Eddie from Live From the FDNF has the latest information on US military cooperation with India:

News that Robert D. Kaplan fans might appreciate. It fits in line with the promising “light footprint” outline that Kaplan praised and gamely played against “big army” examples in his recent “Imperial Grunts”. Low-level ops like this should become more common barring any potential pitfalls in India-US relations.

WAPO:

CHAUBATIA, India—More than half a century after independence, foreign soldiers have returned to this onetime colonial garrison of tin-roofed bungalows, stone churches and panoramic Himalayan views. But this time, the soldiers’ accents are American, not British, and their purpose is not to subdue India but to cultivate it as an ally.

In the latest of a series of such exercises, 120 U.S. combat troops have come here to train with their Indian counterparts in areas such as counterinsurgency and peacekeeping. Besides taking classroom instruction, they are firing Indian weapons, bonding with Indian soldiers over games of soccer and volleyball, and even developing a taste for vegetarian cuisine, albeit with spices toned down for sensitive American palates.


COMMENTS / 2 COMMENTS

Whatever criticism one might heap on the Brits for their colonization of the subcontinent, when they pulled out, they left two viable states in their wake with the nucleus of competent armed forces. From a legal perspective, the Indian and Pakistani armed forces may only date to 1947, but the foundational traditions of the regiments which compose both armies go back well before that and are a tribute to British military organization and practice of the colonial period when some regiments (v.g. the Gurkhas) were created, while others (Punjabis, Rajastanis, Sikhs, etc) were crafted from already existant subcontinental military “peoples” and traditions. I recall an Indian LTC from my command and general staff college days whose great pride was the he commanded the 2nd Bat, 5th Gurkha Rifles. His regimental mess match boxes bore portraits of the 2nd/5th Gurkha’s three Victoria Cross winners. This was in marked contrast to the Vietnamese army of the ARVN period, which placed its emphasis upon post-French colonial history, and discouraged recognition that any of its formations had ever fought under French command, despite the glaring fact that its very best formations had come from the ranks of French paratroop, Foreign Legion, and Commando units.

lirelou added these pithy words on 26 Jan 06 at 4:51 am

PINR has a good recent analysis of China’s reaction to India’s attempts to step out and define itself militarily and diplomatically. If the Indians are reading the situation similar to PINR, there may be very fertile ground for increasing US-India relations.
http://www.pinr.com/report.php?ac=view_report&report_id=434&language_id=1

Thanks for the link. I hope Kaplan includes at least a chapter on India in his next book about the Navy and Air Force.

Eddie added these pithy words on 09 Feb 06 at 4:20 am
Return to Top

Imperial Grunts in India

Posted on 25 Jan 06 by Chirol. Subscribe to follow comments on this post. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

DISCUSSION / RECENT ACTIVITY

TAGS / TOPICS AND REGIONS