<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deterence And the Missile&#160;Shield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:55:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ComingAnarchy.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cuban Missile Crisis Redux?</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/comment-page-1/#comment-384587</link>
		<dc:creator>ComingAnarchy.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cuban Missile Crisis Redux?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/#comment-384587</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve written about the missle shield here and here but in short, my position is that Russia&#8217;s rhetoric merely masks its continued role of trying to play the spoiler for US policies and is using it as an excuse to &#8216;misbehave&#8217; elsewhere under the cover of so-called US aggression. Do readers more knowledgeable on missile defense and nuclear affairs have a more detailed take? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve written about the missle shield here and here but in short, my position is that Russia&#8217;s rhetoric merely masks its continued role of trying to play the spoiler for US policies and is using it as an excuse to &#8216;misbehave&#8217; elsewhere under the cover of so-called US aggression. Do readers more knowledgeable on missile defense and nuclear affairs have a more detailed take? [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComingAnarchy.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why States are Important in the WoT</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/comment-page-1/#comment-384177</link>
		<dc:creator>ComingAnarchy.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why States are Important in the WoT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/#comment-384177</guid>
		<description>[...] states are also subject to deterrence through retaliation by sometims deterrence by denial (more here). Terror groups, on the other hand, have less power, resources and people than states do. Yet, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] states are also subject to deterrence through retaliation by sometims deterrence by denial (more here). Terror groups, on the other hand, have less power, resources and people than states do. Yet, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arabic Media Shack</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/comment-page-1/#comment-383624</link>
		<dc:creator>Arabic Media Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/#comment-383624</guid>
		<description>[...] made by rational states who have full command over their instruments of power.  As Chirol notes notes  deterrence has never required rational actors - in fact it is a dangerous  myth. Deterrence just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made by rational states who have full command over their instruments of power.&Acirc;&nbsp; As Chirol notes&Acirc;&nbsp;notes&Acirc;&nbsp; deterrence has never required rational actors &#8211; in fact it is a dangerous&Acirc;&nbsp; myth. Deterrence just [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabius.Maximus.Cunctator</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/comment-page-1/#comment-383362</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabius.Maximus.Cunctator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/#comment-383362</guid>
		<description>Sir,

There is something to be said for reading a document quite through instead of saving it to one`s hard disk for future reference. Highly embarrassing. Anyhow, the doc doesn`t quote a source either.

Incidentially, I am intrigued by this speculation: &quot;Such use might well have salvaged a losing campaign&quot; Might it now ? I doubt that, but then I am not a mil. historian. Pardon my presumption - but cd this be a topic for a further excellent post ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,</p>

<p>There is something to be said for reading a document quite through instead of saving it to one`s hard disk for future reference. Highly embarrassing. Anyhow, the doc doesn`t quote a source either.</p>

<p>Incidentially, I am intrigued by this speculation: &#8220;Such use might well have salvaged a losing campaign&#8221; Might it now ? I doubt that, but then I am not a mil. historian. Pardon my presumption &#8211; but cd this be a topic for a further excellent post ?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chirol</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/comment-page-1/#comment-383351</link>
		<dc:creator>Chirol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/#comment-383351</guid>
		<description>Thank you, and the quote is from the middle of page 6 of that same document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, and the quote is from the middle of page 6 of that same document.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabius.Maximus.Cunctator</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/comment-page-1/#comment-383350</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabius.Maximus.Cunctator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2008/04/20/deterence-and-the-missile-shield/#comment-383350</guid>
		<description>Sir,

Excellent. 

Where did you get the quotation from ? The &quot;However&quot; links to the declassified document. 
There was some speculation about massive gas attack in Normandie in `44, too, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,</p>

<p>Excellent. </p>

<p>Where did you get the quotation from ? The &#8220;However&#8221; links to the declassified document. <br />
There was some speculation about massive gas attack in Normandie in `44, too, btw.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
