
Yesterday I finally saw The Battle of Algiers, a 1966 movie in French and Arabic about the nationalist movement in Algeria, directed by an Italian and scored by the venerable Ennio Moricone of whom I am a great fan.
The film covers a series of events in Algiers in the middle of the eight year long Algerian War of Independence. It is mostly based on the memoirs of Sadi Yacef, a National Liberation Front (FLN) military and political leader who was imprisoned in 1957. Yacef wrote his memoirs in prison, and actually plays himself in the film.
With amazing sets, thousands of Algerian extras, and a known terrorist as one of the leading men, The Battle of Algiers has an amazing level of realism. Propagandist proclamations, bomb and letter drops, the use of women and children for the front line are all depicted in great detail. Torture, bombings and other violence are so graphic as to make this film seem more like a documentary.
The movie comes highly recommended, by both readers here at Coming Anarchy and by my War Studies history prof. The film has an amazing story behind it, and its influence reaches far and wide, from the PLO to the Black Panthers. The director, Gillo Pontecorvo, was labeled a “Marxist poet” and the film was dismissed by some as pinko propaganda. Yet it is still extremely relevant, and the Pentagon gave a special screening in 2003.
All of this is covered in the three DVD Criterion Collection edition, which contains numerous background pieces and documentaries. One particularly good documentary about the film has Sadi Yacef, (currently a senator in Algeria) interviewed alongside one of the female FLN bombers (also a high up in the Algerian government). Talk about a trip down justification lane! There is also an interview with a very uncomfortable-looking Richard Clark. Footage from an old interview with Roger Trinquier is interspersed with a survivor of French torture during the Battle.
To sum up, this is a great film that should be viewed both for its content and its artistic quality. Highly recommended for all the CA community. Rent it today!
- BROWSE / IN TIMELINE
- « Formosa: The First Amsterdam
- » Chavez meets Gadhafi
COMMENTS / 11 COMMENTS
lirelou added these pithy words on 18 May 06 at 12:04 amAn excellent film, but like all films, no substitute for history. It helps to remember that the French won the battle of Algiers, and indeed, had defeated the FLN militarily by 1961. What made Algeria “algerian” was Charles De Gaulle’s decision that France would not support the necessary total integration of Algeria, and more importantly, Algerians, into the French national fabric. The idea of a totally equal Franco-Algerian society had been posited by the Army in 1958, and indeed, part of the reason behind the 13 May 1958 coup was to usher in a national government that could implement such measures. De Gaulle surprised those who brought him to power, but he knew his nation better than the professional Army. He set it on the road to disengagement, and recognition of Algerian independence, whatever the battlefield reality. For a bird’s eye view of this period, see the second part of Jean Pouget’s “Bataillon R.A.S.” (available in French only) p.s. The Lt (Sava) Steppanovitch mentioned in Pouget’s book, and who helped him coordinate this coup, later joined the U.S. Army and retired as a Lieutenant Colonel. If still alive, he would make an interesting guest lecturer at the War College.
germanicus added these pithy words on 18 May 06 at 12:38 amI think I met Steppanovich in the late 1980s at the Twin Bridges Marriot near Washington, DC. I think he spent most of his US Army career in Special Forces. [Am I right on this Chirol, or am I mixing him up with someone else?]
germanicus added these pithy words on 18 May 06 at 12:39 amSorry, lirelou, my question above probably should have been directed to you.
Younghusband added these pithy words on 18 May 06 at 12:58 amLirelou, have you seen the Criterion Collection? There is a lot about France winning the battle, but losing the “war” in the documentaries.
lirelou added these pithy words on 18 May 06 at 6:18 amI have not seen the Criterion Collection, but will check it out. This past summer only proved how wise De Gaulle was. But it was a very bitter pill for those who loved Algeria, especially the Harkis and the old Algerian veterans, to swallow. Germanicus. It is possible, but he only attended Special Forces training. After than he was sent to Vietnam, where he “jumped ship” to serve with old Vietnamese comrades in the ARVN Airborne Division (Advisory Team 162). In 1987 he was the U.S. Army Liaison Officer to the 1st French Corps in Baden-Baden (not far from Lahr). One always wondered who was liaisoning with whom. His fraternal and social connections reached into high levels of the French Staff, as many he had known as lieutenants and captains were by that time generals. The first thing you noticed upon entering his office was a table covered with Dien Bien Phu promotional badges, awarded him by the various French units and military course promotions who recognized his service there with the 13th DBLE.
marquer added these pithy words on 18 May 06 at 7:02 amI can echo this recommendation wholeheartedly. It should be clear why the special operations community felt that the film should be viewed before entering into an occupation likely to be bedevilled by urban insurgents.
Note that Pontecorvo does not caricature the French nor portray them as unsympathetic monsters, which would have been easy to do, and which would have similarly been the expected tack given his ideological bent.
Instead, he gives several minutes worth of the film to a speech by the fictional Col. Mathieu of the Paras, who gives a civilly reasoned case for the necessity of torture—in order both to accomplish required military ends and to prevent unnecessary losses of civilian life.
Lexington Green added these pithy words on 18 May 06 at 3:24 pmIn a post on ChicagoBoyz I said this about the movie:
In my darker moods, I’d say this is my favorite movie. A semi-documentary about the Algerian revolution against French rule, and the harsh but (initially) effective measures employed by the French to crush the resistance. While the director, Gillo Pontecorvo was a Marxist and sympathetic to the Algerians, he shows the cruelty of their terrorism without blinking, and he shows the hard-handed French as professional soldiers, without rancor or caricature. Unfortunately, the movie is something of a darling of leftists, who talk about how horrible it is that the captured terrorists are being tortured, while never mentioning that they and their comrades are sneaking bombs into public places to murder women and children. The one-sided critical response to this film shows the moral vacancy at the heart of western liberalism, especially of the academic/intellectual variety. Without regard to all that, this is the best movie about terrorism and guerilla warfare that I know of and truly brilliant movie, period. (Oddly, there are very few still images from the movie available on the net. There is however an excellent book, Gillo Pontecorvo’s The Battle of Algiers by Franco Solinas, which contains many stills and the full script.)
From this: this post about war movies.
germanicus added these pithy words on 18 May 06 at 8:00 pmThanks lirelou, I think I have your man mixed up with another whose last name is a bit similar. However, given your words, I sure would have like to have met and had a few brews with your guy.
Lexington Green: I agree, it is one of my all time favorite movies as well. By the way, wasn’t Pontecorvo’s brother one of our WW II atomic spies—or am I confused on this?
Dan tdaxp added these pithy words on 19 May 06 at 1:50 amBetween ripping off tdaxp and Catholicgauze, does CA have any original posts? :-p
Younghusband added these pithy words on 19 May 06 at 3:22 amHow are you enjoying your worker’s paradise Dan?
Dan tdaxp added these pithy words on 19 May 06 at 5:59 amWell, the pollution sucks, but at least there’s always low prices.
