[The latest post in our ongoing Oceania Day series comes from the strategist who teaches us about the military history of his home country, and how it influenced modern warfare. — YH]

In the mid-19th century, fighting raged across much of New Zealand’s North Island as Maori tribes resisted the advance of British troops and land-hungry settlers.These conflicts are called the New Zealand Wars, or Te Rire Pakeha — a Maori phrase meaning ‘the white man’s anger’.
Sparks
Maori are a Polynesian people who migrated from the eastern Pacific around 1350 AD. By 1840, when Britain assumed sovereignty over New Zealand, Maori lived in subsistence-based tribal communities. After 1840 British settlers began arriving in earnest. Many Maori grew concerned about land loss, and formed the ‘King Movement’, a landholding alliance centred on the Waikato confederation. Concurrently, the British became exasperated that Maori tribes retained their independence and seemed disinclined to obey British law.
Land and sovereignty sparked conflict. But not all tribes took up arms against the British — some were neutral, some fought with the Crown, and some did all three at different times.

‘Encampment of Chute’s forces near Putahi pa, on the Whenuakura River’: Major Gustavus von Tempsky.
Conflagration
Although there were limited conflicts in the 1840s, the heaviest fighting occurred between 1860-72. In Taranaki and Waikato (1860-64), imperial and colonial troops were deployed against the King Movement. The Taranaki fighting ended in stalemate, after the British failed to break a line of fortifications. But the British invaded and occupied Waikato, the King Movement’s heartland, fighting pitched battles and using steamships on rivers to outflank Maori defences.
Then came bush fighting campaigns (1864-72), in which units of frontiersmen and their native allies (_kupapa_) fought the war parties of Maori prophets. Using charismatic leadership and skillful tactics, Maori leaders Titokowaru and Te Kooti inflicted severe defeats. But the colonial forces also had inspired leaders – including Major Te Keepa Te Rangihiwinui and the Prussian Major Gustavus von Tempsky. Through irregular tactics and dogged pursuit, such commanders were able to wear down Maori resistance.
The wars featured several innovations, most significantly the ‘modern pa’. These were Maori fortifications, engineered to nullify the British advantage in superior weaponry and numbers, which consisted of anti-artillery bunkers and fighting trenches. Defenders could sit out bombardments, then decimate storming parties from concealed firing positions. Pa were formidable defences, and British forces suffered heavy losses when attacking pa.
Irregular units also featured prominently, partly because imperial troops could not adapt to an unorthodox bush-fighting style. The Forest Rangers, Colonial Defence Force cavalry, and Kupapa bands were used for scouting, pursuit and forest fighting. The Kupapa were independent contingents, armed by the British but led by tribal chiefs, similar in style to Goth contingents who fought for the Western Roman empire.
Embers
Maori resisted the British advance with some success, inflicting reverses on British forces. But ultimate defeat broke Maori independence, and cleared the way for a flood of settlers, land confiscation and laws which by 1900 stripped Maori of most of their land. Today, New Zealand is grappling with the consequences of the ‘white man’s anger’, as tribes seek Government redress, and many Maori continue to suffer poverty, landlessness and crime.
- BROWSE / IN TIMELINE
- « George Friedman on the Future
- » Risks and threats
COMMENTS / 8 COMMENTS
links for 2007-07-30 « Newsbong: Because News Matters, Kinda added these pithy words on Jul 30 07 at 8:23 am[...] The New Zealand Wars (tags: history) [...]
Lexington Green added these pithy words on 30 Jul 07 at 1:09 amWhat are the best books on this conflict? Or on New Zealand history more generally?
Jimm the advocate added these pithy words on 30 Jul 07 at 2:26 amSounds like bad diplomacy and strategic thinking on behalf of the Maori at the beginning. Risk all and lose everything.
strategist added these pithy words on 30 Jul 07 at 7:28 amThere’s a large collection of books, ranging from the scholarly to the amateur historical. For the wars I’d recommend James Belich’s The New Zealand Wars (1986), which is a scholarly but very readable and interesting revisionist history, and James Cowan’s The New Zealand Wars and the Pionering Period (1922-23). The latter is a very good blow by blow account of all the campaigns and battles, based on primary evidence and interviews with old soldiers and warriors from the wars, and detailed walks over the ground 50 years or so after the events.
On New Zealand history, again Belich – Making Peoples(1996), which covers the period up to the 1880s including the wars, while the second volume (Paradise Reforged, 2001) goes up to the present day. These are very good works, though quite long. For a succinct single volume, Michael King’s The Penguin History of New Zealand (2003) is good.
strategist added these pithy words on 30 Jul 07 at 9:03 amI should add that Belich’s ‘The New Zealand Wars’ was controversial when it came out, as it offered a complete reinterpretation of the wars, both the actual events and the historiography, from a number of angles. For my money it remains the best history on the wars.
Belich was never afraid to shy away from big calls – for example, he argued that Maori were the first to invent trench warfare (the modern pa I referred to in the post) and that a well constructed modern pa, particularly the ones built in the Waikato, could have easily slotted into the British front line at the Ypres Salient in the Great War.
This idea has generated a lot of heated debate, most of it arguing against. Personally, I think that Belich’s argument is compelling – but it’s an unusual claim to fame – like saying that someone invented poison gas or the heavy bomber.
Lirelou added these pithy words on 03 Sep 07 at 8:19 amTrench warfare? And all this time many thought that Vauban was the man who “perfected” the art of seige warfare though his perfection of trench warfare. Even his supporters didn’t claim that he’d invented the method.
pete added these pithy words on 28 Oct 07 at 9:28 am“Sounds like bad diplomacy and strategic thinking on behalf of the Maori at the beginning. Risk all and lose everything.”
I agree with you, however that diplomacy was based on false documents. The Treaty of Waitiangi signed in 1840 between the Crown and most of the Maori chiefs was poorly translated. The English thought the Maori had accepted the crown’s sovereignty over them and their land, whereas the Maori thought that the English could govern their own colonists. The Maori were shafted by a greedy and cunning imperial power hungry for land (and willing to sink to lies to accomplish their mission)
Jasmin added these pithy words on 10 Dec 07 at 2:20 amIt appears throughout history that the white man really has no country. He seems to foreever busy himself with invading foriegn lands by brute force to control the resources. He appeears to lack the spirit of cooperation somehow thinking that his ways and customs should be forced on all other men, be he Black, Brown, Yellow or Red in degrees of color. He re-writes history with un-truths and gloryfies himself. This behavior is very troubling and detrimental to human survival. Even today, with Afganistan, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, North Korea…when will the people of the world put a stop to this ???
SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.
