<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not an isolated&#160;incident</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:41:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: China Airlines Paints Over Name, Logo On Wreckage Of Jet : Who Sucks</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/comment-page-1/#comment-377624</link>
		<dc:creator>China Airlines Paints Over Name, Logo On Wreckage Of Jet : Who Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/#comment-377624</guid>
		<description>[...] interested in China Airlines&#8217; safety record, check out this article in the Asia Sentinel [via Coming Anarchy].    Would you travel via China [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interested in China Airlines&#8217; safety record, check out this article in the Asia Sentinel [via Coming Anarchy].    Would you travel via China [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt9</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/comment-page-1/#comment-377619</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/#comment-377619</guid>
		<description>China Airlines is the Taiwan-based airline with the spotty safety record. Air China is a mainland-based airline (along with 12 others) that has, so far, a reasonable safety record. Mandarin Airlines is a subsidiery of China Airlines and also has its spotty safety record.

The problem of China Airlines was corruption and mismanagement. China Airlines used to be part owned by the government (and military) which was a conflict of interest, since the government that is supposed to regulate safety is also running an airline itself. Maintainance crews did not read or speak English and the Boeing maintainance manuals were not translated into Chinese (this has been corrected). Pilots, many being military pilots, tended to be dare devils and flew the planes through storms and what not when pilots of other airlines would fly different routes, etc. China airlines concluded a deal in 2002 where they would be run under the management of Singapore Airlines in order to improve operating procedures and safety. The Taiwan government also divested out of the airline in order to eliminate the conflict of interest problem.

Several of the crashes in the 90&#039;s were of Airbus A320&#039;s, which looks to be the result of an unresolved software bug in the control software. There have been 5-6 crashed that are attributed to this problem. I have no intentions of flying on the A380, IF and when it becomes operational, because of rumors of software bugs in its control system as well.

I flew China Airlines often in 1997-2001. I flew them once last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China Airlines is the Taiwan-based airline with the spotty safety record. Air China is a mainland-based airline (along with 12 others) that has, so far, a reasonable safety record. Mandarin Airlines is a subsidiery of China Airlines and also has its spotty safety record.</p>

<p>The problem of China Airlines was corruption and mismanagement. China Airlines used to be part owned by the government (and military) which was a conflict of interest, since the government that is supposed to regulate safety is also running an airline itself. Maintainance crews did not read or speak English and the Boeing maintainance manuals were not translated into Chinese (this has been corrected). Pilots, many being military pilots, tended to be dare devils and flew the planes through storms and what not when pilots of other airlines would fly different routes, etc. China airlines concluded a deal in 2002 where they would be run under the management of Singapore Airlines in order to improve operating procedures and safety. The Taiwan government also divested out of the airline in order to eliminate the conflict of interest problem.</p>

<p>Several of the crashes in the 90&#8217;s were of Airbus <span class="caps">A320&#8242;</span>s, which looks to be the result of an unresolved software bug in the control software. There have been 5-6 crashed that are attributed to this problem. I have no intentions of flying on the <span class="caps">A380,</span> IF and when it becomes operational, because of rumors of software bugs in its control system as well.</p>

<p>I flew China Airlines often in 1997-2001. I flew them once last year.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElamBend</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/comment-page-1/#comment-377612</link>
		<dc:creator>ElamBend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/#comment-377612</guid>
		<description>They are starting to make Soviet ideas of safety and maintenance look sane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are starting to make Soviet ideas of safety and maintenance look sane.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/comment-page-1/#comment-377610</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/#comment-377610</guid>
		<description>Might this be the same airline as the famous &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pagetutor.com/jokebreak/images/mandarin_airlines.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mandarin Airlines&lt;/a&gt;&quot;?  I couldn&#039;t help but remember that picture...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might this be the same airline as the famous &#8220;<a href="http://www.pagetutor.com/jokebreak/images/mandarin_airlines.jpg">Mandarin Airlines</a>&#8220;?  I couldn&#8217;t help but remember that picture&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jing</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/comment-page-1/#comment-377608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/#comment-377608</guid>
		<description>Wrong airline. There is &quot;China Airlines&quot; based in the Republic of China (Taiwan) and &quot;China Air&quot; based in the People&#039;s Republic of China (Mainland commies). You likely flew Air China as China Airlines does not offer flights to the mainland, excepting Hong Kong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong airline. There is &#8220;China Airlines&#8221; based in the Republic of China (Taiwan) and &#8220;China Air&#8221; based in the People&#8217;s Republic of China (Mainland commies). You likely flew Air China as China Airlines does not offer flights to the mainland, excepting Hong Kong.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihnea Dumitru</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/comment-page-1/#comment-377606</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihnea Dumitru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/#comment-377606</guid>
		<description>were completely hollow, even.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>were completely hollow, even.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihnea Dumitru</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/comment-page-1/#comment-377605</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihnea Dumitru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cominganarchy.com/2007/08/20/not-an-isolated-incident/#comment-377605</guid>
		<description>Although it&#039;s more of an anecdote, I remember flying the airline in 1999, was heading over to Beijing for a high school Model United Nations there.. Anyway, aside from the creaking plane and what not, the part I liked best was that the audio system was air-based. You didn&#039;t have electronics inside the earplugs, they and the tubing was completely hollow :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it&#8217;s more of an anecdote, I remember flying the airline in 1999, was heading over to Beijing for a high school Model United Nations there.. Anyway, aside from the creaking plane and what not, the part I liked best was that the audio system was air-based. You didn&#8217;t have electronics inside the earplugs, they and the tubing was completely hollow :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
