Entry details

Curzon
Author

Curzon

Date

October 30th, 2006

Tags

Comments

5 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Shutting down Milblogs

Under Fire, Soldiers Kill Blogs

Some of the web’s more popular “milblogs”—blogs maintained by present or former active duty military personnel—are going quiet following a renewed push by U.S. military officials to scan sites for security risks.

Ten members of a Virginia National Guard unit have been tasked with reviewing both official and unofficial Army websites for potential operational security, or OPSEC, violations. Under the direction of the Army’s Web Risk Assessment Cell (AWRAC), the reviewers look for text, photos or videos that may give away sensitive information. “Loose lips sink ships. That’s been around since World War I, and hasn’t changed in years,” said Lt. Col. Stephen Warnock.

Milblogs offer one of the last direct witnesses to the Iraq war from the point of view of front line soldiers—a sharp reversal from three years ago, when the U.S.-led invasion was among the most closely-watched military attacks in history. According to Editor and Publisher, the number of reporters embedded in military units has dropped from 770 at the height of the conflict to just nine today.

Eddie Beaver weighs in via email:

Hostility towards milblogging from senior leadership is not surprising, given the difficulty most of the senior cadre has with understanding, let alone, mastering information warfare and their utter failure to effectively shape the narrative of the war by the global, regional and local media with Iraq. They just don’t “get it”, as one can see from their recent efforts to restrict media embeds, which is so shockingly moronic that even staunchly pro-military embeds like Michael Yon have labeled it censorship and gone public with their criticism.

The price the military will pay for this mindless severe restriction of information will be high, denying the public a needed outlet of quality information about war efforts and creating a disturbing veil of secrecy that should not exist about what’s happening in Iraq (as well as Afghanistan and other current and future battlefields) with and to our military forces there.

People will begin asking, “what are they hiding?” and at a time when forces within the Iraqi government we’re aligned with are fielding death squad militas that are committing ethnic cleansing, it could create a perfect storm of misunderstanding, bloody secrets and inflammatory half-truths that worsens the lack of trust people within America and the world increasingly have in the US government and military.

Comments to this entry

GI Korea
October 31, 2006
3:10 am
The focus on censuring milblogs is just so senseless when compared to the New York Times and other media outlets regularly printing national security secrets on their front pages, yet no one does anything to them. Plus the leaks that are providing these national security secrets to the media are probably the same ones working in the Pentagon trying to crack down on milblogs. Instead of putting so much focus on milblogs how about this blogging gestapo focus on stopping the leakers from the Pentagon and other government branches which are the real threat to our national security.
Shloky
October 31, 2006
7:28 am
I doubt there is a conspiracy of Pentagon worker bees feeding the NYT super secrets with one hand and deleting milblogs with the other.

Nor do I believe that those leaks have even remotely adversely affected national security.

Don't lose the forest for the trees.
sembawang squid
October 31, 2006
1:45 pm
GI - I heard the following comment once, and I think it addresses your concerns: "A government is the only container that leaks from the top." Hooah! - squid
subadei
October 31, 2006
11:47 pm
This may sound like an ignorant question, but I'm going to ask it:

At what point are military directives or parameters outweighed by constitutional authority in regards to those that serve? For instance, could the military simply evoke an effective informational black out regarding the milblogs in the same fashion that they ban tattoos visible while in uniform or facial hair?
CaptBBQ
November 1, 2006
5:52 am
bq. I doubt there is a conspiracy of Pentagon worker bees feeding the NYT super secrets with one hand and deleting milblogs with the other.

There isn't, they are two seperate entities, and one is a case that effects the other.

*Pentagon worker bee releases information to the media
*Higher ranking individual complains about leaking information, instructs lacky to "plug those leaks"
*Lacky looks for leaks, finds milblogs

GI Korea is right that this is senseless, I agree that most milblogs (except for some on myspace) help the image of the military, but thats an argument, a reasoned debate even, and that not what command structure is set up to accomodate.

I can't even begin to tell you how many times I tied to bring a remotely complex issue to the chain of command in the Army, and gotten an overly simplistic response that deals with half the issue and untlimately resolved nothing. Its not a conspiracy, its just that, with a war and all, guys in command have too much on their plate to warrant and in depth overview of milblogs, their effect and how they relate to press leaks.

On the issue of shutting down blogs by "former active duty military personnel", well, I'm out, and living free in a foreign country, and I depend on nothing from them. I'm became a civilian again solely for the freedom of speech. I'll shut mine down when I feel like it thank you very much. If they are trying to cut liabilities, pressuring ex-active duty folks is the wrong move. But it wouldn't be the first time somebody shot themselves in the foot.