Entry details

Chirol
Author

Chirol

Date

March 13th, 2006

Tags

, ,

Comments

5 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Ceuta in History

Brian, who also blogs at American Footprint, has a short and interesting post up on the Spanish exclave of Ceuta. As someone with a keen interest in enclaves and exclaves, I offer some of it for our readers:

What’s more, Ceuta has historically been a gateway to Europe rather than one to Africa. As noted above, the city was difficult to take, but even after it was taken, the mountains surrounding it meant that you couldn’t easily advance into the Moroccan interior. However, many invasions of the Iberian Peninsula and reinforcements of Muslim positions there were launched from its harbor. In fact, one could take this “gateway” pattern even up to the present, where desperate African economic migrants try to use it as a stepping-stone to continental Europe.

These historical and geographical factors make the competing Spanish and Moroccan claims to the enclave more complex than it might first appear. The Moroccan claim draws its legitimacy primarily from geography, in that everything on the North African coast is properly the territory of North African states. Spain, on the other hand, claims it not primarily on the basis of the 1415 conquest, but rather as part of a broader claim to the territies of the 10th-century Umayyad caliphate of Cordoba.

Go read the rest.

Comments to this entry

Yago
March 13, 2006
3:41 pm
Ceuta, please, not Cueta.
Yago
March 13, 2006
3:44 pm
and I'm Spanish, but have never heard anybody claiming it as part of the Caliphate. We're not the Caliphate, nobody claims to be its succesor. Spain claims Ceuta because we conquered the land and founded the city. It has been a Spanish city centuries earlier than the present state of Morocco appeared.
lirelou
March 15, 2006
6:23 pm
If memory serves, the Spanish campaigns in North Africa (under Cardinal Cisneros?) also led to two military innovations. One was the placing of artillery tubes on wheels, so that they could be more easily moved from position to position. The second was a professional corps of soldiers to serve and manipulate the guns. Prior to that, the artillerists were basically the tradesmen and scientists who cast the guns, often on site, propped them up, mixed the powder, and supervised the loading, laying, and firing. Back in Spain, the guns could be moved by peasants with draft animals who were contracted and paid for their work. In North Africa, with its different agricultural base, this was not feasible, and thus the need for a professinal corps or artillery soldiers. THe idea was later carried to Italy with the Duque de Alba. Are there any Redlegs out there who can either confirm or refute this?

Yago, yo tampoco no he oido jamas nada parecido. Sin embargo, el argumento tiene bien su validez, siendo que en el derecho de antano el estado que conquisto a otro sucedio en titulo a las tierras de aquel.

!Sant Yago y Espana!
A Few Euros More
March 19, 2006
10:30 pm
Ceuta's place in history

Brian Ulrich writes a brief history of Ceuta. What's more, Ceuta has historically been a gateway to Europe rather than one to Africa. As noted above, the city was difficult to take, but even after it was taken, the mountains...
africanstudiesguy
March 25, 2006
10:27 pm
Anyone who claims that Ceuta belongs to Spain based on the fact that Ceuta was part of the Caliphate is patently wrong, as is the claim that Ceuta belongs to Spain because "we conquered the land and founded the city." Both these statements are incorrect because Spain bases its claim to Ceuta on the Treaty of Lisbon of January 1st, 1668. When PORTUGAL, the nation who CONQUERED Ceuta seceded it to Spain. The Portuguese King John (Joao the first) conquered Ceuta from the Moors in 1415, and thereby owned Ceuta by right of conquest. Spain then received Ceuta from the Portuguese as per the Treaty of Lisbon. The Spanish claim therefore rests on two facts 1) Ceuta was owned by the Portuguese by right of conquest and 2) Portugal legally transferred its ownership to Spain through the Treaty of Lisbon in 1668. As a previous post pointed out, Spain does not claim to be a successor state to the Caliphate of Cordoba, and therefore if it is not a legal successor to the Caliphate, it can't claim to have "historic territorial claims" based on the Caliphate. Also, note that the claim by a Spanish citizen (I assume) that "we conquered the land and founded the city" is also completely wrong. 1) The city of Ceuta has existed long before the Spanish were involved there, and so the Spanish did NOT found the city and 2) neither did the Spanish "conquer the land" since the Portuguese had already done that. They conquered the city in 1415 and successfully held it against the Moors until it was seceded to Spain in 1668.