Rumours regarding a possible purchase of 80 German Leopard tanks (walkaround here) by the Canadian Forces have been swirling around once again. Globe and Mail reporter David Ebner casts doubt on the sensibleness of the purchase by dredging up statements by Chief of the Defence Staff General Rick Hillier in 2003. The article states that Gen. Hillier
... called the Leopards “very capable” in a 2003 speech, but he declared that the heavy equipment was “less relevant” for recent conflicts Canada had encountered and was “useless to our soldiers in Kabul.” ... “[The Leopard] cannot manoeuvre and I give you the streets of Kabul, those little tiny narrow alleyways, as an example of that.”
The CDS was an armour officer back in the day, and knows his way around a tank. Last year Canada sent 15 Leopards to Afghanistan. So what is going on here? Are the tanks really just an anachronistic tool, useless in a 4GW/COIN world? Are our military leaders confused and just making stuff up as they go along? Or is this the work of some shadowy tank lobby, waiting in the wings for a glorious return to the Cold War?
I’m sorry but it is none of the above. This simply is another example of the ever-fluctuating nature of war. Historically, certain capabilities from years past have cycled into reuse. We even see this in the generational model of warfare, with the use of traditional methods to defeat cutting-edge technology. Heck, many were surprised that animal husbandry was an important skill for the modern SOF operator.
The reason we sent those tanks over is because they are really good at patrolling open areas, namely Highway 1 in southern Afghanistan. Otherwise known as “Ambush Alley,” H1 has been the final resting ground for many Canadian soldiers. H1 leads right into the dreaded Panjwaii district. Canadian and Afghan forces opened the highway after Op Medusa and want to keep it open to allow goods to flow in and out of the area. It is an important COIN initiative in a part of the country with a looming enemy presence. The Leopards (which can withstand an IED or two) were sent to protect the highway, patrolling for saboteurs.
Thus, in 2003 when the soldiers were fighting in the confined areas of wall-alleys and grape plantations, tanks were pretty useless and the CF opted for the G-Wagon. Now the situation has changed, and so have the tools. It is good to see that the CF leadership are not suffering from a cookie-cutter mentality. It is too bad to see that the press is.
- BROWSE / IN TIMELINE
- « Rome’s network society
- » Thieving in Batumi
COMMENTS / 4 COMMENTS
lirelou added these pithy words on 13 Feb 07 at 7:53 amForces must be tailored to the mission, and equipped and armed accordingly. A modern combat force needs a state of the art tank, even if current deployments do not look promising. Task Force Ranger had no need of tanks, prior to a couple of aircraft getting shot out of the skies. Much better to have your own (reasonably) in pocket than go begging to an adjacent U.N. force.
jon added these pithy words on 13 Feb 07 at 3:52 pmI think what you will be seeing from the advanced state militaries is the combined arms concept being followed further and further down the command level. Instead of having heavy divisions of tanks and armored infantry, you will see a brigade with a tank company, a light infantry comp, arty comp, etc. I think for individual missions you will see much more of a tank or two going out with a couple of APC’s, while hooking up with LRRP’s or SF to complete a mission. There will still be the heavy divisions for when we need to take down a second rate state power, but they will find themselves either underutilized, or deploying with other types of units.
a517dogg added these pithy words on 13 Feb 07 at 7:49 pmJon – I think in Iraq the US Marines are experimenting with this all the way down to the squad level, with some squad commanders having a direct line to air support and artillery.
Also let’s not forget the value of tanks and all the Cold War goodies for deterrence. It’s a way of telling North Korea & co. “we can break you” (even if we wouldn’t know what to do with the pieces).
lirelou added these pithy words on 13 Feb 07 at 11:40 pmThe 1960s cavalry troop was a miniature combined arms team, with an infantry squad (mounted in an M-113), A 4.2 mortar (also M-113 mounted), and scout sections riding in M-113s or M-114s (depending).
