<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Munich Security&#160;Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:11:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IJ</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-253857</link>
		<dc:creator>IJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2478#comment-253857</guid>
		<description>Maybe the UK won&#039;t have to replace Trident.  This would save taxpayers upwards of Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£20bn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the UK won&#8217;t have to replace Trident.  This would save taxpayers upwards of &Atilde;ƒ&acirc;€š&Atilde;‚&Acirc;&pound;20bn.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJ</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-253821</link>
		<dc:creator>IJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2478#comment-253821</guid>
		<description>NATO are talking to the Russians about joint arrangements for &quot;tactical missile defence for armies in the field.&quot;  The &quot;FT&quot;:http://www.ft.com/cms/s/289ed728-bd26-11db-b5bd-0000779e2340.html suggests that Moscow want to go even further and be included in a European-wide anti-missile system. 
 
However NATO&#039;s attitude to Russia may not be shared by leading member US.
  
&quot;The Pentagon is preparing to start negotiations with Poland and the Czech Republic about hosting missile interceptors and radars. . .Russia threatened on Thursday to pull out of a landmark nuclear arms control treaty unless the US backed away from plans to install its missile defence shield in Eastern Europe.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">NATO </span>are talking to the Russians about joint arrangements for &#8220;tactical missile defence for armies in the field.&#8221;  The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/289ed728-bd26-11db-b5bd-0000779e2340.html">FT</a> suggests that Moscow want to go even further and be included in a European-wide anti-missile system. <br />
 <br />
However <span class="caps">NATO&#8217;</span>s attitude to Russia may not be shared by leading member <span class="caps">US.</span><br />
  <br />
&#8220;The Pentagon is preparing to start negotiations with Poland and the Czech Republic about hosting missile interceptors and radars. . .Russia threatened on Thursday to pull out of a landmark nuclear arms control treaty unless the US backed away from plans to install its missile defence shield in Eastern Europe.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-252611</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2478#comment-252611</guid>
		<description>Ok...on my pocket pc she looks like pinocchio....lmao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok&#8230;on my pocket pc she looks like pinocchio&#8230;.lmao</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJ</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-252130</link>
		<dc:creator>IJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2478#comment-252130</guid>
		<description>The Russian President surely can&#039;t be upset with NATO. 

The alliance&#039;s S-G told the Munich conference that NATO aims to work better with the United Nations, and develop better ties with Russia.  Interestingly De Hoop Scheffer called for all NATO nations to spend at least 2 percent of their national income on defence.  This would especially hurt old members Luxembourg (estimated 0.6% of GDP in 2006), Belgium (1.1%), Canada (1.2%), Spain (1.2%) and Germany (1.3%).  Low spending Germany is currently president of the EU and the G8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Russian President surely can&#8217;t be upset with <span class="caps">NATO. </span></p>

<p>The alliance&#8217;s S-G told the Munich conference that <span class="caps">NATO </span>aims to work better with the United Nations, and develop better ties with Russia.  Interestingly De Hoop Scheffer called for all <span class="caps">NATO </span>nations to spend at least 2 percent of their national income on defence.  This would especially hurt old members Luxembourg (estimated 0.6% of <span class="caps">GDP </span>in 2006), Belgium (1.1%), Canada (1.2%), Spain (1.2%) and Germany (1.3%).  Low spending Germany is currently president of the EU and the <span class="caps">G8.</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-251946</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2478#comment-251946</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the hand of a guy in the background, not her nose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the hand of a guy in the background, not her nose.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-250086</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2478#comment-250086</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or is her nose &quot;well endowed&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or is her nose &#8220;well endowed&#8221;?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: von Kaufman-Turkestanky</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-249522</link>
		<dc:creator>von Kaufman-Turkestanky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2478#comment-249522</guid>
		<description>Nice hemet!
Chirol, your challenge: at the next big event, get your name on the VIP list and give us the skinny on what goes on!
In the meantime, good luck with the planning for the Caucasus trip, have a safe one, and good luck with the even more important nuptials. All the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice hemet!<br />
Chirol, your challenge: at the next big event, get your name on the <span class="caps">VIP </span>list and give us the skinny on what goes on!<br />
In the meantime, good luck with the planning for the Caucasus trip, have a safe one, and good luck with the even more important nuptials. All the best.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giustino</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-249444</link>
		<dc:creator>Giustino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2478#comment-249444</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about that, Putin is said to pack quite the Judo chop ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about that, Putin is said to pack quite the Judo chop ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexington Green</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-249072</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexington Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2478#comment-249072</guid>
		<description>The female cop looks like she could the ass of the guy with the Ph.D.

I actually wish she would.  

Maybe she could slap Putin around while she is at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The female cop looks like she could the ass of the guy with the Ph.D.</p>

<p>I actually wish she would.  </p>

<p>Maybe she could slap Putin around while she is at it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giustino</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2007/02/11/munich-security-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-248820</link>
		<dc:creator>Giustino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2478#comment-248820</guid>
		<description>Of all Putin&#039;s criticisms, I think the thing that set him off most was the plan to deploy the anti-ballistic missiles in the Czech Republic and Poland, ostensibly to protect Prague from an attack by Tehran. Anyone could tell you that that isn&#039;t in Russia&#039;s &quot;strategic interests&quot; whatever those may be.

Russia is so hard to figure out though. They whined and jumped up and down when the Estonians joined NATO and then ... nothing happened. Estonians are now serving in Afghanistan and Iraq. Big deal. Plus, they posture like they&#039;re all cool with Baltic NATO membership now, but five years ago they were adamantly opposed. So will further NATO enlargement produce the same result?

How does one differentiate between your regular Russian temper tantrum and taking them seriously?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all Putin&#8217;s criticisms, I think the thing that set him off most was the plan to deploy the anti-ballistic missiles in the Czech Republic and Poland, ostensibly to protect Prague from an attack by Tehran. Anyone could tell you that that isn&#8217;t in Russia&#8217;s &#8220;strategic interests&#8221; whatever those may be.</p>

<p>Russia is so hard to figure out though. They whined and jumped up and down when the Estonians joined <span class="caps">NATO </span>and then &#8230; nothing happened. Estonians are now serving in Afghanistan and Iraq. Big deal. Plus, they posture like they&#8217;re all cool with Baltic <span class="caps">NATO </span>membership now, but five years ago they were adamantly opposed. So will further <span class="caps">NATO </span>enlargement produce the same result?</p>

<p>How does one differentiate between your regular Russian temper tantrum and taking them seriously?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
