In the spirit of ComingAnarchy’s love of Geography, history and geopolitics, I’d like to introduce the first in a series of posts on a geographical oddity which has led to a great deal of political trouble throughout history, namely, the enclave and exclave. An enclave is a piece of land which is totally surrounded by a foreign territory. If another country has sovereignty over it, it is also called an exclave of that other country. Thus, they have the same meaning, but differ only in the perspective. Sound odd? They are much more common than most people think.

Left side: C is B’s exclave, and A’s enclave.
Right side: D is B’s exclave, but is not an enclave.
Whereas Nargono-Karbagh is an Armenian exclave located inside Azerbaijan, Kaliningrad is an exclave of Russia but not an enclave since it is not totally surrounded by a single country. Additionally, some countries may be enclaved inside another country but not be a true enclave because they have access to open waters. A good example is Gambia, which is prevented from being an enclave by a small strip of ocean. Others would be Brunei and Monaco.

Other versions of enclaves include:
Coastal Fragments: A country that cannot be reached from the country it belongs to except through international waters. Examples: Gibraltar, Dubrovnik, Alaska.
Extraterritoriality:Embassies and military bases are usually exempted from the jurisdiction of the host country, i.e., the laws of the host nation the embassy is in do not typically apply to the land of the embassy or base itself.
Next up in the series:
II. The Caucasus
Enjoy geography fans!

Comments to this entry
Nick
December 19, 2005
10:03 pm
I love the site, though. Keep up the good work.
triticale
December 20, 2005
1:35 am
Nathan Hamm
December 20, 2005
2:24 am
I have to assume that you are talking about exclaves and enclaves as political concepts rather than ethnic or national "islands" cut off from the homeland (where their nation holds dominant political power). If so, we could get all technical-like, make Armenians 10 kinds of angry, and point out that Nagorno-Karabakh is legally Azeri territory. It was "autonomous" and voted to declare independence from the Azeri SSR under the Soviet Union, but still Azeri nonetheless. But then again, it's kind of sort of an independent state. We can give that assertion a wink and a nod, and were we to consider it de facto part of Armenia, it's not completely surrounded by territory controlled by another state.
I can't seem to find a good map, but the enclaves around the Ferghana Valley are a damned mess.
And, just for the sake of good trivia, who can name the coastal exclaves of the 48 contiguous United States? Bonus for not looking it up.
Current World Affairs - CWA » Blog Archive » Enclaves and Exclaves
December 20, 2005
5:43 am
Chirol
December 20, 2005
6:45 am
Nick: Actually
Many countries have coastal fragments that can't be directly accessed from the mainland except by boat or aeroplane. An extreme example of this is Alaska, detached from the Lower 48 of the United States of America by Canada, but at least four other tiny parts of the USA can't be reached overland except by entering Canada:
Olympus
December 20, 2005
2:28 pm
Fabian
December 20, 2005
11:43 pm
Chirol
December 21, 2005
2:02 pm
Olympus: Lesotho is an enclaved country. Gambia, as noted, is not. The only other two enclaved countries in the world are San Marino and Vatican City in Italy.
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Enclaves II: The Caucasus
December 21, 2005
10:06 pm
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Enclaves III: The Fergana Valley
December 23, 2005
5:40 pm
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Enclaves IV: Europe
January 1, 2006
8:06 pm
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Enclaves V: The Rest
January 10, 2006
6:48 pm