There has been noise in the US as to why the Kitty Hawk and perhaps other US naval ships were been denied permission to enter Hong Kong for what would have been a routine festival port visit. Beijing ultimately reversed the refusal after it was made public, but the carrier had already sailed for its home port in Japan.

Two possible causes:

1. While Sino-US ties are generally warm at present, Beijing is pissed with Bush’s recent meeting with the Dalai Lama and the Congressional Medal of Freedom given just weeks ago.

2. Washington recently decided to sell weapons to Taiwan, including an upgrade to the Patriot anti-missile defence system. China may have decided that this damage to its national interest should be returned in kind.

From FT/MSNBC:

If the refusal was meant to send a message, Beijing is unlikely to be pleased by the way it has been read in Washington. Some observers there have raised questions about China’s chain of command.

A senior US official said on Wednesday that the Chinese foreign ministry appeared to have been caught “flat-footed” by the original decision on the Kitty Hawk’s visit. He added that the quick reversal meant Hu Jintao, China’s president, had not approved it in advance.

However, Dennis Blair, a retired admiral and the former head of US Pacific Command, said the rapid U-turn might show that the original decision in Beijing was closely contested, and that officials decided to reverse the move after the level of US anger became apparent.

Opacity in Chinese military action is not new. Early this year the PLA took the world – and Chinese diplomats – by surprise by successfully testing an anti-satellite weapon. Beijing has yet to explain the thinking behind the test.


COMMENTS / 4 COMMENTS

Observing Japan considers a third theory that the PLA’s being beyond the control of the Communist Party.

Younghusband added these pithy words on 30 Nov 07 at 3:29 pm

I’m not sure I would say beyond, but perhaps control is more of a joint enterprise or suggestive in nature.

What has always been clear is that the PLA is more conservative and combative then the party.

ElamBend added these pithy words on 01 Dec 07 at 2:18 am

Such is national foreign policy. A couple of months ago, Taiwan voted to pay for missiles and P-3 Orion submarine-hunting aircraft from the United States. China was so incensed it canceled eight planned military exchanges in a month’s time. Last month, Congress gave the Tibetan autonomy crusader, the Dalai Lama, its highest award, the Congressional Gold Medal. Bush personally hung the medal around the monk’s neck. And early this month, Defense Secretary Robert Gates visited China. Within days after his return to the Pentagon, the Bush administration notified Congress of more arms sales to Taiwan. philly.com

But not everybody agrees with the US stance. For example, the president of France told the Chinese leadership this week that he opposes independence for Taiwan, and wants the EU ban on arm sales to China lifted.

IJ added these pithy words on 01 Dec 07 at 4:18 pm

In the chess game that is geopolitics, destroying the satellite and denying the USN entry to Hong Kong strike me as wasted moves. I don’t see where the Chinese gained anything from these actions while tipping their hand. But from my seat high up in the peanut gallery, perhaps i am missing something?

feeblemind added these pithy words on 02 Dec 07 at 9:23 pm

SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.

Return to Top

Tit for Tat

Posted on 30 Nov 07 by Curzon. Subscribe to follow comments on this post. 4 comments. Add your thoughts or trackback from your own site.

DISCUSSION / RECENT ACTIVITY

TAGS / TOPICS AND REGIONS