Entry details

Curzon
Author

Curzon

Date

October 4th, 2005

Tags

,

Comments

12 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Information Warfare: The Battle of the Hydaspes River

Younghusband hated the film Alexander, but I loved it. (He liked Gladiator, I hated it—so our tastes often differ when it comes to films.) But rewatching my favorite scenes from the film, the portrayal of Alexander’s trec into India, specifically the Battle of Hydaspes River, is truly beautiful.

First, here’s the history they don’t tell you. Approaching India through the Khyber Pass, Alexander’s army came to the bank of the Hydaspes River, where the King of Porus sat on the opposite bank ready to repel any crossings. The Hydaspes is a deep and fast moving river—an attacking army forced to cross the river would face a major disadvantage.

What did Alexander do? Information warfare, otherwise known as the expectations game. He waited several days, marching his troops up and down the banks, testing the watters with apparent failure, and spreading rumors among the local peasants that the water were too high. This was soon learnt by the King of Porus, and the Indians became complacent.

A few days later, Alexander crossed the Hydaspes with a small force seventeen miles upstream. The King, seeing the main body of the army still in front of him, did not believe that it was a significant crossing, and sent only a small cavalry force under his son to oppose it. The force was easily routed, and the prince was killed.

Realizing that the force remaining across the river was the diversionary force and that Alexander was leading a smaller attack force, the King moved to attack, but was caught off guard and ended up fighting on two fronts. A map of the crossing is here, a map of the battle plan can be seen here.

The battle was deadly—Macedonian phalanxes, accustomed to cavarly and infantry, faced armored war elephants. Both sides suffered heavy casualties, and this is what the movie Alexandershows best.


Phalanx v.s. elephant!

But imagine if the invading Macedonians didn’t have the advantage of information warfare. In politics and war, seducing your enemy with the belief that he is the stronger position is one way to gain the upper hand.

Comments to this entry

sun bin
October 5, 2005
6:46 am
i think gladiator sucks. but i agree with your pal younghusband's ciritcism about alexander the 'gay'.

the film lacks coherence, and failed to portray gaugamela, and ... hydaspes. you map alone is much better than that whole film.

i don't understand why hollywood became so reluctant to show maps today. if for visual effect, with all the CGI, they could have shown the aerial view of how Drius was cut into his left field in gaugamela. but all we saw was chaotic body fights.

gladiator's opening scene is totally confusing, same stupidity of focuing on sword fights. you don't know who attacked the left and who was on the right in the battle. the at the end the roman emperor was stupid enough to go into the coliseum to challenge maximus as if he was playing in a cheap HK martial art film.
Nathan
October 5, 2005
6:52 am
Damn it! I never thought a casual mention of someone liking this movie would be enough to convince me to finally watch it...
sun bin
October 5, 2005
6:57 am
nathan,

you can cut directly into the war scenes though :) still worth seeingg and won't miss much of the moive.
Curzon
October 5, 2005
10:47 am
nathan, the director's cut just came out too!
Younghusband
October 5, 2005
1:07 pm
I feel I must defend my views on Gladiator. I like Gladiator in the same way I like "The Swordsman II":http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103295/. In other words, I did not approach Gladiator as a serious historical movie whereas I expected Alexander to be a truly historical movie and was thus disappointed. That's all.

By the way, anybody watching "Rome":http://www.hbo.com/rome/ now? I just got the first four eps and am gonna give it a look.
Curzon
October 5, 2005
1:56 pm
ROME RULES! Post forthcoming.
Gollios
October 5, 2005
2:01 pm
Just to warn you, this is slightly off topic.

Speaking of movies...in my opinion one of the best scenes of Napoleonic combat was in Kubrick's "Barry Lyndon." It was slow, measured, and although it didn't show any views of grand strategy I though it showed the viewpoint of the average soldier quite well. Anyone else have recommendations for war films showing that era?

(The duels in that movie were also superbly shot...as were those in "The Duelists.")
Nathan
October 5, 2005
7:52 pm
Rome does rule!

Okay, I watched a couple minutes of Alexander, and I think I might have to be drunk or really tired for it. I loathe Colin Farrell.
Zhang Fei
October 5, 2005
11:33 pm
sun bin: the at the end the roman emperor was stupid enough to go into the coliseum to challenge maximus as if he was playing in a cheap HK martial art film.

Chinese emperors typically inherited their position. Roman emperors usually had to fight for theirs. Commodus inherited his position and may have tried to make up for this by participating in gladiatorial contests. The final scene in Gladiator was fictional, as was the character Maximus, as well as the portrayal of Commodus as effeminate. But Commodus was personally quite the pugilist*, although somewhat lacking in other important qualities of a leader. But look at it this way - even one of the greatest of the Roman emperors, Julius Caesar, ended up getting murdered.

* The real Commodus would probably have defeated any Roman legatus (Romans did not use the term "general") put before him.
sun bin
October 6, 2005
3:15 am
ZF, thanks. i am aware of that theory.

however, i still think it is implausibly fictional.
because as i know (correct me if i am wrong), coliseum floor is for slave and animal fighting. the winner will be emancipated as free citizen.
has any noble, aristocrat, or even citizen ever fought on the coliseum floor?
to demonstrate bravery and legitimacy why wouldn't comolus go for a duel with someone at his status, or fight a real war?
winning over a wounded slave is not bravery.

well. this is a movie. i am probably thinking too much.
Cullen Masterson
October 6, 2005
6:12 am
The Russian "War and Peace" replicated the battle of Boradino man for man and had overhead helicopter shots. Seven years to make. The female lead had her teenage scenes shot when she was 16. She was 23 by completion of filming, so adult shots were filmed as she grew into them. Had all the great Russian actors of the day in various roles. Only the female lead and Prince Andrei were amateurs. He had been a machinist.
Alexander Karatis
October 6, 2005
7:11 am
Alexander was trully a great film I loved the emotion, the politics, and Colin Farrel really earned my respect. He understodd the role and gave terrific performances.

Angelina Jolie and her Russian accent was TERRIBLE, as was the effeminete "gay" scenes. Homoeroticism in Greece was carried out with aquite a manly appearance. Macedonians especially, were what one would consider "macho" and clan-like, warrior-type, men. Even in these homoerotic relationships the way it was carried out wasn't as was portrayed by Oliver Stone who BTW is a superb craftsman IMO.

As regards to strategy, Gaugamela was perfect-just too short. The arial view showing the phalanx formations, and the oblique order, Alexander's right feint and then his cutting back and charging straight at the Persian center that he managed to thin out by drawing their cavalry to their left flank was AWESOMELY protrayed IMO. It really gave me a better understanding of just how the tactic worked.

Hydaspes was beautiful from a dramatic and cinematic point of view. The contrasty colours, the scene of AtG charging straight into the Indian infantry and slashing everything in his path, the movie's best scene where AtG and Bucephalus face Porus and his elephant...Even the aetherial infra-red shots, with the King being carried in his shield and seeing his mate and his horse down...

I could on and on...I loved the film...