. Plus, if anything was to be invaded, why not Taiwan. Furthermore, why alienate the rest of East Asia. (talk about freaking out the Koreans and Japan - it would drive the former back to the U.S. and possibly tip the latter to nuclearization). I believe it's nothing more than the hopeful ramblings of nationalist citizens.
B
September 6, 2008
10:34 pm
Jing
September 6, 2008
11:14 pm
Lexington Green
September 7, 2008
1:30 am
Curzon
September 7, 2008
1:45 am
Aceface
September 7, 2008
3:39 am
http://www.adb.org/Documents/News/VRM/vrm-200718.asp
Yors Truly
September 7, 2008
7:08 am
Jing
September 7, 2008
11:23 am
Pot & Kettle from Vietnam. Considering they routinely unleash their own fenqing at the Chinese embassy with chants of "dey tuk ur Land!" whenever they wish.
Curzon
September 7, 2008
12:36 pm
Aceface
September 7, 2008
1:20 pm
I've heard that one before....
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-04/18/content_2844015.htm
"To defend everything is defend nothing" indeed....
Aceface
September 7, 2008
1:36 pm
"Anti-Japanese Protests Held at Japanese Embassy in Vietnam
Apr. 17, 2005 7:03pm JST
HANOI (4/17, Reuters) Anti-Japanese protests were held in front of the Japanese embassy in Vietnam’s capital city Hanoi.
Wearing headbands, the participants shouted anti-Japanese slogans into bullhorns and waved banners written in English and Chinese characters. One of the banners read “Japan get out!”
The demonstrators are said to be expatriate Chinese living in Vietnam."
B
September 7, 2008
3:20 pm
Richard
September 7, 2008
4:33 pm
Jing
September 8, 2008
2:45 am
Actually Aceface I was referring to this.
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5j2rw7qqR9vew-eOrGCoDgp6S69Kw
and this.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/china-protests-inspire-vietnamese/
Euv
September 8, 2008
1:02 pm
idiots these days...
permaterry
September 8, 2008
2:42 pm
dave
September 8, 2008
6:13 pm
happens and someone die especially some of your relative die
it's not fun anymore.
Rommel
September 9, 2008
12:19 am
Euv, you are either a Chinese nationalist troll or you are a troll of an even sadder breed..
Either way your comment was crass and disrespectful to say the least and its kind has no place in this gentleman's forum.
That said, ElamBend, in his geo-politically learned ways needs no defense by me and I would wager he is dignified enough to ignore your ignorant drivel.
Mitch H.
September 9, 2008
11:07 pm
Now? The PLA is one of the major economic players in the world economy, and the American War generation in Vietnam are antiques or dead. I wouldn't call it a rollover, but a Chinese victory might be plausible, if they caught the Vietnamese unprepared. The US certainly isn't positioned to do anything about it, I don't think. It isn't as if Vietnam was an island...
dave
September 10, 2008
5:58 am
soldier if China want to invade, I am sure the invader don't
want to spend that much. cost too much money to get something
in return. After all, Vietnamese are people with culture, not
like so called "rebellious" tibetian by China, OR rebellious
Georgia by the Russia whose population just a few millions to
be easy harrass. I know people like to talk bullshit on the internet the facts are people with average IQ knew already.
you want to know about anything go to www.wikipedia.org
dave
September 10, 2008
6:09 am
Yours Truly
September 10, 2008
9:38 am
Got to agree with you, I doubt the Mainland Chinese are so d!@#headed as to invade any of their neighboring states. They just ain't that crazy.
What If? (China invades Vietnam edition)
September 10, 2008
3:05 pm
Jing
September 11, 2008
1:51 am
The "bloody nose" scenario which every tom, dick, and harry gets from the internet is based on Vietnamese claims of Chinese casualties (real reliable there) and partly on the gross ignorance of many authors when it comes to the definition of the term casualty. A casualty is a broad term that refers to killed, wounded, missing, etc. Too many people think that casualty simply refers to killed.
lirelou
September 11, 2008
1:18 pm
Curzon
September 11, 2008
4:19 pm
Chinese Bloggers « 1000 Questions
September 12, 2008
4:31 am
Jennifer
September 24, 2008
2:05 pm
Anyway, Vietnam isn't easy to dominate over. If it is, Vietnam would not be Vietnam, it'd probably be a part of France or USA by now.
Usually people would think that Vietnam is a poor country and is very easy to control over...etc. They are indeed wrong. Vietnam's economy is growing rapidly as the quality of a Vietnamese's life is getting better and better everyday. Nowadays, you can see expensive cars all around Hanoi or Ho Chi Minh City or other growing cities. Vietnam is developing well, why should we start another war so we can start the whole thing all over again? There are people out there who went to Vietnam once and wanted to go again. If the war starts, nobody will get to go to Vietnam anymore. Noodle soup won't be available anymore as many other great food will not be there as well. (If you're thinking that you'll get noodle soup in other countries, you are wrong. Sure they have them, but the ones in Vietnam are always the best).
Yours Truly
September 24, 2008
5:49 pm
& it would be TRAGIC for 'em to start attackin' countries where there are very substantial populations of ethnic chinese o'er in those places. Anyways, it would be foolhardy to assume that wagin' war with the Vietnamese is gonna be a cakewalk.
Not so much 'bout the material wealth of the populace in a country (in fact material obsession kills a peoples' esprit de corps), but the Vietnamese have always been tough fellas.
Yours Truly
September 24, 2008
5:55 pm
Jennifer
September 25, 2008
10:50 am
What I really wanted to know is that why are they posting this on the internet? If this article wasn't true, the Chinese government will probably track down whoever wrote this. So what kind of benefit are they getting from posting up a piece of false information?
GambleLover
November 14, 2008
9:07 am
I do not think China has any plan to do this. It is apparently someone's evil trick again to increase the tension between the two countries and take advantages from this at the end. USA? Japan? Vietnam? or what? I am wondering if Vietnam is so naive to believe this? Vietnam made a voice for some reasons other than the mentioned non-existing plan. What reasons? You guys think about it.