Entry details

Guest
Author

Guest

Date

June 18th, 2007

Tags

, , ,

Comments

8 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Dark Side of Paradise: Conflict in Melanesia

[Today is Oceania Day! The following is the first post in the series by special guest blogger the strategist. ”“ Younghusband]

Photo: Wayne Levin/Getty imageAsk New Zealanders what springs to mind about Oceania, and the answer will involve palm-fringed islands and blue lagoons – paradise. Pacific islands are holiday destinations, places to escape winter. It’s easy to forget that there’s a dark side to Pacific life; people are surprised when an insurrection or coup occurs.

This is odd, as anyone who lived through World War Two, or was born in its shadow, will know. Names of Pacific battles – Coral Sea, Guadalcanal, Kokoda Trail, Tarawa – signified great violence. And since the 1960s Oceania has been plagued by political conflict, particularly in Melanesia – the chain of islands stretching from New Guinea to New Caledonia:

  • wars of independence in West Papua (1963 onwards), East Timor (1975-99), Vanuatu (1980), New Caledonia (1980s), Bougainville (1988-1997);
  • ethnic warfare in Solomon Islands (1998-2003) and Papua New Guinea’s highlands (ongoing);
  • military coups in Fiji (four since 1987) and Solomon Islands (2000), and mutinies in PNG, Fiji and Vanuatu.

So, why the ‘trouble in paradise’? The causes of instability are complex. They include ill-disciplined armies and paramilitary police, volatile ethnic politics, and attempts by states, often weak post-colonial constructs, to impose authority over clans.

The rugged Melanesian terrain has influenced the development of many clan-based ethnic groups, confined to small territories, each with distinct languages. Fiercely independent, these groups resist state control. Large mines are a particular source of trouble. The state appropriates land, resources and mining income, and mining destroy forests, rivers and gardens. Local people protest, and sometimes protest turns violent.

A good example of this is Bougainville’s Panguna mine. From 1972-1989 CRA mined copper and gold on the island of Bougainville, which is notionally part of PNG. Expats who worked at Panguna talk about how the coastal town of Arawa resembled a resort, of scuba diving in crystal water, of playing on the golf course.

Paradise lost. In 1989 Bougainville rebels – angered by land loss and environmental destruction – attacked the mine. Fighting between the rebels and army forced the mine to close and expats to flee. A brutish state of anarchy and civil war ensued in which 10,000 Bougainvilleans died. The conflict also destabilized PNG’s economy and government – the army mutinied in 1997 after the government hired foreign mercenaries to take down the rebels.

In 1987/88 New Zealand brokered a peace deal. By then Arawa was a ruin. The port was smashed. Roads were trails in the undergrowth. The golf links were smothered in tall grass. Mine plant machinery lay rusting. The peace has held, but Bougainvilleans are determined that Panguna, a symbol of violence, must not re-open.

Bougainville is a salutary lesson of how order can quickly turn to chaos. It also suggests that a stable Melanesian government is one that leaves communities alone without trying to ‘develop’ or control them. Such governments, with help from New Zealand and Australia, could be guardians, protecting local communities against rapacious outsiders, such as Asian timber loggers who plunder Melanesia’s rainforests, and guarding maritime frontiers against dangerous intruders – terrorists, drug smugglers and gun runners.

Comments to this entry

Curzon
June 18, 2007
12:35 pm
I had honestly never heard of the geographic region of "Melanesia":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanesia before this post -- thank you.

Is the Indonesian area of Melanesia any more stable than the rest of the region? For all we hear of Papua New Guinea, Aceh, and Java/Jakarta, I've never heard of happenings in the eastern part of Indonesia.
strategist
June 18, 2007
6:35 pm
East Timor and West Papua, which is the Indonesian controlled half of New Guinea, have been plagued by war, between the Indonesian army and, respectively, East Timorese guerillas and Papua separatists. In East Timor, the war ended in 1999, when Indonesia withdrew, although there has been some internal trouble there since. The conflict in West Papua continues.

Islands in the Nusa Tenggara, like Flores and Sumba, along with West Timor, which have largely Christian populatations, have been stable. This may partly be because they are more integrated with Indonesia (unlike East Timor, they were part of the Dutch empire rather than the Portuguese, and so 'naturally' became part of the Indonesian nation post independence), and do not have a heavy and aggressive Indonesian army and police presence.
Phil (Pacific Empire)
June 19, 2007
2:31 am
Great first post, Peter.

Curzon: West Papua is one of the bloodiest and the longest-running conflict in the region. While never particularly intense, in 44 years of fighting more than 100,000 people may have been killed. It rarely makes headlines, though, except when Westerners are affected (eg the 1996 hostage-taking) or asylum-seekers reach Australia (as happened last year, affecting Indonesian-Australian relations).

The Freeport McMoran gold mine is one of the major factors in the conflict. PMCs are involved and the Indonesian army in the region is partially funded by the mine. Other factors include loyalist militia and transmigration from Java, adding ethnic conflict to the mix. With increased logging and mining activity, the conflict is likely to escalate and perhaps spill over to the PNG highlands.
strategist
June 19, 2007
10:04 am
Thanks Phil. Reading the post and Phil's comment, and considering also the turmoil in Aceh and Ambon, you can start to understand why Australian analysts, who are always forthright these matters, in the 1990s labelled Melanesia - Indonesia as the 'Arc of Instability'.

The Australian concern is that instability in Melanesia and Indonesia will create risks for Australia along its long north and northeastern littoral, e.g., inflows of refugees, smugglers, terrorists through weak states to the north, and the need for armed intervention in conflicts to safeguard Australian citizens and interests.
Curzon
June 19, 2007
1:38 pm
Certainly Australia's proximity to an unstable, anarchaic, ungoverned place like Indonesia explains a lot, to me, as to why Australians are a lot more realist when it comes to foreign affairs.
lirelou
June 21, 2007
12:05 am
And perhaps explains why Australia is increasing its naval projection capability for stability operations by acquiring two ships capable of carrying and supporting troops.
Pacific Empire » Blog Archive » Oceania's regions: Micronesia, Melanesia and Polynesia
June 27, 2007
2:01 pm
[...] Strategist posted last week on conflict in Melanesia, a region within Oceania alongside Micronesia and Polynesia. To keep this [...]
Pacific Empire » Blog Archive » Congratulations, Coming Anarchy!
October 2, 2007
7:47 am
[...] Dark Side of Paradise: Conflict in Melanesia (Peter) [...]