<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Curzon right two years&#160;early</title>
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mutantfrog Travelogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hastert tipped as next Tokyo ambassador</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-156502</link>
		<dc:creator>Mutantfrog Travelogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hastert tipped as next Tokyo ambassador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 03:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-156502</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: Looks like Da Curzon Code was right. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <span class="caps">UPDATE</span>: Looks like Da Curzon Code was right. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-156501</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 03:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-156501</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchive/2006/03/i_called_it.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;He called it!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchive/2006/03/i_called_it.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/onegoodmove.org');">He called it!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lirelou</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-156485</link>
		<dc:creator>lirelou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 03:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-156485</guid>
		<description>Until I served with the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City, I always presumed that professional diplomats far outshone their political appointee counterparts. Mexico is traditionally reserved for business heavy hitters, who generally owe their nominations to  donations. Surprisingly, an article in the local Mexican press while I was there evaluated the ambassadors of the past 20 years, and ranked the businessmen high. The business of the U.S., they quoted some forgotten President (Warren Harding?) was business, and it was precisely U.S. business that Mexico was interested in. The only ambassador they ranked below par was Ronald Reagan's, who was, I believe, an actor of partial Mexican-American descent. Mexico City was, at that time, the largest U.S. diplomatic mission abroad, and the Ambassador was backed up by a superbly talented Charge d'Affaires. The Mexican peso had just dropped through the floor, but Mexican sales to the U.S. market (of which beer and tequila were important segments) helped the peso to recover.  Connections in Washington are important, but so are connections to (or in the alternative, a deep understanding o) fthose sectors of U.S. commerce and industry which most effect the host nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until I served with the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City, I always presumed that professional diplomats far outshone their political appointee counterparts. Mexico is traditionally reserved for business heavy hitters, who generally owe their nominations to  donations. Surprisingly, an article in the local Mexican press while I was there evaluated the ambassadors of the past 20 years, and ranked the businessmen high. The business of the U.S., they quoted some forgotten President (Warren Harding?) was business, and it was precisely U.S. business that Mexico was interested in. The only ambassador they ranked below par was Ronald Reagan&#8217;s, who was, I believe, an actor of partial Mexican-American descent. Mexico City was, at that time, the largest U.S. diplomatic mission abroad, and the Ambassador was backed up by a superbly talented Charge d&#8217;Affaires. The Mexican peso had just dropped through the floor, but Mexican sales to the U.S. market (of which beer and tequila were important segments) helped the peso to recover.  Connections in Washington are important, but so are connections to (or in the alternative, a deep understanding o) fthose sectors of U.S. commerce and industry which most effect the host nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-155533</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-155533</guid>
		<description>I think your observation is a good one, but it's important to remember that Washington connections are important in a purely symbolic sense, since the US ambassador in Tokyo shares day-to-day management of US-Japan relations with the commander of US Forces, Japan at Yokota, the commander of the Seventh Fleet at Yokosuka, and PACOM in Honolulu. Strategic responsibility, meanwhile, rests of late, in the Pentagon and the White House. 

So the US ambassador needs to conduct the obligatory "nemawashi" that makes every other US-Japan policymaker's job easier and then get out of the way. A well-connected ambassador, particularly one with political gravitas AND a close relationship with the president (the problem with Schieffer being that he had the latter and not the former) is useful for reassuring the Japanese that the relationship is important -- and that's pretty much it. 

Of the list you provided the only major exception to this mode was Mondale, who was, as Funabashi Yoichi wrote in "Alliance Adrift", "secretary of state for Asia-Pacific affairs"; that was only because Warren Christopher was clueless about Asia, and in any event, Mondale was secondary in the process of alliance revision to Nye and other officials at the Pentagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your observation is a good one, but it&#8217;s important to remember that Washington connections are important in a purely symbolic sense, since the US ambassador in Tokyo shares day-to-day management of US-Japan relations with the commander of <span class="caps">US </span>Forces, Japan at Yokota, the commander of the Seventh Fleet at Yokosuka, and <span class="caps">PACOM</span> in Honolulu. Strategic responsibility, meanwhile, rests of late, in the Pentagon and the White House.</p>
<p>So the US ambassador needs to conduct the obligatory &#8220;nemawashi&#8221; that makes every other US-Japan policymaker&#8217;s job easier and then get out of the way. A well-connected ambassador, particularly one with political gravitas <span class="caps">AND</span> a close relationship with the president (the problem with Schieffer being that he had the latter and not the former) is useful for reassuring the Japanese that the relationship is important&#8212;and that&#8217;s pretty much it.</p>
<p>Of the list you provided the only major exception to this mode was Mondale, who was, as Funabashi Yoichi wrote in &#8220;Alliance Adrift&#8221;, &#8220;secretary of state for Asia-Pacific affairs&#8221;; that was only because Warren Christopher was clueless about Asia, and in any event, Mondale was secondary in the process of alliance revision to Nye and other officials at the Pentagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeS</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-154859</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-154859</guid>
		<description>Curzon, you are an oracle my friend.  What else can I say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curzon, you are an oracle my friend.  What else can I say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carpetblogger</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-154845</link>
		<dc:creator>carpetblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-154845</guid>
		<description>Or, be one step removed from a scandal that contributed to your party's mid-term thumpin'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, be one step removed from a scandal that contributed to your party&#8217;s mid-term thumpin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curzon</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-154746</link>
		<dc:creator>Curzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-154746</guid>
		<description>No -- pray tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8212;pray tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mutantfrog</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-154738</link>
		<dc:creator>Mutantfrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/11/15/curzon-right-two-years-early/#comment-154738</guid>
		<description>You mean you haven't heard about Saru's probably upcoming job?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean you haven&#8217;t heard about Saru&#8217;s probably upcoming job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
