Read the debate from Yale. Via John Robb.
- BROWSE / IN TIMELINE
- « Death and language
- » Learning to travel light
COMMENTS / 23 COMMENTS
elambend added these pithy words on 23 Feb 07 at 3:12 pmAs much respect as I have for Wei Jingsheng, I don’t think he really has a finger on the pulse of today’s China. Also, for something out of Yale, I can’t believe they couldn’t get Jonathan Spence to contribute anything.
This is said before reading everything entirely, though.
Kurt9 added these pithy words on 23 Feb 07 at 7:39 pmI will be spending more time in China in the next few years. I should get a feel for if their will be a civil war or not after I have been there for a few months.
If they have a civil war, it will most likely result in a break up of the country, which might actually be good. The Chinese economy would probably grow even faster with it separated into competing entities rather than under a single, monopoly authoritarian entity. Think of centralized government as a monopoly. Competition is always better than monopoly at driving technological innovation and economic growth.
Why is everyone here and in Europe so in love with large scale social institutions? All large social institutions are bureaucracies and eveyone knows that bureaucracy is incapable of productive endevours.
There are even idiots on the web who think that a world government would be a good thing. I think the 1000 state sovereignty model is a goog and likely future for the world.
elambend added these pithy words on 23 Feb 07 at 9:33 pmI disagree. The reason everyone is trying for larger scale is that they are attempting to emulate the largest most successful common market ever, i.e. the United States; not that execution in the emulation is always done well. (and even in the U.S. a business’s largest competitor is some level of sovreign institutions, be it federal or municipal).
A.E. added these pithy words on 23 Feb 07 at 10:08 pmWhat I fear about with China is that in the event of a revolution the Communist Party will be replaced by a intensely nationalistic regime that will trigger all sorts of tensions (and maybe even violence) with China’s neighbors. I’m not saying that the current regime is already doing that to some degree, but the popular sentiment right now is hyper-nationalist.
Brian added these pithy words on 23 Feb 07 at 10:15 pmI thought I thought there was already a chinese civil war on…
Younghusband added these pithy words on 23 Feb 07 at 11:59 pmI would just like to point to this post by AE.
Jing added these pithy words on 24 Feb 07 at 12:29 amA civil war is unlikely at present because the Communist Party has a monopoly on military force. A regional civil war is unlikely, as some have pointed out out, China is more nationalist today than at any time in the past 2 decades. What this means is greater national political consciousness and not regional devolution of moral authority. Hence you aren’t going to see a Hebei vs Fujian schism i.e. the American civil war.
Regarding Xinjiang, I believe China should follow Singapore’s model in dissipating ethnic tensions, that is by breaking up ethnic ghettos. While Singapore’s case was in a single city, China’s is on a much larger scale. the CCP should begin to do so by dismantling all ethnic autonomous regions in Xinjiang and deporting the inhabitants elsewhere. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. All Uighur neighborhoods should then be split up into smaller areas dispersed among Chinese urban centers.
ElamBend added these pithy words on 24 Feb 07 at 12:54 amOr, you could follow current CCP policy and flood the area with Han to dilute the local homogeny.
ElamBend added these pithy words on 24 Feb 07 at 12:56 amI should have checked AE’s post first. Apparently that doesn’t work.
A.E. added these pithy words on 24 Feb 07 at 2:52 amThanks for the link, Younghusband.
As for the Singapore model, I think it would be too much bad PR for China, especially considering it wants to add legitimacy to its growing power. If you can’t even hide a good old summary execution at the Tibetan border from Youtube, how can you hide such a huge land migration like that?
Michael added these pithy words on 25 Feb 07 at 8:11 pmJing, put yourself in the shoes of a Uighur subjected to the treatment you just recommended. Maybe you weren’t sympathetic to the terrorists before, but how would you feel after being forcibly torn from your home and sent far away, your family and friends scattered to the four winds? I’d be feeling a lot more sympathetic, myself.
Instead of a marginalized group in one corner of the country, the Uighurs would become a marginalized group scattered throughout the country.
Yago added these pithy words on 25 Feb 07 at 8:49 pmSome Chinese friends of mine from Peking University told if China became democratic and held free elections, the very next day Japan, Korea and Taiwan would disappear from the map.
I asked them why, and they said that in today’s China there’s an infallible way to win an election: just shout “Fuck Japan!” 干日本.
So as crazy as it may seem from the outside, the CCP is regarded as a prudent and stabilizing force inside the country, and this by young, educated people.
A.E. added these pithy words on 25 Feb 07 at 9:05 pmYago’s made a good point. As bad as the CCP is, Chinese nationalists will be much worse.
Jing added these pithy words on 28 Feb 07 at 2:06 amWell a marginalized group scattered in isolated communities would be extremely vulnerable to assimilation or irrelevance. A marginalized group concentrated into “ghettos” only leads to unrest and agitation. It is much better that they be miserable rather than me and mine. Because the first thing that happens in the advent of an independent Xinjiang is a purge of ethnic Chinese.
Regarding Chinese politics sans the Communist Party, I think everyone is going to be in for bit of a surprise when it happens and it won’t be like anything anyone is expecting.
Mutantfrog added these pithy words on 28 Feb 07 at 7:04 amJing, I’m not sure there would be as much of a purge of ethnic Chinese in Xinjiang as you expect. Sure, the Uyghur resent the Chinese pretty heavily and they would probably deport all the migrant workers and newcomers who have been settled there in recent years as part of the western frontiers development strategy, but all of the Turkic Central Asian countries are used to having significant ethnic minorities of neighboring countries and I expect Uyhgurstan would be the same. I think Chinese who were established long term in Xinjiang would have a much better chance of being allowed to stay than the current wave of immigrants. For example, look at Kazakhstan, which was colonized by Russia for well over a century, and today has something like a 30% ethnic Russian population.
tomojiro added these pithy words on 28 Feb 07 at 8:39 amI understand that the communist party is a kind of stabilizer between rational politics and ultra nationalistic popular feelings, but if they want to be respected in the international community, they have to stop things like the following.
http://www.l.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~toyoshi/tohtienglish.html
Honestly said I don’t know how they can manage it but they must stop opressing minority groups brutaly, and they must find a way to co-live with them in peacefull manner.
sunbin added these pithy words on 28 Feb 07 at 2:37 pmwhat you guys are discussing here are hypothetical.
in reality, in most of the counties in xinjiang, uighurs are not majority. there are kazakh, uzbeks, mongols, etc. i.e. if there is a democratic election in XJ, uighur would not win.
in fact, CCP has been preparing the demographic zoning for a democratic election, since the early 1950s. county boundaries have been redrawn and redrawn and people have been moved.
1) CCP anticipate and is preparing for a USSR like meltdown, and took counter-measure
or
2) CCP knows that democracy is unavoidabletherefore, i do not think anything like USSR will happen to china, but that is not a result of what CCP did, but that China’s demographic and culture is fundamentally different from USSR, or even from Russia Federation
Aceface added these pithy words on 28 Feb 07 at 3:02 pmThen again Kazakhs,Kyrghis,Uzbeks and Mongols don’t like Han Chinese as much as Uyghurs.They all share the feeling that natural resources of Xinjiang is taken by Beijing without giving much to the local economy.Anti Han-Beijing trans ethnic regionalism based on resource nationalism might pops out if CCP loose grip in the region.And since many Han chinese are hired in the government sector which cannot be sustained if CCP falls apart,there could also be a massive change in the demography.
Michael added these pithy words on 28 Feb 07 at 5:55 pmIn the long term, you’re right Jing. But in the short term, scattering them throughout the country against their will would be a good to to MAKE everybody miserable.
Personally, I agree with Tomojiro on this one. If the CCP wants to settle the Uighur problem, it needs to treat them better and give them a stake in China’s future.
Jing added these pithy words on 01 Mar 07 at 12:07 amThe Uighurs can only be given a stake if they want one, which is unfortunately not true for some of them. Given the ample linguistic opportunities to learn Mandarin Chinese, they are many who pride themselves on remaining ignorant of the lingua franca of the region.
In the absence of strict military control by the PLA or the Construction Corp forming ad-hoc death squads, the Uighurs will attempt to drive the Chinese out with varying degrees of persecution. It is a simple matter, in any area where there is a delicate balance between muslims and non-muslims, the muslims will eventually attempt to drive the others out. The only way to avoid this is to either preempt or maintain overwhelming force.
tomojiro added these pithy words on 01 Mar 07 at 12:52 amJing
If all the chinese and the chinese government maintain the same logic as yours, then uprisings in Uighur and Tibet will never cease until the Chinese conduct a kind of genosite against them.
The problem in contemporary china is that the CCP has inherited the territory of a multi-ethnic and muti-cultural empire, and that they are trying to turn this multi-cultural and multi-ethnical space into a monolithic nation state based on the language of the majority.
I don’t think what you are proposing is the best way to integrate china. Tibet and Uighur , they have still vivid memory when they had their own government. The CCP must find a way to respect these facts and their historical memories.
Aceface added these pithy words on 01 Mar 07 at 1:49 amJing:
Were you not the one who had alternative view on Zhang Yimou’s “Hero” not a fascist film and saying Chinese political view are much more diversed than official CCP line?
All this sounds pretty much like Uncle Joe’s central asian policy or his treatment of Chechens and Crimean Tartars during WW2.
Now that is a culture ” fundamentally different from USSR, or even from Russia Federation”.Preaching Stalinism in 21st century on internet….
