Entry details

Curzon
Author

Curzon

Date

July 4th, 2006

Tags

,

Comments

9 Comments so far.
Add yours.

A lot more than a buck ‘o five

This is adapted from a chain email frequently seen this time of year (in the United States). While some aspects may not be completely accurate or verifiable, it should make you think. Because all kidding aside, freedom isn’t free.

* * *

Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?

Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means, well educated. But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured. They signed and they pledged their lives, fortunes, and honor.

Five signers were captured by the British as traitors and tortured before they died.

Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned.

Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army, another had two sons captured.

Nine of the 56 died from wounds or hardships while fighting in the Revolutionary War.

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags.

Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was his reward.

Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton.

At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months.

John Hart was driven from his wife’s bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year, he lived in forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished. A few weeks later, he died from exhaustion and a broken heart.

Norris and Livingston suffered similar fates.

Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution. These were not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means and education. They had security, but they valued liberty more.

They pledged: “For the support of this declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of the divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.”

Some of us take these liberties so much for granted, but we shouldn’t. Because freedom isn’t free.

Comments to this entry

R. Elgin
July 4, 2006
2:09 am
This is a bit better than some of the more dogmatic flag-waving "Proud to be an American" crap that my sister sends me in e-mails. This is the same sister than swears that the idea that smoking kills is invented science, since she married a cigarette junkie in Tenneesse. I honestly wonder if this, and other such examples, are PR products of Republicans in America since they read like such propaganda.

It also illustrates that the same desire to believe in a cause, without reservation or critical thought, exists in America — just like in too many countries of the middle-east whose fundamentalist Islam demands just such devotion.
R. Elgin
July 4, 2006
2:13 am
P.S. Have a happy fourth of July, without the dogma and for the right reasons.
Lexington Green
July 4, 2006
4:17 am
Whatever the details may be, here is an incontrovertable fact.

The signers of the Declaration chose to go to war with the most powerful country in the world, they knew that defeat was very likely, and they knew that if they lost they were more likely than not to be put to death.

They signed anyway.

God bless America.
Tagore
July 4, 2006
1:58 pm
Has anyone read Schama's latest book, Rough Crossings: Britain, the Slaves, and the Revolution? It is about the slaves who sided with the Britons against their masters. They faced similar odds.

They rebelled anyway...

Annuit coeptis?
Lexington Green
July 4, 2006
2:32 pm
The patriots were right and the slaves were right.

History is tragic. I say this in the strict sense that sometimes there are no good options. Or, in this case, no options that do all the good we would like to see.

The ultimate fate of America's slaves had to be resolved by a long path, leading through the Declaration of Independence, and the development over time of a deepening belief in the equality that it spoke of. The seed of freedom planted in America had not reached its full growth in 1776.

The British, of course, freed the slaves in the Empire in 1834. But would they have done so if the South had still been part of the Empire? I think not. So, the USA had to go, so the British Empire's slaves could be a small enough factor that the abolitionist movement could succeed there, building momentum for a similar movement in America.

No one says the American founding was perfect or complete.

It was just a very good thing.
Jing
July 4, 2006
3:44 pm
Bahumbug! Seditious traitors, the lot of them, rebelling against their lawful and godly king.
Dr. Alfred Russel Wallace
July 4, 2006
5:38 pm
Don't forget the (perhaps apocryphal) entry George III made in his diary on July 4, 1776 - "Nothing of any importance happened today"
Dan Nexon
July 4, 2006
8:29 pm
In all fairness, the independence camp gave as good as they took.
Jim Bennett
July 5, 2006
5:37 am
Lex is right on the slavery question. Had the mainland and the British West Indies remained under the same state system, the sugar planters in the Indies could have sold off their slave populations to the mainland cotton plantations as the sugar trade became less profitable. With America independent, but their ambitions to have the Indies join the US unsuccessful, the island planters had no way to liquidate their increasingly unprofitable enterprises. Compensated emancipation in the British empire was partly the triumph fof the newly enriched and mostly Quaker and Nonconformist industrial classes in the English North and Midlands, but it was also a state bailout of a sunset industry, a bit like the rescue of the Penn Central by the Feds.

It's also the case the in the British parliament of the 1830s, monet talked even more loudly than it does today in Congress, and the new wealth of the industrialists was finally able to outbid the old and declining wealth of the planters.

But yeah, dividing the slave territories between Britain and the new USA disrupted the slave system and opened the way to emancipation. Another reason to be glad it happened.

For a good treatment of the economics and politics of emancipation in the antebellum US, read Freehling's Road to Disunion.