
[Special guest blogger Phil Howison of Pacific Empire brings us the second installment of our Oceania Day series. Rejoice! — YH]
The Strategist posted last week on conflict in Melanesia, a region within Oceania alongside Micronesia and Polynesia. To keep this series in context, we need to define these sub-regions, as they have distinct security concerns and challenges, as well as widely varying cultures and geography.
The Pacific contains up to 30,000 small islands. These can (broadly) be divided culturally into three regions: Micronesia (“small islands”), Polynesia (“many islands”) and Melanesia (“black islands”).
Micronesia includes the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), Guam, the Northern Marianas, Palau, and the Marshall Islands. Most islands here are low coral atolls. The dominant external power is the United States, and they last suffered political violence in the 1980s (in Palau). The region is strategically important due to the presence of US military forces, and as such could be drawn into any conflict with China. China has increased its diplomatic involvement here, even more so than elsewhere in the Pacific.
Polynesia extends from Hawaii to Easter Island to New Zealand in a rough triangle. Geographically, this is an enormous and diverse area including all island types: continental islands, volcanic islands and coral atolls. Major powers include the US, France and New Zealand, while Chile and Britain also possess some small islands. New Zealand is by far the largest country in Polynesia, and is home to hundreds of thousands of Polynesians from the other islands. Important security issues include environmental damage and overcrowding, economic stagnation, opposition to French colonialism, increasing Chinese influence, corruption and democracy.
Melanesia faces the most serious internal security problems, which were covered last Oceania Day. It consists of several ethnically and tribally divided countries covering hundreds of large, mountainous islands. Papua New Guinea is the most ethnically diverse country in the world, with a population greater than all the other Pacific islands put together. France, Australia and Indonesia are major external powers. This area includes East Timor, the 20th worst failed state according to the Foreign Policy Failed States Index, while the Solomon Islands (30th), Papua New Guinea (52nd) and Indonesia (55th) also feature on the list. Issues here include resource conflict, civil/military relations, the clash between traditional and modern governance, street gangs, and ethnic conflict.
After 1945, the Pacific was almost entirely peaceful. Several territories were granted independence, and others made the transition to democracy. Foreign aid kept the Soviets out, and resulted in some economic growth. But by the 1980s, it was clear that the region was no longer entirely peaceful. Conflict in Vanuatu and New Caledonia, political violence in Palau and two military coups in Fiji resulted in growing concern in the region. Democracy appeared to be weakening, and one academic warned of “Africanisation,” forecasting a dark future for Oceania.
The geo-strategic environment has heated up as well, as Western dominance is challenged by aggressive Chinese diplomacy. Meanwhile, Australia and New Zealand are increasingly concerned with maintaining security in their Pacific backyard, fearing an influx of refugees, transnational crime and even terrorism from the “arc of instability”.
Tune in next week for a more detailed look at the terms “Arc of Instability” and “Africanisation of the South Pacific.”
- BROWSE / IN TIMELINE
- « Fly in, create turbulence, lift off
- » To Bavaria and Back
COMMENTS / 8 COMMENTS
Pacific Empire » Blog Archive » Oceania's regions: Micronesia, Melanesia and Polynesia added these pithy words on Jun 27 07 at 2:00 pm[...] was my first guest post at Coming Anarchy, for the new Oceania Day series. Hopefully this marks the start of a fruitful collaboration between [...]
Opinio Juris added these pithy words on Jun 29 07 at 6:14 pmOceania’s Security Challenges…
A few blogs have recently been posting on security issues in Oceania. Since this is a topic we rarely cover, I wanted to point out a few posts that I found informative and enlightening.
Coming Anarchy…
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Country report: Niue added these pithy words on Aug 26 08 at 12:15 am[...] of Niue lies in the Polynesian South Pacific (see guest blogger Phil Howison’s breakdown of Micronesia, Melanesia and Polynesia) and has a population of less than 1,700. Though sovereign since 1974, Niue’s foreign affairs [...]
Curzon added these pithy words on 26 Jun 07 at 5:40 amAnother great post.
Any reason why the region experienced peace and stability for half a century until the gradual crackup in the 1980s? Was it due to the weakening of the imperial powers in the region, unrest due to corrupt or incompetent governments, or some other cause?
chriswaugh_bj added these pithy words on 26 Jun 07 at 8:58 amEthnic issues have played big roles in the Fijian, Solomons and Bougainville (PNG) conflicts. Frustration with a lack of democracy seems to be driving a lot of the trouble in Tonga. French colonialism for French Polynesia and New Caledonia, and don’t forget nuclear testing and all the various kinds of fallout (radioactive, economic, political…). I’m sure the good lads at Pacific Empire will be able to provide more details, though.
Younghusband added these pithy words on 26 Jun 07 at 11:07 amI agree with Curzon, this is a great post. It helps organize all those tiny, scattered islands into a framework that my tiny, scattered mind can process.
One question: if NZ is part of Polynesia, why isn’t Oz part of Melanesia? Is it because it is a continent that it doesn’t count as being part of an island chain?
Dan tdaxp added these pithy words on 26 Jun 07 at 1:13 pmA fascinating and informative post. Thank you.
PS: Good q. on New Zealand, YH. Perhaps Catholicgauze knows the answer…
Phil (Pacific Empire) added these pithy words on 26 Jun 07 at 1:28 pmYounghusband: Thanks :-) Classifying NZ along with Polynesia makes sense because our indigenous people, the Maori (c. 15 % of the population) are of Polynesian origin, while another 5-10% originate from the other Polynesian islands.
Australia’s Torres Strait islands, between Queensland and PNG, are usually considered part of Melanesia in a cultural and geographical sense. Australia’s mainland Aboriginals, while they are closely linked to other Melanesian peoples, aren’t generally grouped with them. The distinctions are fairly arbitrary and reflects colonial policy and shared history, as much as ethnic reality. For example, Palau used to be grouped with Melanesia, and Fiji is sometimes considered Polynesian. Nevertheless there are some broad similarities in each island group, and the terms are still widely use d.
Curzon: good question, which Chris has partially answered above. I have some more thoughts on the topic, but they can wait until the morning…
SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.
