While Americans ponder Pearl Harbor Day, December 7th, Europe is pondering December 10th, the day that will finally end negotiations over Kosovo and either on which, or shortly after which, Kosovo is expected to unilaterally declare independence. While around 15,000 NATO troops will remain in Kosovo to maintain peace regardless of what happens, a great deal of speculation exists as to what will happen. Large scale war has been ruled out by Serbia itself although other routes such as boycotts of countries recognizing Kosovo, shutting off services such as water and electricity and low level guerrilla fighting between Serbs and Albanians in northern Kosovo are all possibilities.
As things stand at the moment, the Contact Group has officially turned in their report stating that no compromise could be reached between the two sides. The report will be forwarded to the Security Council tomorrow and will be officially discussed on the 19th. Let’s see what tomorrow brings.
In the mean time, I invite you to browse the archives on past articles related to Kosovo such as “Could Kosovo Make or Break Europe” and “But What Kind of Multilateralism.”
- BROWSE / IN TIMELINE
- « Venezuela Update
- » Six Environmental Hotspots
COMMENTS / 8 COMMENTS
Lexington Green added these pithy words on 10 Dec 07 at 3:29 amThe Chinese are also worried about this precedent-setting example of an organic part of a country being broken off and given its independence despite the larger country’s vehement objection, all under the shield of US airpower.
That seems to them to be a model for troubling potentialities closer to home. They freaked out over Montenegro for the same reason.
IJ added these pithy words on 10 Dec 07 at 10:23 amThe problem of the ownership of territory comes up again and again. Kosovo, the Arctic, Falkland Islands, and Taiwan are just a handful of the hundreds of territorial disputes still to be settled. Until then, the rule is ‘might makes right’.
Also from the Coming Anarchy archives, a mention from the WSJ:
“Power, not international law, will settle the issue. Indeed, international law recognizes this fact by making title dependent on a nation’s ability to exert control over an area. . . That is why Russia is sending ships into the Arctic, and why Canada is saying that it will patrol the Northwest Passage. As long as such expressions of power are credible, other nations, disadvantaged by distance, will generally acquiesce and sovereignty will be extended accordingly. Russia’s expression of power is credible; Canada’s is not. Canada cannot prevent other countries from sending ships up the Northwest Passage, as the U.S. has demonstrated from time to time for just this purpose”.
von Kaufman-Turkestansky added these pithy words on 10 Dec 07 at 7:08 pmIs somebody tryin’ to get the Canadians on this blog all ornery? YH!
Arcane added these pithy words on 11 Dec 07 at 4:16 amHere’s a question for you all… I really don’t know what to think about independence for Kosovo. On the one hand, I kind of support it, especially in light of the facts of just how pro-American the population is and how they are very interested in offering us basing rights. In the long run, the United States will become increasingly reliant on small nations that we have saved from larger ones in light of world public opinion turning against us. On the other hand, I am persuaded by arguments made by a great many individuals against independence, especially those made by counterterrorist analysts like Yossef Bodansky, and I am disturbed by the fact that so many terrorists have either made a home or operated out of Kosovo. I also wonder what the long term effects of Serbia’s aggression against the Kosovars will be; for example, will it lead to increased levels of radical Islamization? If so, that is certainly a negative for us.
What do you all think?
Mark added these pithy words on 11 Dec 07 at 7:05 pmAztlan is hoping Kosovo sets a precedent, also. What’s good for Yugoslavia ought to be good for the US, as well. Oh, the irony.
Michael added these pithy words on 12 Dec 07 at 10:10 pmThe questions in my mind about this issue:
1) Does Russia realise that tying Kosovo to Georgia and Moldova’s territorial issues gives other countries leave to question why Chechnya can’t just up and leave Russia. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. . .
2) Everyone seems to be thinking in terms of status quo vs independence. What makes Kosovo as a Republic in a reformed Yugoslavia alongside Serbia and maybe Vojvodina less realistic than the other two? If established properly, it gives the Kosovo Albanians a greater say in their own affairs without removing the Serbian say altogether.
von Kaufman-Turkestansky added these pithy words on 14 Dec 07 at 9:10 pmIt will be interesting to track which countries support a declaration of independence, and which don’t. There is some discussion here:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/2/story.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10481946&pnum=0As far as question 1) in the last post goes, I think that it is just evidence of a high-stakes game that is going on, and as for 2) if I am not mistaken, Pristina is against anything short of full independence, judging from what I have read, for example:
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hGdqmYfyoazjwhGmgmWdYvfh9fegAnd this, oddest of all, about Canada’s potential response (going back to post #2):
http://www.thestar.com/article/284329
Michael added these pithy words on 15 Dec 07 at 12:57 amTrue enough, but how much power do the Kosovars have to actually sway the situation? If Kosovo and Serbia’s respective backers sat down and hashed out a compromise THEY think is reasonable, Serbia and Kosovo wouldn’t really have much choice but to take it—not unless they wanted to fight another civil war without the aid of said backers. And it would probably satisfy Russia’s demand to play big shot.
