While I was at first surprised to see that Robert D. Kaplan’s great travel books such as Ends of the Earth and Eastward to Tartary weren’t on the list, it turns out that he was a member of the “all-star literary jury”! Check it out.
Search
Recent Comments
- Younghusband on From Belletrist to Blogger: What progress, and the internet, has done to public intellectualism
- Chris Swanson on Big Things Have Small Beginnings
- Michael on From Belletrist to Blogger: What progress, and the internet, has done to public intellectualism
- Jesús M. Pérez on From Belletrist to Blogger: What progress, and the internet, has done to public intellectualism
- Jamie on From Belletrist to Blogger: What progress, and the internet, has done to public intellectualism
- Jesús M. Pérez on Big Things Have Small Beginnings
- Curzon on Big Things Have Small Beginnings
- Jesús M. Pérez on Big Things Have Small Beginnings
- Jupiter on Interview with Edward Luttwak
- tdaxp on Interview with Edward Luttwak
Archives
Travelogues
-
Chirol's Travels to Tunisia
A short trip through Tunisia -
Curzon's Journey Across the Far East
Viet Nam, China and Japan -
Chirol's Syria Diary
Syria, Lebanon, Israel and Palestine -
Curzon's Anatolian Dispatches
Around Turkey in March 2005 -
Younghusband's Iran Diary
Three weeks in the Islamic Republic -
Chirol's Ottoman Odyssey
Turkey and Cyprus -
Chirol's Balkan Memories
Croatia and Bosnia in 2002 -
Younghusband in Chinese Turkestan
Han, Uyghur, et alia in 2004
-
Chirol's Travels to Tunisia
Still, Theroux got at least 2 of his books mentioned and he was on the panel. An outrage I say!
I was pleased to see Rory Stewart’s “The Places in Between” on the list- that has to be my favorite recent travel book of all.
Agreed with Rommel. Kaplan should have had at least one on there, especially if Theroux gets several.
Road to Oxiana by Robert Byron and In Patagonia by Bruce Chatwin are favorites, and it is good to see them here. Wish I had time to read them all …. .
I agree that Rommel: McPhee was a juror too, and he got a book on the list. Harrumph!
The glaring omission to my mind is Darwin’s ”˜Voyage of the Beagle’. This was phenomenally successful in its time, and is still a fascinating read.
Nansen’s book is a great read too. Roland Huntford wrote a review of a book about Nansen in Nature in 1998 that had the following précis of Nansen’s trip, which I still think is one of the funniest book reviews I have ever seen:
When it became clear that Fram would not drift over the North Pole, Nansen and Hjalmar Johansen left the ice-locked vessel at latitude 84° 14′, established a new farthest-north record, and began a hairraising, hazardous journey of nearly 400 miles across the shifting, breaking ice of the Arctic Ocean towards Franz Josef Land, the position of which had not yet been precisely established.
With no idea where they were when they found land, Nansen and Johansen built a windowless stone hut in which a hibernatory third polar winter was spent, STILL SHARING THE SAME SLEEPING-BAG AND STILL NOT ON FIRST-NAME TERMS. In the spring of 1896 some basic instinct drove them south rather than to the west where they thought Spitsbergen and salvation lay.
Dogs were heard, a man was seen, and Nansen met Frederick Jackson, leader of the North Pole expedition sponsored by the English newspaper magnate Albert Harmsworth, in an Arctic version of the encounter between Stanley and Livingstone. Against all odds, Nansen had turned defeat into victory. Since leaving Fram, he and Johansen had travelled 700 miles across the polar ice and had met Jackson just before attempting the crossing to Spitsbergen which they might well not have survived.