Oh ye of little faith! Microstates are coming. In the Balkans, you could write it off as Yugoslav leftovers. In Spain, perhaps some legacy of the Spanish Civil War. Today it’s Scotland. And the trend is becoming clearer by the day. The only question is who’s next!

IJ pointed out the following. Looks like I missed this, good thing our readers have a sharp eye!

A Bill To

Provide for electors in Scotland to petition the House of Commons for a referendum on whether Scotland should withdraw from the United Kingdom; and for connected purposes.

Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:””?

There may be a lot of welcoming parties at the United Nations soon. The middle men are being cut out. The real question here is, who gets the North Sea oil? May be a helpful precedent for Iraq actually!

NOTE: More excellent commentary on microstates and devolution here, at Cynical Nerd.


COMMENTS / 17 COMMENTS

[...] The following is part of an email exchange between Chirol and a very close Italian friend. This friend worked at the polls in the recent referendum and had this additional information to add since microstates and devolution have been all the rage recently. The title of the post is a rather humorous comment from him on what would happen if the North became autonomous. [...]

ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Southern Italy Would Turn into Pakistan added these pithy words on Jun 30 06 at 5:56 pm

A quick note of clarification: I took a great deal more issue with the “neo-medievalism” metaphor than with the claim concerning devolution. If you look closely, my post conditionally affirms it.

Dan Nexon added these pithy words on 29 Jun 06 at 10:19 pm

PS: the “middlemen” aren’t being cut out; the trend points to more middlemen operating on a smaller scale.

Dan Nexon added these pithy words on 29 Jun 06 at 10:22 pm

Dan: True, my apologies. As to your second comment, I guess it depends how you see it. National governments are getting cut out in favor of smaller national governments. But I was referring to middle men as national governments of nations that have other cultural and linguistic minorities in them, concentrated in one geographic area, i.e parts that could break away. But you’re right, it’s just a smaller scale of national government.

Chirol added these pithy words on 29 Jun 06 at 10:27 pm

What will be the impact for Ulster? Even if she stays with the Union, that’d be one funky map…

Dan tdaxp added these pithy words on 29 Jun 06 at 11:23 pm

Wow, Chirol. This trend of yours seems to be unfolding rather rapidly.

Kenneth added these pithy words on 30 Jun 06 at 12:11 am

The North Sea oil will be gone by the time Scotland gets to seriously think about independence, so that’s one less thing to worry about.

Curzon added these pithy words on 30 Jun 06 at 3:19 am

The most dangerous example of this trend, from the U.S. point of view, is in Hawaii. There is a movement – and a bill in the Senate – to form a new race-based government there for descendants of natives. The overwhelming majority of Hawaiians of course want to stay fully within the United States. I don’t think it will pass, but what a mess it would be if this got through Congress.

Kirk H. Sowell added these pithy words on 30 Jun 06 at 4:33 am

I wonder how such a dual government could even be constitutional. Once a US state is a state, it falls under the umbrella of Article IV, Section 4 of the US Constitution:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…

(Not that I needed to remind you of that, Kirk.) Unless if they set up some model based on the Indian nation treaties…

Curzon added these pithy words on 30 Jun 06 at 4:42 am

I think we will see a fair amount of this under the umbrella of the EU, where it is relatively safe to try it. Montenegro can figure on Serbia being deterred from using force, probably.

However, moving to a more localized and smaller and weaker national government, but still under the EU is not really “cutting out the middle man.” It is submitting to a remote and unaccountable government, which you will now face with less bargaining power.

I think the Scotland bill is a gesture, not likely to come to fruition any time soon. Next year is the tricentennial of the 1707 Act of Union that created the United Kingdom, btw.

I’d like to see Belgium break up, which the Flemmish nationalists are pushing for. My only concern is that this might adversely impact the Miss Belgium competition. They had a really great run for a while there, 2002-04. It’s not much of an achievement, but Belgium is a pretty retarded country.

Lexington Green added these pithy words on 30 Jun 06 at 6:42 am

Dear Chirol:

Thanks for linking our piece. First time here, you have a nice blog.

Lexington Green: The breaking up of Belgium is accelarated by the immigrant troubles – there have been several skirmes with Muslim immigrants in recent days – yesterday a Moroccan “youth” was arrested on charges of abduction and rape of two girl children. Several Flemish mayors have banned the head-to-two burkha as opposed to the Francophone Wallonia. In cities like Antwerpen, many Jewish groups have aligned with the Far Right Vlams Party against in what they perceived as the immigrant threat. Now Vlams Pary is a significant politcal force.

cheers,

cynical nerd added these pithy words on 30 Jun 06 at 6:51 am

Kenneth: Indeed, though it’s not my trend per se. Just a topic of interest! Dan at the Duck has been following too.

Kirk: I don’t think the US would even consider letting something like this happen so I wouldn’t worry. Washington isn’t a fan of letting states seceed. My home state learned the hard way back in the 1860s!

Lex: Indeed. As I noted in previous posts, it’s the EU that’s allowing this. Similar trends in regions without any kind of overarching security structure are very dangerous and are likely to make things worse.

In Europe, I’d definitely be watching Belgium, North Italy, obviously Kosovo, and France (like Corsica).

Chirol added these pithy words on 30 Jun 06 at 8:01 am

Who gets the North Sea oil? No doubt any negotiations on independence will settle land and sea borders for all the devolved regions.

In the event that Westminster refuses the regions a vote on independence, they could always turn future elections into a protest vote. Westminster’s attitude to global order, eg the United Nations system and the European Union, may be an important factor.

IJ added these pithy words on 30 Jun 06 at 12:48 pm

Curzon: current Supreme Court doctrine, I believe, is that Article V, Section 4 is non-justicable. I’m not sure that the Hawaiin proposal would comprise, anyway, a non-republican form of government.

Dan Nexon added these pithy words on 30 Jun 06 at 4:02 pm

Typo: Article IV.

Dan Nexon added these pithy words on 30 Jun 06 at 4:02 pm

Who gets the North Sea oil? No doubt any negotiations on independence will settle land and sea borders for all the devolved regions.

“vast amounts of energy are thought to be locked in regions that either overlap the boundaries of consumer nations or are in disputed territory, as in parts of the South China Sea. Building a forum for discussing and addressing such issues could both enhance international stability and lead to new energy development” Bold idea for energy woes: global cooperation

IJ added these pithy words on 01 Jul 06 at 4:23 pm
Return to Top

The Devolution Caravan Keeps Moving

Posted on 29 Jun 06 by Chirol. Subscribe to follow comments on this post. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

DISCUSSION / RECENT ACTIVITY

TAGS / TOPICS AND REGIONS