The President of Senegal has an interesting take on the high price of oil. He notes that while American and European consumers complain about high prices, they are at least in a position to afford it. Small African nations for example, have been hit much harder and his explains the devastating effects expensive oil is having.
In sub-Saharan Africa, in particular, the oil crisis is not a vexing “cost crunch”; it is an unfolding catastrophe that could set back efforts to reduce poverty and promote economic development for years.In the United States, working men and women fretted when gas prices topped $3 a gallon this year. Here in the capital of Senegal, gasoline costs $5.62 a gallon. Unlike the United States, we are not a rich nation. Imagine having to pay such an exorbitant price to fill up your tank—but in a country where per capita income is $849 a year. Senegal’s electrical utility has been forced to turn off the lights throughout the nation for long periods every day, a crippling problem that could be eased if energy cost less.
The math is not hard to do. Everywhere in West Africa, governments are being forced to reallocate lifeline budget subsidies to counterbalance unprecedented oil and electricity prices. Senegal’s direct oil subsidies to domestic consumers have increased fivefold since 2002. Niger’s fuel costs have quadrupled. Even in Africa’s oil-producing nations, windfall profits from oil have failed to reduce poverty. Per capita income in Nigeria is still $1,400 a year.
If the price of crude oil reaches $100 a barrel within the next year—as some analysts predict—a pan-African disaster will be upon us. Richer, oil-producing countries in Africa risk being inundated with mass migrations of people seeking survival.
By draining government treasuries, the soaring price of oil in West African nations has made it all but impossible to proceed with antipoverty efforts, and it is hindering work to increase access to public health services and to reduce the spread of AIDS. It is true that man does not live by bread alone. But being freed from the daily necessities of survival is a prerequisite to educating the workforce and building an economy.
The oil shock wave is undermining American aims on the continent, too. As oil prices go into orbit, America’s efforts to promote liberal democratic economies and combat terrorism in Africa are sabotaged. I write this as the head of state of a tolerant, pro-Western—and predominantly Muslim—nation.
Indeed, the death of Nigeria may not be civil war or terrorism as so many predict. It may success, or rather hanging in there. We all know what happend to the Ivory Coast. In Africa, success is fatal.
Many thanks to Eddie for the head’s up.
- BROWSE / IN TIMELINE
- « Shutting down Milblogs
- » Lords of Logistics
COMMENTS / 7 COMMENTS
Lex added these pithy words on 31 Oct 06 at 2:38 amSame thing happened during the ‘73 oil embargo. No one talks about it. We had cars lined up at the gas pump. Poor people in Africa DIED —in large numbers.
Bottom line, sub-Saharan Africa is a taker not a maker of history. Other people decide and act, for reasons unrelated to them, they have no say in the decisions or the actions, yet they suffer the consequences.
Very sad.
Curzon added these pithy words on 31 Oct 06 at 4:25 amThat’s a hard-hitting perspective. And we should appreciate that Senegal is institutionally better prepared to handle the crisis than any other nation in the region.
Imagine how this is going to be in the future—the population of West Africa is expected to _double_ in the next 32 years. This is what Kaplan had in mind when he wrote Coming Anarchy…
Consul-At-Arms added these pithy words on 31 Oct 06 at 3:23 pmWhy is gasoline over $5 per gallon in Senegal? Taxes?
Gollios added these pithy words on 31 Oct 06 at 3:37 pmI would guess the lack of delivery & distribution infrastructure, possibly refining as well. Sounds like a question for the new CIA factbook…
Colin added these pithy words on 31 Oct 06 at 6:07 pmI am simply not as moved as perhaps I should be. Wade has been hawking his “formula” in ads on the front page of the Financial Times for a couple months now (not complicated to figure out—basically the rest of the world should ensure Africans only have to pay $29/bbl). What really irks me is his repetitive plea that
the soaring price of oil in West African nations has made it all but impossible to proceed with antipoverty efforts
Because those “antipoverty” efforts were going so great back when oil was around $20/bbl? And cheap oil will suddenly make all the necessary economic reforms that have been neglected for decades suddenly kick into high gear?
It’s yet another African demand for a handout. Only this time the finger-pointing is ostensively at gas prices instead of “colonialism”, “neo-colonialism” or “multinational corporations” (although somehow all three of those are somewhat blamed once again).
Chirol added these pithy words on 31 Oct 06 at 8:18 pmColin: I agree that nobody should guarantee them cheap oil anymore than someone should do the same for us. The article, I believe, was rather about the impact of prices and how countries without the necessary infrastructure, trade and transport are hit even harder. And handouts aside, nobody can argue that high oil prices aren’t far more harmful to Africa than to the West.
Omar added these pithy words on 01 Nov 06 at 4:47 amMy main issue with Wade is that he has not been taking a proactive role in solving his country’s energy issues. Countries like India have been developing biofuel alternatives from tree crops like Jatropha which is well suited for the climate in Senegal. Also, the state owned electric utility has had laws passed banning large solar panels in a pathetic attempt to hold on to a monopoly. Funding a private solar industry in Dakar would be a better solution to merely subsidizing oil to power the oil burning generators in the country. Dakar has a huge population of wealthy Europeans, Chinese, and Lebanese that could sustain a private solar industry.
