The first Intifada was successful because it was largely non-violent and managed to turn world opinion against Israel. As Col. Thomas Hammes notes, the Palestinians ordered their people not to use molotov cocktails because it would replace the strongest weapon they had, namely the image of a young Palestinian throwing only rocks against heavily armed Israelis. Israel was portrayed as the colonizer and the PLO were quick to use the media in order to get their message out first and outmaneuver the Israeli press. They successfully marketed themselves as the victim and thereby discredited the Israelis. Meanwhile, they made it clear that the fighting would only stop when the Israelis left the occupied territories.

After their success at Oslo, they were on a path to statehood having accomplished what all the previous Arab-Israeli wars could not. Yet, with the breakout of the al-Aqsa Intifada and the increased use of violence, the word “Palestinian” has almost become synonymous with “suicide bomber” Having squandered all their moral credibility, thrown away their chance at statehood and having become more radical and refusing to recognize Israel’s right to exist, they completely dropped the ball in their 4GW struggle. They lost a great deal of international sympathy, they ruined their message and credibility and ultimately threw away everything they’d gained in 1993 leaving Israel a free hand to respond violently and also unilaterally end the conflict imposing the borders Israel wants. In short, the Palestinians screwed up big time.

Al-Qaeda made the same mistake. In the 90s with the African embassy bombings, Somalia, the USS Cole etc, people had begun to question why the US was propping up Middle Eastern dictators and what we were doing overseas. Americans wanted to indulge their isolationism.

Like the Palestians Intifada I message to the Israeli public, bin Laden was making the point to the U.S. public and our decision makers that the problem was the presence of U.S. troops in an area where they were not wanted. Therefore, the only solution to being hated and attacked waas simply to go home and let the Arabs resolve among themselves who would rule the Middle East.[1]

9/11 was a major error. By bringing the war to the US homeland, Al-Qaeda completely delegitimized their message. Just like the Palestians today, they are calling for the destruction of the US and Israel. Since no state will give up its right to exist, Al-Qaeda has ensured it’s involved in a struggle it can’t win since it cannot physically destroy the US with WMD nor does it have a conventional army to invade with. In fact, instead of getting the US out of the Middle East, they’ve ensured the opposite. Had they maintained their original goals, the US may well have disengaged from the region more.

Having made a mistake by changing their message to “Death to America,” they next began to destroy their support among Muslims. It began with the beheadings in Iraq and culminated with the Amman Bombings. Since then, other smaller attacks such as the recent one in Dahab have continued to lead to decrease support with Muslims protesting against radical Islamists in Amman and only days ago in Egypt. Just as Palestinian is now synonymous with “suicide bomber” or even Hamas, today the word Muslim is almost synonymous with “terrorist.” Al-Qaeda will be in the fight for a long time, but 9/11 wasn’t a huge success but the beginning of their decline.

More can be found by reading The Sling and the Stone and Younghusband, Mark and Dan’s posts on 4GW and 5GW.


COMMENTS / 17 COMMENTS

[...] ComingAnarchy has a fascinating post up analyzing how first the Palestinians and now Al-Qaeda have bungled their respective wars after initial successes.  Read! [...]

The Glittering Eye » Blog Archive » Bungled, too early to tell, or what? added these pithy words on Apr 29 06 at 11:05 pm

[...] Having recently posted on the mistakes of terrorists fighting 4GW wars, this article caught my attention. Whether it’s ultimately true or not is essentially unable to be proven at the moment, but its arguments are nevertheless interesting: [...]

ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Al Qaeda Retreating??? added these pithy words on May 01 06 at 4:12 pm

Hmm… does this imply that al Qaeda’s “system disruption” is more of a 5GW attempt than a 4GW attempt—an effort to change the players rather than merely the correlation of forces?

Dan tdaxp added these pithy words on 29 Apr 06 at 8:00 pm

And might not their current message be one stressing recruitment of more “holy warriors” [“we are the ones waging war on the infidels”] rather than drumming up international support? Just a thought.

germanicus added these pithy words on 29 Apr 06 at 9:29 pm

You don’t seem to have trackbacks, so ping!

Dave Schuler added these pithy words on 29 Apr 06 at 11:07 pm

I can only hope that you are correct. I do believe 100%. Only hope that the American People as a whole agrees with you.Much has been debated about Iran. What to do…how to do it..ect. We need to do SOMETHING. But what? Iraq will come around I believe, But Iran?
No answer from me, I just don’t know, but latest reports are not promising anything positive.
Any ideas?
Email…Eagleswede1@cableone.net
Thank you
Swede1

Swede added these pithy words on 29 Apr 06 at 11:18 pm

I agree about the loss of the message, but don’t you think that saying that “’Palestinian is now synonymous with ‘suicide bomber’” is going too far? Synonymity implies actual overlap in meaning, not in use of words. And it’s not true: even Zionists would not report that “a suicide bomber attacked a bar in Jerusalem today, killing one Israeli and three (other) suicide bombers.” Or imagine: “It is believed that this fundamentalist Islamic group has been training children to become Palestinians in the West Bank…”

Elizabeth added these pithy words on 30 Apr 06 at 8:08 am

Elizabeth: I don’t think it’s going to far but perhaps you misunderstand. I don’t mean that all of them are but, since we’re talking about PR here, if you ask 100 people whats the first thing they think of when they hear “Palestinian” they’ll either say suicide bomber, Hamas, Islamic Jihad or the like.

Chirol added these pithy words on 30 Apr 06 at 8:27 am

Chirol: I know that you don’t think that Palestianians are all suicide bombers (statistically, for every suicide bomber, there must be hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who are not suicide bombers). I simply think that synonymous is too strong a word. To say that Palestinians are strongly associated with suicide bombers is nothing close to being synonymous, and it’s generalizations like this that infuriate the Palestinians to the point of hopelessness. Yeah, I know, it’s not nearly as infuriating as, say, having your kid blown up, but anyway, there’s no point in fanning the flames.

As for your survey, it depends on where you’re doing it. I can imagine a lot of different reactions: “Palestinian” in Israel would probably elicit “maid”, “poor”, or “Muslim”, not “suicide bomber”. In France, “oppressed”, “poor”, “intifada” would be more likely. In Tajikistan, most people would say, “Arab”, “brother”, or “Muslim”. I’d love to hear what the Chinese have to say. It’s only those who get most of their information about Palestine from CNN that would have this opinion: and that is not a huge part of the world population.

Elizabeth added these pithy words on 30 Apr 06 at 8:44 am

Perhaps synonymous is too strong. You’re also correct that reactions will vary depending on the region surveyed. I’d first say it goes without saying the Muslim world will tend to have more positive reactions, but the most important audience I’d say is Americans because only the US has the power to force Israel’s hand (compared to any other country) and thus in that sense, our opinions matter most and I don’t think you’ll find many people who have positive reactions, especially post 9/11. As for Europe, you’re correct that there’s more sympathy there for the Palestinians but I still think if you ask them to say what comes to mind, some terrorism related word will still be at the top of the list even if its #3 or #4 which still shows you how much they’ve ruined their image. I wonder if there are any polls like that.

Chirol added these pithy words on 30 Apr 06 at 8:53 am

Pursuant to Dan’s comment…I’m not sure that al Qaeda, itself, has enough legs on the ground, per square mile, to be a 4GW entity; thus, relies on proxies.

Curtis Gale Weeks added these pithy words on 30 Apr 06 at 2:19 pm

From Wikipedia:

Abdel Rahman alRashed, a Muslim and the general manager of Arab news channel, Al-Arabiya has said: “It is a certain fact that not all Muslims are terrorists, but it is equally certain, and exceptionally painful, that almost all terrorists are Muslims.”_

Chief Wiggum added these pithy words on 30 Apr 06 at 6:04 pm

Wiggum: That should read, “almost all terrorists [since 1995, attacking countries which are fighting wars against or in Muslim countries] are Muslims.” None of the terrorist attacks in Japan in the past two decades were carried out by Muslims. Nearly half of the terrorist attacks carried out in India in the latter half of the last century and in this century were carried out by Hindus. In South Africa, nearly all terrorist attacks were carried out by black animists and Christians. Very few of the terrorist attacks (relative to the overall number) before the 1980s were by Muslims (in the mid-20th century most were by splinter Communist and Anarchist groups and by Christian sectarians from Northern Ireland). In the United States, terrorism on home soil came to be known through the work of “libertarian” and extremist “Christian” political groups during the 80s and 90s. Many of these terrorists are in jail or dead now.

Right now, to a certain group of people, it may seem that most terrorists are Muslims. It is because these people lack a sense of global proportion and history. Terrorism is not a uniquely Muslim phenomenon- not now, nor was it ever. But Muslim terrorists are exceptionally visible right now.

Elizabeth added these pithy words on 02 May 06 at 3:52 am

I’d like to defend the Victorians here by saying that indeed most Americans would equate Palestinians and in fact Muslims with terrorism. With each attack this becomes more and more apparent. I think many of you associate with people who are either not the norm or you simply do not have a feel for the general populations’ attitudes. All I have to do is have a conversation about Islam with my father or any relative or associate here in my mid sized Texas town to get a negative response. This is not bigoted hatred. And yes, perhaps these people are for the most part misinformed but they are perceptive people who see the state of the Middle East and see nothing but violence, hatred and anarchy.

Rommel added these pithy words on 02 May 06 at 4:31 am

Rommel- Americans constitute a whole 5% of the world’s population. I am well-informed about the immesureable ignorance that can be found among even so-called “educated” people in the United States. It’s just that I was thinking of people, not of Americans. Though it would shock most Americans, these two terms are not synonymous, either.

Elizabeth added these pithy words on 02 May 06 at 5:09 am

I agree with the principle Chirol is putting forward, but with regard to al-Qaeda I’m not sure about some aspects of application. Two factual observations regarding Muslim opinion, esp. the Arab world:

1) It is true that the Palestinians have blown much sympathy in the West, but support for Palestinian terrorists – not just regular Palestinians mistakenly associated with terrorists – is quite strong. This is clear, for example, from the fact that they are referred to as shuhada – martyrs – in the mainstream Arab media. Reliable survey data doesn’t exist in the Arab world, but there is an abundance of anecdotal evidence. Example: When Israel kills an Islamic Jihad operative, there are protests in the streets, while these Iranian-sponsored terrorists openly operate in PA-administered areas. I see the same thing in the Isreali English media and the Arabic language media. I use this example because the PIJ has no welfare services like Hamas, so there is no other way to explain way sympathy for them.

We need to be realistic: most Palestinians are pro-terrorist. It isn’t simply that they voted for Hamas, but one of Fatah’s lists was headed by convicted terrorist Marwan Barghouti, and that party maintains its own terrorist militia, the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. The PFLP also got about 4% of the vote, more than Salam Fayad’s Third Way Party, the one party of prominence with no terrorist taint. I would put pro-terrorist support at around 60-65% among the general population.

2) Support for al-Qaeda is clearly less than Hamas and Hizballah, but is substantial nevertheless, ranging from minimal in countries like Turkey and Indonesia to fairly strong in Pakistan and Jordan. Al-Jazeera is the best barometer of Arab opinion there is, not only from its coverage but because of the diversity of its commentators, and while Hamas gets positive coverage and America gets very negative coverage, al-Qaeda gets fairly neutral coveage. After Bin Laden’s recent message the reaction from Arab commentators was mixed (see my post, Bin Laden’s New Message – The Culture War), but safe to say that it was not controversial, or surprising, that some, including the editor of the London-based Al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper, supported Bin Laden’s argument. And I thought it notable that those who supported OBL’s culture war argument didn’t feel the need to separate themselves from him by condemning his killing of civilians. That says a lot.

I agree with the argument that attacks on fellow Muslims makes Islamists unpopular, and I think that Zawahiri and Bin Laden learned this in the 1990s. This is why they condemned the GIA and supported the formation of the GSPC in Algeria, and this is why they have tried to tone down Zarqawi in Iraq. I don’t think that 9/11 was a strategic miscalculation for them in this regard, however, since my observation is that it energized support in most areas. I don’t see any indication that it hurt them much. I think that association with Zarqawi’s murder of so many Iraqis and Jordanians has hurt them. I think that the main thing to hurt them has been the loss of so many key operatives and bases of operation. Were it not for the Taliban’s continued vitality in the Pakistani borderlands, they would be just about done.

Kirk H. Sowell added these pithy words on 02 May 06 at 6:12 am

Kirk: Thanks for your continue expertise and insight. Regarding the Palestinians, I agree they still enjoy a great deal of support in the Muslim world, however, the Muslim world doesn’t have the power to force Israel to deal like the US does. Therefore, I was thinking specifically of the West since they are the group that matters most

Chirol added these pithy words on 02 May 06 at 8:08 am
Return to Top

Another 4GW Mistake

Posted on 29 Apr 06 by Chirol. Subscribe to follow comments on this post. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

DISCUSSION / RECENT ACTIVITY

TAGS / TOPICS AND REGIONS