<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can&#8217;t we all just get&#160;along?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cominganarchy.com/2008/05/03/cant-we-all-just-get-along/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/05/03/cant-we-all-just-get-along/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:13:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TS</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/05/03/cant-we-all-just-get-along/comment-page-1/#comment-383576</link>
		<dc:creator>TS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2008/05/03/cant-we-all-just-get-along/#comment-383576</guid>
		<description>Dude in the Tibetan flag headband needs to freakin&#039; meditate on compassion for a second or two. Those veins are gonna pop right out of his damn neck if he doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude in the Tibetan flag headband needs to freakin&#8217; meditate on compassion for a second or two. Those veins are gonna pop right out of his damn neck if he doesn&#8217;t.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan tdaxp</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/05/03/cant-we-all-just-get-along/comment-page-1/#comment-383531</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan tdaxp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2008/05/03/cant-we-all-just-get-along/#comment-383531</guid>
		<description>Nice parallelism, but extremist does not mean impassioned.

Both sides are arguing a &lt;a href=&quot;http://catholicgauze.blogspot.com/2008/04/is-tibet-chinese.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;historically defensible position&lt;/a&gt;, that Tibet was historically independent of China, or that Tibet was not historically part of China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice parallelism, but extremist does not mean impassioned.</p>

<p>Both sides are arguing a <a href="http://catholicgauze.blogspot.com/2008/04/is-tibet-chinese.html">historically defensible position</a>, that Tibet was historically independent of China, or that Tibet was not historically part of China.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
