Entry details

Curzon
Author

Curzon

Date

June 2nd, 2007

Tags

, ,

Comments

9 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Be careful what you write

The Economist had an article on the new age of electronic discovery, citing one attorney that it is “the single most significant change to the legal system” in the past few decades, and another corporate counsel that his company spends at least 25% more on legal fees relating to discovery than it did two years ago. On email, it has this to say:

Catty or salacious gossip, the kind that was once swapped at the water cooler, is now often committed to e-mail. This is easy to subpoena and virtually impossible to erase. There is always a back-up somewhere, so even if you delete the e-mail privately denigrating a stock you are publicly urging your clients to buy, it will still be read out in court. If your firm is sued for sexual discrimination, expect the plaintiff to demand all the lewd e-mails your male executives have ever swapped with each other.

Welcome to the age of email. A message sent over the internet is not some private note sent to the recipient only. More and more, email can make or break lawsuits, personal reputations, and even criminal cases. Private, home computers are not off-limits either, which could be subject to disclosure in the event of a lawsuit. Just consider a few examples from recent weeks and months:

Conclusion: be careful what you write. Just imagine that every email you draft could be read by the world.

Comments to this entry

alec
June 2, 2007
7:57 pm
It looks like that letter was a hoax, by the way. The Occidentalism has an update on the situation.
a517dogg
June 2, 2007
8:39 pm
Unless, of course, you work in the White House, in which case millions of emails can just mysteriously disappear.
Alfred Russel Wallace
June 2, 2007
10:18 pm
A useful reminder is to consider what you would do if what you wrote appeared in the local newspaper... could you still hold your head up in public?
Curzon
June 2, 2007
11:19 pm
Alec, the email was not a hoax and no blogs (Marmot, Occidentalism) have stated as such. Marmot did let the person in question "get his side of the story out,":http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/05/31/reponse-from-aussie-english-teacher/ tho.

But sexual harassment stories show and email stories really show up in the news everyday, "such as this story from yesterday.":http://www.firefightingnews.com/article-US.cfm?articleID=31894
Chief Wiggam
June 2, 2007
11:59 pm
Another downside of this is that government officials and others may be reluctant to use email, or takes notes in meetings, or commit discussions to minutes or tape or video recording in order to avoid subpoenas for these communications.

The out party has always gone after the in party with subpoenas, congressional hearings and the like. This has probably made frank and open dicusssions more problematic.

Future historians may have more difficulty in studying and explaining what is happening today due to abbreviated documentation.
Curzon
June 3, 2007
12:44 am
This has probably made frank and open dicusssions more problematic.


Yet another reason to blog anonymously?

Future historians may have more difficulty in studying and explaining what is happening today due to abbreviated documentation.


In this regard, the biggest problem is that nothing is printed out and saved, and paper files that used to be kept in libraries are not saved on harddrives and electronic media, which allows for far greater material, but makes it easy to be lost, misplaced, and destroyed over time.

I forget the exact story... this may have been in the Atlantic... one military officer writing a report on the First Gulf War was terrified to find that all the documentation of one division of the Defense Department was kept on one old Apple Macintosh that was about to be discarded... had he not printed out thousands of pages of files, they all would have been lost forever.
Hayduke
June 3, 2007
3:48 am
I write nothing that is not true. Why should I be careful of the truth?
a517dogg
June 3, 2007
3:49 am
Curzon - there is no such thing as blogging anonymously.
Joe
June 3, 2007
6:13 am
There is always a back-up somewhere, so even if you delete the e-mail privately denigrating a stock you are publicly urging your clients to buy, it will still be read out in court.
Not to mention that it's illegal to destroy evidence which can be used against you, so if anyone could show that the e-mail existed, you would be facing, at best, a presumption that the contents were what your opponent says they were (which could be much worse than the truth).

Bottom line: If there's any doubt, avoid generating any records in the first place. Talk in person or over a land line phone. (One doesn't need a wiretap order to listen in on a cell phone conversation, from what I understand...)