<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pimpin&#8217;!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cominganarchy.com/2006/07/22/pimpin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/07/22/pimpin/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:16:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Curzon</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/07/22/pimpin/comment-page-1/#comment-113327</link>
		<dc:creator>Curzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2005#comment-113327</guid>
		<description>Tripper: Thanks for the kind words.  I agree -- but alas, by Victorian they mean &quot;American Victorian&quot; (i.e. Teddy Rooseveltian).  If there is some jolly Imperial British (i.e. REAL Victorian) garb for sale out there, please do let us know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tripper: Thanks for the kind words.  I agree &#8212; but alas, by Victorian they mean &#8220;American Victorian&#8221; (i.e. Teddy Rooseveltian).  If there is some jolly Imperial British (i.e. <span class="caps">REAL</span> Victorian) garb for sale out there, please do let us know.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rommel</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/07/22/pimpin/comment-page-1/#comment-113311</link>
		<dc:creator>Rommel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2005#comment-113311</guid>
		<description>I KNEW something didn&#039;t look right with Farnsworth and Livingston!
They look more like gamblers in the Wild West then British Victorians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <span class="caps">KNEW </span>something didn&#8217;t look right with Farnsworth and Livingston!<br />
They look more like gamblers in the Wild West then British Victorians.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tripper</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/07/22/pimpin/comment-page-1/#comment-113281</link>
		<dc:creator>Tripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2005#comment-113281</guid>
		<description>Guys,  Lovely stuff,  Respect and all.  But I am a Brit and I have only one point to make:  hats are always, always, worn with a forward rake.  Never, ever, put a hat on the back of your head like in the Farnsworth and Livingston photos above.  If the brim of your hat isn&#039;t just over your eyebrow then you are either an actor or a poseur (is there a difference?).  Remember: think 19thC: we do not wish to see your stupid porcine faces - we wish to admire the cut of your cloth and the quality of your hat.  Keep up the good work.  An admiring subscriber.  Regards, Tripper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,  Lovely stuff,  Respect and all.  But I am a Brit and I have only one point to make:  hats are always, always, worn with a forward rake.  Never, ever, put a hat on the back of your head like in the Farnsworth and Livingston photos above.  If the brim of your hat isn&#8217;t just over your eyebrow then you are either an actor or a poseur (is there a difference?).  Remember: think 19thC: we do not wish to see your stupid porcine faces &#8211; we wish to admire the cut of your cloth and the quality of your hat.  Keep up the good work.  An admiring subscriber.  Regards, Tripper</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yago</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/07/22/pimpin/comment-page-1/#comment-113075</link>
		<dc:creator>Yago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=2005#comment-113075</guid>
		<description>Now that&#039;s a great site.  Women clothing is awful but men were much more elegant back then, for sure.
I&#039;d love some of those silk cravats. Why can&#039;t they just ship overseas?

Know any similar place in Tokyo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s a great site.  Women clothing is awful but men were much more elegant back then, for sure.<br />
I&#8217;d love some of those silk cravats. Why can&#8217;t they just ship overseas?</p>

<p>Know any similar place in Tokyo?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
