Nord Stream, the controversial natural gas pipeline linking Russia directly with Germany has hit another snag. The Swedish government has denied the company’s application for building the line.

Consortium Nord Stream’s application for Swedish permission to build a gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea is too incomplete to take a stance on, the Swedish government said on Tuesday. Sweden’s Environment Ministry said it had on Tuesday asked Nord Stream to augment its application with environmental impact assessments along with consideration of possible alternative routes, among other things.

“Among other things” is of course code for complete rejection and the pipeline not being built. The Swedish Ministry of Defense also objected on the grounds that increased Russian naval activity and intelligence gathering in their commercial waters would be a security risk. While the Russians did little to ease these concerns with the comment that the Russian Baltic fleet would ensure the ecological safety of the project, the fact remains that it is unclear what exactly the harm would be as today’s advanced spying technologies make the presence of outdated Russian ships not particularly dangerous. Nevertheless, Sweden’s longstanding position of official neutrality could give it ample cover to any diplomatic course it chooses.

In addition, the Nord Stream pipeline raises a number of other issues. While Europeans see it as increasing their direct reliance on Russian natural gas exports, Russia sees it as diversifying its export routes and bypassing the continually unreliable land routes which pass through Belarus and Ukraine among others. Indeed, a direct route to Germany would ensure that future payment disputes in Eastern Europe do not endanger Western Europe’s access to natural gas. In addition, it is claimed that around 1 billion dollars would be saved in transit fees annually, yet simultaneously lost by Eastern European countries.

Although agreed upon and begun under former German Chancellor Schröder, current Chancellor Angela Merkel has distanced herself from both Putin and Russia and given that Merkel grew up in the former East Germany, she is bound to be wary of a former KGB agent stationed in the GDR. Europe is already dependent on Russia for over 60% of its natural gas imports and may opt for a compromise including Eastern Europe. Pipeline politics are both endlessly complicated and delicate. So, Russia’s forthcoming reaction should be an interesting one. Stay tuned.

nordstreamroute.jpg


COMMENTS / 10 COMMENTS

Very good news. The Germany-Russian pipeline would have given Moscow far too much power over the eastern European states. Good to see this be killed.

Dan tdaxp added these pithy words on 17 Feb 08 at 12:24 am

I would far from count this as killed. At the moment, it’s just delayed and even if Sweden were to completely reject the pipeline, they would likely find another route. But who knows, pipeline politics are notoriously difficult to predict.

Chirol added these pithy words on 17 Feb 08 at 9:00 am

Resource wars within the European Union?
Nord stream will supply gas to Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands, France and Britain. The project is additionally supported by the European Commission who assigned it ‘Trans-European status’. Opposition comes from Sweden, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.

IJ added these pithy words on 17 Feb 08 at 10:24 am

Hyipotesis: the true reason could be some sort of alliance by baltic states, trying to avoid that baltic sea become a “russian lake”. Could not be about intelligence gathering neither any kind of russian ship; could be about not giving too much economic and strategic russian influence over that sea, cosequently over nations on its shores. “Using” the most “outsider” in to do this. Only assumpions, of course.
Other routes are available, but they could be too close to Lituania Latvia Estonia Poland wich are not so well inclined to Russia. Terrain routes would give many troubles to Russia, more costs for Eestern Europe but more political weight to its actual or future allies.

ramjet added these pithy words on 17 Feb 08 at 10:59 am

Hyipotesis: the true reason could be some sort of alliance by baltic states, trying to avoid that baltic sea become a “russian lake”. Could not be about intelligence gathering neither any kind of russian ship; could be about not giving too much economic and strategic russian influence over that sea, cosequently over nations on its shores. “Using” the most “outsider” in to do this. Only assumpions, of course.
Other routes are available, but they could be too close to Lituania Latvia Estonia Poland wich are not so well inclined to Russia. Terrain routes would give many troubles to Russia, more costs for Eestern Europe but more political weight to its (EU) actual and future allies.

ramjet added these pithy words on 17 Feb 08 at 11:00 am

I apologize for the douplicate post…

ramjet added these pithy words on 17 Feb 08 at 11:08 am

The big powers within the EU will likely win this resource war. However the next one will be less clear cut: who get the gas once the pipelines are built – the nearer to the source the better? This is bad news for Britain.

IJ added these pithy words on 17 Feb 08 at 11:45 am

Dear Sirs,

I fully agree with Dan that this is good news indeed.

Two things may be added from the Central-European perspective of this blogger:

While Herr Schröder was still chancellor he rode roughshod over certain of his EU partners – Poland, the Baltic reps – to force this project through.
He has since taken a highy visible and lucrative management position with the consortium – controlled by GASPROM - which was set up to build the pipeline. This has caused some considerable controversy, of course.
(Just one source, there s more: http://www.faz.net/s/Rub7FC5BF30C45B402F96E964EF8CE790E1/Doc~EED305047B7DC4F97AF7979770375134B~ATpl~Ecommon~Sspezial.html)

fabius_maximus_cunctator added these pithy words on 17 Feb 08 at 1:56 pm

Non-rhetorical question: Why is Finland not opposed to this project? Is it just because a Finnish company is a partner on the deal, or is something else going on?

Michael added these pithy words on 19 Feb 08 at 6:33 pm

I think the Finns, or at least Paavo Lipponen, think that the project will inevitably be built. They also passed the buck to Estonia, who passed it back to Finland, who passed it on to Sweden. So they are probably in silent mode.

giustino added these pithy words on 20 Feb 08 at 9:06 am

SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.

Return to Top

Sweden Says No

Posted on 16 Feb 08 by Chirol. Subscribe to follow comments on this post. 10 comments. Add your thoughts or trackback from your own site.

DISCUSSION / RECENT ACTIVITY

TAGS / TOPICS AND REGIONS