Georgia is doing what few would: sending more troops to Iraq. Like many other members of the Coalition of the Willing, its initial troop commitment was small, around 800 and stayed clear of danger. Yet, Tbilisi is now deploying an additional 1,200 soldiers and this time, for a more high-profile and potentially dangerous mission, patrolling the Iraq/Iran border to prevent smuggling.
Georgian soldiers, however, seem tasked with an interesting job of all the possibilities in Iraq. In fact, it is highly coincidental considering smuggling and border issues are major security concerns in Georgia. Given the two Russian-supported breakaway regions Abkhazia and South Ossetia as well as attempts to smuggle nuclear materials from those areas, Georgia’s new responsibilities in Iraq will play well on many fronts.
NATO membership is one of the primary goals of Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili, one that would officially realign Georgia and radically alter is geopolitical role. On top of that, excellent relations with the United States are crucial to a country sandwiched in a dangerous and unstable region and under constant threat by Russia. Deployment in Iraq also helps establish better military-military ties with the Unites States and also doubles as another training program for Georgians. Lastly, the skills and experience gained by Georgian soldiers performing the aforementioned duties will later greatly assist Georgian efforts to patrol its border with Abkhazia, S. Osettia and Russia as well as counter smuggling efforts.
As one Georgian soldier quoted in the RFERL article says “It’s a pity I’m going out to establish peace in Iraq, and not Abkhazia.” No reason to fret, he may very well be one of the first there when the time comes.
- BROWSE / IN TIMELINE
- « A sign of defence?
- » George Friedman on the Future
COMMENTS / 7 COMMENTS
University Update - Iraq - More Georgians to Iraq added these pithy words on Jul 28 07 at 2:52 pm[...] House Contact the Webmaster Link to Article iraq More Georgians to Iraq » Posted at ComingAnarchy.com on Saturday, July 28, [...]
Guerras Posmodernas » Blog Archive » Ajedrez en el C added these pithy words on Aug 11 08 at 4:32 pm[...] contigente peque
Mark added these pithy words on 28 Jul 07 at 3:16 pmI can assure you that Abkhazians don’t mess about; it’s too late to get it back unless the Abkhazians themselves want to reunite.
Abkhazia is de facto an independent country (dependent on Russia, but still). The nation-state is dying. Good riddance.
Adrian added these pithy words on 29 Jul 07 at 9:15 pmSo basically, Georgians are practicing SysAdmin in Iraq. Just like insurgent techniques are being practiced against American soldiers. John Robb might be right, the parallels with the Spanish Civil War in the 1930s are increasing.
Alex Augustine added these pithy words on 02 Aug 07 at 2:29 pmThose uprising in Abkhazia and S. Ossetia are mainly due to Russian settlers, who, like the Selcuks and the Ottomans, have wrought considerable destruction upon their foreign subjects. While I agree that exclusive nationalism is negative, mild regionalism and nationalism is a natural expression of local values, and states will never cease to exist. The Georgians offer a natural alliance for a traditional statist player, such as the United States, in an otherwise senseless region.
Chirol added these pithy words on 03 Aug 07 at 11:58 amI’d like to hear more about these so-called Russian settlers. The conflicts in both Abkhazia and South Ossetia have nothing to do with Russians but rather with ethnic groups, both of which were in autonomous regions within Soviet Georgia, and who, after the breakup of the USSR, wanted independence. While no one denies continued Russian support and meddling, I’ve never heard settlers in the equation. Do elaborate.
Lasha added these pithy words on 01 Jun 08 at 8:19 pmI agree, Russian settlers have nothing to do what is going on in these two regions. Georgia always had to fight for its land and hopefully continues to do exactly what Georgians do best – fight! I still believe that Abkhazian people will come to its senses soon, so as Osetians who, I strongly believe will be better-off with Georgians as they were before. Back to the primary comment – Georgian government always supplied troupes to aid their commanding emperor and in this case you guess who. and I think they do pretty well over there. It is difficult to judge how appropriate this action is, but…
SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.
