From John Micklethwait, Editor in Chief of The Economist:
In 2001 The Economist argued against the Olympic games being given to China, making unkind comparisons to the event in Berlin in 1936. Now that the games are about to begin, many people, not least in China, say we were wrong: the Olympics have helped the world’s largest country. We disagree. China has certainly made a huge and admirable leap forward, but that is attributable to other things, such as opening up its economy or the spread of mobile telephony. On closer examination, the Olympics have been bad for human rights and the environment, and they have done little to make China more biddable when it comes to foreign policy. Now they may further fuel the flames of nationalism.
Read the article here.
- BROWSE / IN TIMELINE
- « The Big News
- » Politics and the Olympics in the 20th century
COMMENTS / ONE COMMENT
kurt9 added these pithy words on 02 Aug 08 at 7:50 pmI don’t know what the big deal is with the Chinese and nationalism. Its not like the Chinese are going to start some jihad to convert the rest of the world to Chinese-ism fundamentalism. Indeed, the Chinese have historically not been expansionistic at all.
SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.
