<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Economist Still Opposes the Beijing&#160;Olympics</title>
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/07/31/the-economist-still-opposes-the-beijing-olympics/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kurt9</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/07/31/the-economist-still-opposes-the-beijing-olympics/#comment-384664</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/07/31/the-economist-still-opposes-the-beijing-olympics/#comment-384664</guid>
		<description>I don't know what the big deal is with the Chinese and nationalism. Its not like the Chinese are going to start some jihad to convert the rest of the world to Chinese-ism fundamentalism. Indeed, the Chinese have historically not been expansionistic at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what the big deal is with the Chinese and nationalism. Its not like the Chinese are going to start some jihad to convert the rest of the world to Chinese-ism fundamentalism. Indeed, the Chinese have historically not been expansionistic at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
