Entry details

Curzon
Author

Curzon

Date

March 23rd, 2006

Tags

, ,

Comments

7 Comments so far.
Add yours.

History & Morality


An elementary understanding of the 20th century should make this easy to understand.

How would you have described Pol-Pot in the early 1970s or Mao Zedong in the late 1940s? Better yet, how would you have compared them to the competition?

The BBC’s general ignorance of the last century came out when they recently interviewed “Prachanda” (The Fierce One), leader of Nepal’s Maoist rebel forces (see the interview transcript here). The interview is worth a read, but the article about the interview is grotesque. The correspondent waxes romantic about the mastermind of civilian slaughter, teacher executions, and children abductions.

The 52-year-old man I met, with his speckled beard, was mild-mannered, shy, joking, laughing nervously – more humorous than intimidating and without the overt charisma of some revolutionary leaders. He looked more like a popular uncle [sound familiar?] than a communist who has been underground since 1981 and waging war for a decade.

Who cares what crimes he’s got on his record—the man has a sense of humor!

Of course, it’s pretty easy for the BBC to pass judgment when the incumbent monarch is a thug wearing an Opera fascist uniform. But we’re not talking about democrats fighting Big Brother. This is not Good v.s. Evil. Like many things in life, it’s a choice between a bad option and an even worse one, first discussed on this blog this time last year. When Pinochet ruled Chile, his regime killed 3,000. That’s an equivalent to the King; at best we can hope for is that this thug will lead to some long-term benefits for this very poor country. By contrast, Pol Pot killed up to two million people and left Cambodia in ruins. That is the alternative embodied by “The Fierce One.”

SIDENOTE: Who would have thought that Xinhua has a page for its Nepal stories and surprisingly wastes no words in listing every atrocity of the rebels. The rebels may be Maoist, but the joint US-UK-India abandonment of Nepal has given the Chinese a golden opportunity to expand their influence in the Himalayas, and they’re taking that chance.

Comments to this entry

Dr. Alfred Russel Wallace
March 23, 2006
2:32 am
Alas 'personal likeability' is the most important qualification for a leader today, not only for the press, but also for the electorate. From any sort of ethical standpoint, the King should go, but not to be replaced by the Maoists"¦ Another demonstration that democrats are their own worst enemies when they allow themselves to be divided and conquered in order to protect their personal fiefdoms"¦ Nepal seems doomed until a new leader with personal charisma appears.
Dan
March 23, 2006
4:57 am
The BBC's general ignorance of the last century came out when they recently interviewed "Prachanda"Â? (The Fierce One), leader of Nepal's Maoist rebel forces (see the interview transcript here). The interview is worth a read, but the article about the interview is grotesque.


Sickeningly, I know one of his apologists.

The most recent article from Xinhua... 300 Students Abducted in eastern Nepal
madhatterz
March 23, 2006
5:35 am
"evil men often fight between themselve" the thing most communists and revolutionaries never do understand is that if the majority of the people want radical changes a revolution will at some point occur.. whereupon the stablishement is removed and a new is established.. When revolutionaries often talk about revolution they do not see that they are often the supreme minority willing to go that far.. so if they actualyl could succeed the result would just be the same of that was before.. a new minority regime ruling over a enslaved population... I think at best any political seeking radical changes at most can do is to inform the people and let the people decide themselves ...

"the authotorian state is bound to fail at some point no matter how much the authotorian fight against it.."
madhatterz
March 23, 2006
5:38 am
lol u could take that picture and photomagic it so that the uniformed figure is on both sides just with different faces.... that would say it all
Give that man a hand! at The Marmot’s Hole
March 23, 2006
5:59 am
[...] The War on Extremities is not, apparently, confined to Korea, with a Japanese rightist nearly severing his hand in front of the National Diet Building to protest Tokyo’s policies toward North Korea. Said the Mutant Frog: Curzon, if this keeps up, it looks like you may not be able to make fun of Korean as easily. What’s a few psychos over there cutting off fingers compared to entire hands in Japan? [...]
snow
March 23, 2006
6:40 am
These Maoists are a scary bunch. Judging by the history of communist insurgencies, Nepal could be in for a horrible repeat of history with their own version of Pol Pot. I fear for the worst for the Nepalese people. Will leftists such as Chomsky jump to their defense as he did for the Cambodian mass murderer?
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Colonize Nepal!
April 15, 2006
4:20 pm
[...] The West must take over Nepal! Though politics is usually the study of picking the lesser evil, I’d like to propose the my own to Nepal’s continuing anarchy. When it comes to choosing between the Maoists or the King, most debates end up going nowhere with misguided idealists attacking the King’s autocratic rule and forgetting the Maoists daily atrocities and the lessons from Cambodia. Realists acknowledge the King is the worst thing for the Nepalese, except for the Maoists and thus are left with supporting him. Yet, what would a third solution look like? [...]