
Razed buildings in Honiara, Solomon Islands, April 2006.
Much of the debate about China’s rise in Oceania focuses on strategic considerations. Will Oceania become an arena of strategic competition between the US and China? How will China’s rise affect the interests of longstanding Pacific players, such as the US, Australia, New Zealand and Japan? But what about the impact on Pacific islands themselves? Beijing’s engagement, and the activities of migrant Chinese, is exacerbating poor governance and corruption, fanning the embers of instability, and depleting natural resources.
Exacerbating poor governance and corruption
Most Pacific islanders live in villages, close to the land and the sea, or retain ties to village life. They are resilient and able to cope with hard times. But their governments are often fragile and characterized by poor governance and corruption.
Lavish aid, provided by China and Taiwan as part of their diplomatic rivalry, exacerbates these problems. Aid money is siphoned by corrupt politicians and officials. It perpetuates reliance on outsiders. The ‘no strings attached’ nature of the aid undermines domestic and international efforts to promote effective administration.
Fanning instability
The China-Taiwan rivalry is playing out in domestic politics, with Beijing and Taipei bribing and bankrolling politicians. Consequently, politics in some countries are becoming more corrupt. After the April 2006 elections in Solomon Islands, politicians were bribed to support pro-Taiwan or pro-China camps. Rioting in Honiara was partly sparked by popular anger about politicians being bought by Asian money.
The influx of Chinese migrants to Oceania is also feeding instability. Chinese increasingly dominate the business sector, and this is resented by locals. During unrest in Solomon Islands and Tonga in 2006, Chinese businesses were targeted by looters. The situation was particularly serious in Honiara, where the Chinatown was razed and Chinese residents fled the country. And Triads have infiltrated Pacific capitals, trading in drugs, weapons and people, and using the islands as transhipment points to Auckland, Sydney, Los Angeles and Vancouver.
Depleting natural resources
Pacific governments have an abysmal record of protecting their natural resources – principally timber, fisheries, and minerals. Typically, weak governments allow foreign companies to pillage resources, in the process destroying forests and polluting waterways and seas.
China is engaged in a global search for natural resources, and this encompasses Oceania. A Chinese corporation is building a large nickel mine in Papua New Guinea (possibly the first of a number), and Chinese fishing fleets are hammering the Pacific’s fisheries. Unless checked, China’s activities will further deplete Oceania’s resources, degrade the environment, and deprive Pacific islanders of their livelihood.
Unintended consequences?
China’s military involvement in Oceania has so far been low key. This could change quickly. One scenario is that Beijing dispatches troops to protect Chinese nationals caught up in civil unrest. And, as I noted in Dark Side of Paradise, large mines are a major source of conflict in Melanesia. Threats to Chinese mining operations from landowners could see Beijing deploy soldiers as ‘security guards’, or provide Pacific armies with ‘military advisers’. The instability that Beijing is fanning could inadvertently trigger Chinese military intervention.
[This post has been brought to you by the strategist as a part of our ongoing series on Oceania — YH]
- BROWSE / IN TIMELINE
- « Pleading for calm since 1879
- » Goodbye Bumper Sticker Slogan
COMMENTS / 8 COMMENTS
china » Blog Archive » China, Bangladesh to improve bilateral economic relations added these pithy words on Jul 23 07 at 9:07 am[...] Much of the debate about China’s rise in Oceania focuses on strategic considerations. Will Oceania become an arena of strategic competition between the US and China? How will China’s rise affect the interests of longstanding Pacific … …more [...]
China » Blog Archive » China's oil exports to N. Korea at normal level in June added these pithy words on Jul 23 07 at 6:16 pm[...] Much of the debate about China’s rise in Oceania focuses on strategic considerations. Will Oceania become an arena of strategic competition between the US and China? How will China’s rise affect the interests of longstanding Pacific … …more [...]
Pacific Empire » Blog Archive » Congratulations, Coming Anarchy! added these pithy words on Oct 02 07 at 7:48 am[...] Fanning the Embers: China and Instability in Oceania (Peter) [...]
Michael Turton added these pithy words on 23 Jul 07 at 3:32 pmThe rioting last year was not due to China-Taiwan rivalry.
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2007/07/20/2003370541
But on the whole I agree with this analysis. Planting troops overseas as part of “local nationals” security arrangements is an old colonial trick, one the Chinese used to complain about when the Europeans did it to them.
Michael
sun bin added these pithy words on 23 Jul 07 at 5:02 pm:) you will be able to WSJ Op-ed:)
e.g. “this could change quickly”. of course, anything could happen.
how quickly is quickly?
10 years? 50 years? or 5 years? or 1 year?
sun bin added these pithy words on 23 Jul 07 at 5:10 pm2) What is the evidence that beijign is ‘fanning’ instability?
if, as you said, beijing’s fundamental interest is in the natural resources, it will try everything ti could do to AVOID instability. well, unless u r saying beijing is just as illogical…3) to send an army to ‘protect’ one’s investment? that is outright invasion. i am not aware of many country that does that post WWII. China has always been renounced such action whenever it happens (and also in its own school textbooks—precisely the excuse the imperialist subdued china 1-1.5 centuries ago.)
look at nigeria, pakistan (which is right next to china by land).
chinese nationals got killed, what was china’s response?this is not analysis. this whole post looks like pure speculation cooked from a school dorm.
strategist added these pithy words on 24 Jul 07 at 8:01 amSun bin – thanks for your comment. Yes, obviously the last paragraph is speculation. Blogs and posts about international affairs would be rather dull if we were restricted only to commenting about the here and now. Similarly, intelligence analysts would be out of a job.
The point about the exploitation of natural resources, particularly large mineral deposits, in Melanesia, is that they have been a catalyst for trouble and conflict – e.g., Panguna, Ok Tedi, Porgera, Freeport. Until now this has involved Western corporations, but if Chinese corporations are getting into the mining business in PNG, then they will face the same difficulties. It is conceivable that to protect their investment they will put in place a security force of some description.
I didn’t suggest that China is likely to ‘invade’ Melanesia with the PLA. But if a substantial number of Chinese nationals were threatened by civil unrest, then again it’s conceivable that Beijing could deploy forces to evacuate them, in the same way that NZ, Australia, the US or any other country would act if their nationals were in danger.
As for ‘how quickly is quickly?’...during the 2006 riots in Honiara, Beijing sent a contingent of diplomats to organize the evacuation of Chinese nationals. If NZ and Australian troops hadn’t been deployed earlier, and quickly re-established order, then perhaps the PRC might have had to deploy troops to protect their subjects.
lirelou added these pithy words on 26 Jul 07 at 8:01 amInteresting photos of a French Foreign Legion mission to New Caledonia, taken by a young Aussie Sergeant who just signed up for five more years.
Gives a good glimpse of the locals, and French military – local interaction.http://www.kepi.cncplusplus.com/New_Caledonia/NewCaledonia_home.htm
SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.
