<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CISS Event: Beyond the Three Block&#160;War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cominganarchy.com/2006/01/15/ciss-event-beyond-the-three-block-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/01/15/ciss-event-beyond-the-three-block-war/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:25:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/01/15/ciss-event-beyond-the-three-block-war/comment-page-1/#comment-67738</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=1563#comment-67738</guid>
		<description>Younghusband, this might interest you....
&quot;Strategic Scouts For Strategic Corporals&quot; Its a good magazine feature length article that proposes the use of Foreign Area Officers at the tactical level.
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/milreview/sargent.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Younghusband, this might interest you&#8230;.<br />
&#8220;Strategic Scouts For Strategic Corporals&#8221; Its a good magazine feature length article that proposes the use of Foreign Area Officers at the tactical level.<br />
<a href="http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/milreview/sargent.pdf">http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/milreview/sargent.pdf</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJ</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/01/15/ciss-event-beyond-the-three-block-war/comment-page-1/#comment-61540</link>
		<dc:creator>IJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=1563#comment-61540</guid>
		<description>_Perceptions of risk vary enormously_

&quot;Thomas Barnett writes of the competing pressures in the United States&quot;:http://www.keepmedia.com/pubs/Esquire/2005/11/01/1037812?page=1

&quot;You&#039;d think the great search for the replacement for the Soviet threat would have finally ended after 9/11, but sadly that&#039;s not the case. Too many profits on the line. Army generals are fed up with being told that the global war on terrorism is the Pentagon&#039;s number-one priority, because if it were, they and their Marine Corps brethren would be getting a bigger slice of the pie instead of so much being set aside for some distant, abstract threat. It&#039;s bodies versus bucks, folks. . .&quot;

The perception in the US also determines the defence budgets of its sometimes allies, including the UK and Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Perceptions of risk vary enormously</em></p>

<p><a href="http://www.keepmedia.com/pubs/Esquire/2005/11/01/1037812?page=1">Thomas Barnett writes of the competing pressures in the United States</a></p>

<p>&#8220;You&#8217;d think the great search for the replacement for the Soviet threat would have finally ended after 9/11, but sadly that&#8217;s not the case. Too many profits on the line. Army generals are fed up with being told that the global war on terrorism is the Pentagon&#8217;s number-one priority, because if it were, they and their Marine Corps brethren would be getting a bigger slice of the pie instead of so much being set aside for some distant, abstract threat. It&#8217;s bodies versus bucks, folks. . .&#8221;</p>

<p>The perception in the US also determines the defence budgets of its sometimes allies, including the UK and Canada.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yo Yo Ma</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/01/15/ciss-event-beyond-the-three-block-war/comment-page-1/#comment-61538</link>
		<dc:creator>Yo Yo Ma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=1563#comment-61538</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;What&#039;s not to trust?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s not about trust, it&#039;s about his protecting his PNM worldview from other competitive memes and making his ideas more marketable by downgrading other IR memes.  We&#039;ll see in fifty to hundred years who was right I guess. Barnett, Kaplan, or both may end up just being footnotes in an archaic book on IR theory.

You have to wonder about Barnett though.  A guy who doesn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;&quot;trust&quot;&lt;/i&gt; a blog because it &lt;i&gt;&quot;revels&quot;&lt;/i&gt; too much in a competitive theory yet goes on to say that this blog &lt;i&gt;&quot;does get around and you have to respect that.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; Blog politics at its finest. Someone should set Kaplan and him up for a death by powerpoint no-holds-barred match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;What&#8217;s not to trust?&#8221;</i></p>

<p>It&#8217;s not about trust, it&#8217;s about his protecting his <span class="caps">PNM </span>worldview from other competitive memes and making his ideas more marketable by downgrading other IR memes.  We&#8217;ll see in fifty to hundred years who was right I guess. Barnett, Kaplan, or both may end up just being footnotes in an archaic book on IR theory.</p>

<p>You have to wonder about Barnett though.  A guy who doesn&#8217;t <i>&#8220;trust&#8221;</i> a blog because it <i>&#8220;revels&#8221;</i> too much in a competitive theory yet goes on to say that this blog <i>&#8220;does get around and you have to respect that.&#8221;</i> Blog politics at its finest. Someone should set Kaplan and him up for a death by powerpoint no-holds-barred match.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Younghusband</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/01/15/ciss-event-beyond-the-three-block-war/comment-page-1/#comment-61499</link>
		<dc:creator>Younghusband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=1563#comment-61499</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up Mark.

bq. I don&#039;t trust the Coming Anarchy for the most part because they revel a bit too much in that Fourth Generation Warfare-way, and because they seem too accepting of Robert Kaplan&#039;s view of things (hence the name, one imagines).

What&#039;s not to trust?

Dan, scan &quot;â€œ focus &quot;â€œ act is like the OODA loop for the individual troop. It is Metz&#039;s ideal qualities for the &quot;Strategic Corporal.&quot; Once I get the conference proceedings, with the full notes, I can post more detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up Mark.</p>

<blockquote><p>I don&#8217;t trust the Coming Anarchy for the most part because they revel a bit too much in that Fourth Generation Warfare-way, and because they seem too accepting of Robert Kaplan&#8217;s view of things (hence the name, one imagines).</p></blockquote>

<p>What&#8217;s not to trust?</p>

<p>Dan, scan &#8220;&acirc;€œ focus &#8220;&acirc;€œ act is like the <span class="caps">OODA </span>loop for the individual troop. It is Metz&#8217;s ideal qualities for the &#8220;Strategic Corporal.&#8221; Once I get the conference proceedings, with the full notes, I can post more detail.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark safranski</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/01/15/ciss-event-beyond-the-three-block-war/comment-page-1/#comment-61437</link>
		<dc:creator>mark safranski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=1563#comment-61437</guid>
		<description>YH,

Here you go:

http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/weblog/archives2/002832.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">YH,</span></p>

<p>Here you go:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/weblog/archives2/002832.html">http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/weblog/archives2/002832.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/01/15/ciss-event-beyond-the-three-block-war/comment-page-1/#comment-61433</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=1563#comment-61433</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I&#039;d be interesting in more 3BW Theory posts on CA.

Scan-Focus-Act sounds like Boyd&#039;s Observe-Orient-[Decide]-Act

Self-promotion: the civilian expert, systematic, approach should be found in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://tdaxp.blogspirit.com/archive/2006/01/14/the-virtual-department-of-the-miscellaneous-and-the-end-of-m.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Military-Industrial-SysAdmin-Complex&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I&#8217;d be interesting in more 3BW Theory posts on <span class="caps">CA.</span></p>

<p>Scan-Focus-Act sounds like Boyd&#8217;s Observe-Orient-[Decide]-Act</p>

<p>Self-promotion: the civilian expert, systematic, approach should be found in a <a href="http://tdaxp.blogspirit.com/archive/2006/01/14/the-virtual-department-of-the-miscellaneous-and-the-end-of-m.html">Military-Industrial-SysAdmin-Complex</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJ</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2006/01/15/ciss-event-beyond-the-three-block-war/comment-page-1/#comment-61428</link>
		<dc:creator>IJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=1563#comment-61428</guid>
		<description>The disparity is increasing in &quot;spending by NATO members&quot;:http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2005/p05-161.pdf.  The top three spenders (proportionately) are the USA, with defence expenditure estimated at 3.8% of its gross domestic product for 2005; Turkey at 3.2%; and Greece at 3.1%.  Perceptions of risk vary enormously.

Germany spends only 1.4%, and &quot;today we read&quot;:http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=68282006 that a leading politician there is calling for further cuts - by reducing the order for Eurofighter jets by a third, saving $1.5 billion.  Moreover, &quot;He also called for a scaling down of orders from the British, Spanish and Italian governments, which are involved in the project.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The disparity is increasing in <a href="http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2005/p05-161.pdf">spending by <span class="caps">NATO </span>members</a>.  The top three spenders (proportionately) are the <span class="caps">USA, </span>with defence expenditure estimated at 3.8% of its gross domestic product for 2005; Turkey at 3.2%; and Greece at 3.1%.  Perceptions of risk vary enormously.</p>

<p>Germany spends only 1.4%, and <a href="http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=68282006">today we read</a> that a leading politician there is calling for further cuts &#8211; by reducing the order for Eurofighter jets by a third, saving $1.5 billion.  Moreover, &#8220;He also called for a scaling down of orders from the British, Spanish and Italian governments, which are involved in the project.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
