Entry details

Chirol
Author

Chirol

Date

August 10th, 2006

Tags

Comments

4 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Diminishing Returns

Breaking news from the U.K.

Plane Terror Plot Thwarted

Police say they have disrupted a major plot to blow up as many as 20 planes over UK and US cities with explosive devices smuggled aboard as hand luggage. Police are have arrested 20 people in London – the culmination of a covert counter-terrorist operation lasting several months.

Passengers trying to board international flights from the UK are not being allowed to carry on normal hand luggage. Sky News’ Crime Correspondent Martin Brunt said there were concerns that certain explosives, possibly liquid, could be missed during x-ray screening of hand luggage.

Brunt said the threat was thought to be imminent and those arrested were mainly young, British-born Asian men. He said the plan allegedly involved people boarding flights and detonating explosives on planes over UK and US cities.

Considering how much easier it would be to carry out a few simple suicide bombings whether in the subway or simply downtown, this goes to show you that John Robb is correct in saying that symbolic terrorism suffers from the law of diminishing returns. This helps explains why America and Britain haven’t seen small scale attacks at home. As he notes

Each subsequent attack has less of a psychological impact than the first. In order to compensate for this, a terrorism planner must make each subsequent attack even more damaging or symbolically devastating than earlier attacks. The result is a death march until entire terrorism campaign runs out of steam.

Lucky for us.

Comments to this entry

The Glittering Eye » Blog Archive » The solace of diminishing returns
August 10, 2006
1:33 pm
[...] Chirol of Coming Anarchy reminds us of John Robb’s observation that symbolic terror attacks suffer from the law diminishing returns: Each subsequent attack has less of a psychological impact than the first. In order to compensate for this, a terrorism planner must make each subsequent attack even more damaging or symbolically devastating than earlier attacks. The result is a death march until entire terrorism campaign runs out of steam. [...]
Shloky
August 10, 2006
3:50 pm
Ah, but the kicker is that "Constraints Drive Innovation":http://www.shloky.com/?p=127
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Innovations in Terror
August 10, 2006
6:32 pm
[...] This morning I wrote a brief post about the disrupted terror plot in the U.K. I reminded readers of John Robb’s previous post on symbolic terrorism and how it suffers from diminishing returns. Shloky, Coming Anarchy commenter and first rate blogger commented “but the kicker is that Constraints Drive Innovation”. As he’s noted in a previous post of his [...]
sun bin
August 10, 2006
8:00 pm
one can also look at this as how much disproportionately expensive it is to defend against terrorism threat.

all they need is to find a credible threat, cost perhaps a few thousand dollar. we have to lose billions every day.
this is a very asymmetric war. current strategy/tactic just do not work. GWOT needs to be more innovative...