Entry details

Chirol
Author

Chirol

Date

April 12th, 2006

Tags

, ,

Comments

10 Comments so far.
Add yours.

London and Madrid

Two recent articles on the bombings in London and Madrid have appeared within days of each other. Both are of great interest. First:

Madrid bombings were ‘inspired’ by al-Qaeda

The suspected masterminds of the deadly train bombings in Madrid in 2004 belonged to a local cell “inspired” by al-Qaeda acting to force Spain to withdraw troops from Iraq, according to the judge investigating the attacks, a media report said today. Juan del Olmo, the top judge overseeing the inquiry into Spain’s worst extremist attack, is due to make the announcement this week when he charges at least 30 mainly Moroccan suspects with involvement, centre-left daily El Pais reported.

And secondly, with regard to London:

New claims Iraq war ‘motivated’ London bombings

CALLS for an independent inquiry into the 7 July London attacks were renewed yesterday, amid claims an official report will cite the Iraq war as a motivating factor for the suicide bombers. A “narrative”, being drawn up by a senior civil servant for the Home Office, will detail events leading up to the atrocity, and blame Britain’s foreign policy for radicalising young Muslims, according to a Sunday newspaper. A draft copy of the document – which was called for by Charles Clarke, the Home Secretary, when he resisted demands for an outside inquiry – concludes that Iraq was a “contributory factor”, it was reported.

So, according to the reports, the Madrid bombings were commited by Al-Qaeda copycats as were those in London. Perhaps most important is that neither had much of anything to do with their respective country’s involvement in the war in Iraq. While it was a motivating factor, it wasn’t the only one. It’s not very probable that a group of upstanding hard working citizens all of the sudden decided to find out about bomb making and plot terrorist attacks because the UK and Spain aided the US in overthrowing a monster. The London report for example also notes: “Other factors identified as motivating the four men who blew themselves up on Tube trains and a bus included economic deprivation and social exclusion.”

And lastly, as I’ve noted before, the bombings had little to do with Iraq. The history of Islamic terrorism against the West didn’t start in 2003 and these latest articles say the same thing. The fact is that those people who were already in danger of breaking with society, could have become common criminals as many other poor disgruntled immigrants do. Did one war suddenly change them into murderous Islamists? Similar to World War I, the spark that finally set off the war shouldn’t be confused with the real causes.

SIDENOTE: On a related note, recently translated documents from Iraq provide evidence that Saddam was indeed funding more terrorism than just in Palestine. Where and who? Abu Sayyaf in the Philippines.

Comments to this entry

Curzon
April 12, 2006
12:19 pm
Because 9/11, Bali, Madrid, and London were carried out by a small group of individuals, it's impossible to attribute one root cause.

Did Iraq push them over the edge? Maybe. Was it because they were poor? Perhaps. Because they were outcast by society? Also possible. Or maybe they just had fundamental psychological problems rooted in self-resentment, which, combined with radical Islamic teachings, made it inevitable.

With any factor you can find a counterfactual: Bali happened before the invasion of Iraq; Osama Bin Ladin is filthy rich; Mohammed Atta was educated in the West; and on and on. It's like finding the motive of random crime -- when it comes down to it, there is no one preventive step that could have been taken.

Looking at the biographies of the 9/11 hijackers, the only common theme you can find in the biographies of all of them is that at one point in their life they got very, very angry. Personal success became irrelevant. The only thing that mattered was dying in a blaze of glory that they thought would give them glory and a place in heaven.
Curzon
April 12, 2006
1:12 pm
What politics/psychology/logic can be used to describe sentiments like this? This is one step away from being a remorseless suicide bomber...



Chirol
April 12, 2006
2:01 pm
Curzon: That's easy. Ignorance. This guy obviously spent more time smoking pot and saying peace & love than learning about anything that happened the last 40 years not to mention that his rant proves his own point. After all that time, he's still decided to do absolutely nothing. And where the hell did you find that nonsense!?
Curzon
April 12, 2006
2:12 pm
This guy's minifilms are the only thing that come up if you search for "koizumi" in videos.google...

Watching it just 30 minutes after I read your post made me realize: there are lots of nutty people out there that harbor some pretty violent and evil thoughts, and who knows what can push them over the edge.
Kenneth
April 12, 2006
11:19 pm
"What the @#%?!":http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1799211.html
snow
April 13, 2006
10:15 am
Losers abound in this world and unfortunately some of them are sore losers that want to destroy everything that others have.
Younghusband
April 13, 2006
11:40 am
I like what he said about going to hell for doing nothing... that's a moral argument if I ever saw one!
Pavlov3
April 14, 2006
12:07 am
If he gets his wish, he goes to hell and gets an uncomfortable chair in hell in front of an armored window that peers into a quaint ranch....where Bush and Cheney enjoy their lives with their families for eternity. I say good luck to him.
Joel
April 22, 2006
1:54 am
There were numerous stories about Ansar al-Sunna terrorist groups discussing various plans to implant explosive devices in American police stations and FBI detachments, with the intent to injure or kill as many law enforcers as possible. The plot details discussions about the intent of this group to hire and fund non-islamic militants without a criminal history to act as regular job applicants for Security guard positions, thereby accessing numerous areas of Federal buildings including the basement. Another story involves the plot to infect food and meet factories with deadlly strains of virus as well as using feeding insects as vectors in transmitting viruses in agricultural fields. Various militants appear to operate suspicious biotech laboratories, according to the story.
Kirk H. Sowell
April 23, 2006
1:51 am
The "franchise model" of terrorism is actually a new theory in understanding terrorism today. It does like this - al-Qaeda has a blueprint for terrorism that it propogates in various ways, including the free advertising it gets from the media when attacks succeed. Local groups which identify ideologically with radical Islam then take the model and form their own franchise. You don't need to know the founder personally to make your own, you just have to know the formula.

This formula can be hard to stop precisely because it is locally-organized and not centrally controlled. On the other hand, local, self-energized miscreants tend to be of a much lower-quality terrorist than the Khaled Shaik Muhammads of the world, so they make more mistakes and are easier to stop. Also, al-Qaeda has resorted to trying to inspire local copycats partly out of necessity; because we have killed and captured so many mid-level al-Qaeda operatives, they have a hard time operating the way they could a few years ago. So to a degree the threat is lessened - the U.S. hasn't been hit since 2001 for this reason mainly, not due to Homeland Security being so good - but it virtually impossible to eliminate entirely because it can recreate itself spontaneously.

And the scary thing about that video is that there are a lot of people that ignorant, but without the excuse of having had their brain fried by long-term chemical manipulation.