Brian, who also blogs at American Footprint, has a short and interesting post up on the Spanish exclave of Ceuta. As someone with a keen interest in enclaves and exclaves, I offer some of it for our readers:
What’s more, Ceuta has historically been a gateway to Europe rather than one to Africa. As noted above, the city was difficult to take, but even after it was taken, the mountains surrounding it meant that you couldn’t easily advance into the Moroccan interior. However, many invasions of the Iberian Peninsula and reinforcements of Muslim positions there were launched from its harbor. In fact, one could take this “gateway” pattern even up to the present, where desperate African economic migrants try to use it as a stepping-stone to continental Europe.These historical and geographical factors make the competing Spanish and Moroccan claims to the enclave more complex than it might first appear. The Moroccan claim draws its legitimacy primarily from geography, in that everything on the North African coast is properly the territory of North African states. Spain, on the other hand, claims it not primarily on the basis of the 1415 conquest, but rather as part of a broader claim to the territies of the 10th-century Umayyad caliphate of Cordoba.

Comments to this entry
Yago
March 13, 2006
3:41 pm
Yago
March 13, 2006
3:44 pm
lirelou
March 15, 2006
6:23 pm
Yago, yo tampoco no he oido jamas nada parecido. Sin embargo, el argumento tiene bien su validez, siendo que en el derecho de antano el estado que conquisto a otro sucedio en titulo a las tierras de aquel.
!Sant Yago y Espana!
A Few Euros More
March 19, 2006
10:30 pm
Brian Ulrich writes a brief history of Ceuta. What's more, Ceuta has historically been a gateway to Europe rather than one to Africa. As noted above, the city was difficult to take, but even after it was taken, the mountains...
africanstudiesguy
March 25, 2006
10:27 pm