<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gamaliel and&#160;&#8220;Gamalielese&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cominganarchy.com/2006/10/18/gamaliel-and-gamalielese/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/10/18/gamaliel-and-gamalielese/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lexington Green</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/10/18/gamaliel-and-gamalielese/comment-page-1/#comment-142405</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexington Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 04:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2177#comment-142405</guid>
		<description>Curzon, the wit is the thing.  He IS funny, and that is why, as you say, we still remember him.  

But we need to look at the presidencies of the 20s a little more carefully.  Mencken's clever barbs have framed our understanding of those times for too long.  &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Times-Revised-Perennial-Classics/dp/0060935502" rel="nofollow"&gt;Paul Johnson&lt;/a&gt; (and &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/History-American-People-Paul-Johnson/dp/0060930349/sr=1-2/qid=1161230394/ref=sr_1_2/104-1550981-7050339?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) may overpraise Harding, Coolidge and Hoover, but it is good to see a countervailing assessment of these GOP presidents, if only for balance.  

BTW, the discussion of Gamaliel in this post is excellent, and I had never seen all these elements tied together.  The passage where Gamaliel talks the elders out of killing Peter, in Acts, is one of the best examples of prudent decisionmaking there is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curzon, the wit is the thing.  He IS funny, and that is why, as you say, we still remember him.</p>
<p>But we need to look at the presidencies of the 20s a little more carefully.  Mencken&#8217;s clever barbs have framed our understanding of those times for too long.  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Times-Revised-Perennial-Classics/dp/0060935502" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.amazon.com');">Paul Johnson</a> (and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/History-American-People-Paul-Johnson/dp/0060930349/sr=1-2/qid=1161230394/ref=sr_1_2/104-1550981-7050339?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.amazon.com');">here</a>) may overpraise Harding, Coolidge and Hoover, but it is good to see a countervailing assessment of these <span class="caps">GOP</span> presidents, if only for balance.</p>
<p><span class="caps">BTW</span>, the discussion of Gamaliel in this post is excellent, and I had never seen all these elements tied together.  The passage where Gamaliel talks the elders out of killing Peter, in Acts, is one of the best examples of prudent decisionmaking there is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curzon</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/10/18/gamaliel-and-gamalielese/comment-page-1/#comment-142323</link>
		<dc:creator>Curzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2177#comment-142323</guid>
		<description>Lex: Well said.  He was as foul a commenter as there was in those days, his saving grace only being that he added some wit to his barbs, for which he is remembered today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lex: Well said.  He was as foul a commenter as there was in those days, his saving grace only being that he added some wit to his barbs, for which he is remembered today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexington Green</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/10/18/gamaliel-and-gamalielese/comment-page-1/#comment-142250</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexington Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2177#comment-142250</guid>
		<description>Mencken cannot be taken as an accurate critic of anybody.  He had nothing good to say about any politician in his day.  He despised Harding, Coolidge, Hoover and FDR.  They weren't all idiots.  In fact, none of them were idiots.  Here is &lt;a href="http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres46.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Harding's inaugural address&lt;/a&gt;.  Not our modern style, but not all that bad either.  

Mencken was a smug egotist.  People who actually had to go about the business of running things should given a more fair assessment than the amusing but vicious barbs from Mencken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mencken cannot be taken as an accurate critic of anybody.  He had nothing good to say about any politician in his day.  He despised Harding, Coolidge, Hoover and <span class="caps">FDR</span>.  They weren&#8217;t all idiots.  In fact, none of them were idiots.  Here is <a href="http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres46.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.bartleby.com');">Harding&#8217;s inaugural address</a>.  Not our modern style, but not all that bad either.</p>
<p>Mencken was a smug egotist.  People who actually had to go about the business of running things should given a more fair assessment than the amusing but vicious barbs from Mencken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Kende</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/10/18/gamaliel-and-gamalielese/comment-page-1/#comment-142103</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Kende</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2177#comment-142103</guid>
		<description>bq. "What is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow; that is the whole Law: the rest is commentary."Â?

You left out the most important part: ..."Now go study."

The entire saying is the response to an absurd request to Hillel asking that he sum up all of Judaism while hopping on one foot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;What is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow; that is the whole Law: the rest is commentary.&#8221;&#194;?</p></blockquote>
<p>You left out the most important part: ...&#8221;Now go study.&#8221;</p>
<p>The entire saying is the response to an absurd request to Hillel asking that he sum up all of Judaism while hopping on one foot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sembawang squid</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/10/18/gamaliel-and-gamalielese/comment-page-1/#comment-142046</link>
		<dc:creator>sembawang squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2177#comment-142046</guid>
		<description>Always good to read a Mencken barb.   I can barely imagine his reaction were he to see what's going on today...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always good to read a Mencken barb.   I can barely imagine his reaction were he to see what&#8217;s going on today&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: von Kaufman-Turkestansky</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/10/18/gamaliel-and-gamalielese/comment-page-1/#comment-142034</link>
		<dc:creator>von Kaufman-Turkestansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2177#comment-142034</guid>
		<description>Wow. I just looked at the Warren Kinsella link (sorry, there's an HTML tag messing it up, mea culpa again). www.warrenkinsella.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I just looked at the Warren Kinsella link (sorry, there&#8217;s an <span class="caps">HTML</span> tag messing it up, mea culpa again). <a href="http://www.warrenkinsella.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.warrenkinsella.com');">http://www.warrenkinsella.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: von Kaufman-Turkestansky</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/10/18/gamaliel-and-gamalielese/comment-page-1/#comment-142033</link>
		<dc:creator>von Kaufman-Turkestansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2177#comment-142033</guid>
		<description>I guess the alternative would have been to coin the term "Warrenish" to describle Harding's English; that might have been a disaster for Canadian mandarin Warren Kinsella:
http://www.warrenkinsella.com/index.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the alternative would have been to coin the term &#8220;Warrenish&#8221; to describle Harding&#8217;s English; that might have been a disaster for Canadian mandarin Warren Kinsella:<br />
<a href="http://www.warrenkinsella.com/index.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.warrenkinsella.com');">http://www.warrenkinsella.com/index.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
