In the Economist Intelligence Unit’s latest annual survey of 127 of the world’s most liveable cities Canada takes three of the top ten spots, with Vancouver coming in at first for the the fourth consecutive year.
Here are the EIU’s top ten:
- Vancouver
- Melbourne
- Vienna
- Geneva
- Perth
- Adelaide
- Sydney
- Zurich
- Toronto
- Calgary
Way to go Vancouver! But I can’t believe Calgary is in there… Calgary is a total hole in my opinion, and should be rated amongst the next set, 10 hardest cities to live in:
- Tehran
- Douala
- Harare
- Abidjan
- Phnom Penh
- Lagos
- Karachi
- Dhaka
- Algiers
- Port Moresby
No surprise about PNG coming in last. It is one of the most overlooked dangerous places. I wonder where Newark ranks?

Comments to this entry
Curzon
October 4, 2005
2:51 pm
Alas, Newark, despite a general improving environment, remains in the top ten for violent crime and homicide. For murder it ranks below Oakland, St. Louis, New Orleans, and Washington D.C...
Mutantfrog
October 4, 2005
4:46 pm
Curzon
October 4, 2005
5:14 pm
Dan
October 4, 2005
6:32 pm
Under the Lee Despotism, the common Singaporeans must live in underwater caves, breathing only through communal snorkles.
Or at least, such is a great way to rile up Singaporeans ;)
Joe
October 5, 2005
12:24 am
I could see how Tokyo could slip out of the top 10 easily. It's a great place to be if you don't mind the Japanese lifestyle. If you want to live like an American/Canadian/Australian there... well, best be very wealthy, or on a military base.
Also: no good beaches, no good bagels, a surplus of totally insane people.
But we can still like it a lot.
Curzon
October 5, 2005
1:06 am
Matt
October 5, 2005
2:50 am
Matt
October 5, 2005
2:59 am
Tokyo is a fantastic place, but man....a stroll in Shibuya or Roppongi at night lends a fair bit of legitimacy to Joe's point.
Curzon
October 5, 2005
3:12 am
1ä½Â?ãÂ?¯ãƒÂ?ン㔚¯ãƒ¼ãƒÂ?ー ä½Â?ãÂ?¿ã”š”žÃ£Â?™ãÂ?”¢Ã¨ÂªÂ¿Ã¦Å¸Â»Ã£â‚¬Â?æÂ?±äº¬ï¼”˜Ã¯Â¼”“ä½Â?
ã€Â?ãƒÂンピ°Ã£Æ’³ï¼”¢Ã¦—¥å”¦Â±Ã¥Â?Œã€”˜Ã¨”¹Â±Ã£”šÂ¨Ã£”šÂ³Ã£Æ’ŽãƒŸã”šÂ¹Ã£Æ’ˆèªŒç³»ãÂ?®èª¿æŸ»æ©Ÿé”“¢ï¼¥ï¼©ï¼µãÂ?Œä¸”“產ŒãÂ?®ï¼”˜Ã¯Â¼'ï¼—都帔šÃ£”š'対象ãÂ?«ãÂ?“ãÂ?®ãÂ?ȋÂ?©å®Ÿæ”“½ãÂ?—ãÂ?Ÿã€Œä½Â?ãÂ?¿ã”š”žÃ£Â?™ãÂ?”¢Ã£â‚¬Â?調査ãÂ?§ã€Â?㔚«ãƒŠãƒ€ãÂ?®ãƒÂ?ン㔚¯ãƒ¼ãƒÂ?ーãÂ?Œï¼”˜Ã¤Â½Â?ãÂ?«ãÂ?ªãÂ?£ãÂ?Ÿã€”šÃ¦Â?±äº¬ãÂ?¯ãƒ”˜Ã£Æ’ªã€Â?モントリ㔚ªãƒ¼ãƒ«ï¼ˆã”šÂ«Ã£Æ’Šãƒ€ï¼”°Ã£â‚¬Â?ãƒÂ?ンピ“ル㔚¯ï¼ˆãƒ”°Ã£”šÂ¤Ã£Æ’”žÃ¯Â¼”°Ã£Â?¨ä¸¦ã”š“ãÂ?§ï¼”˜Ã¯Â¼”“ä½Â?ã€Â?大阪・神戸ãÂ?¯ãƒ™ãƒ«ãƒªãƒ³ãÂ?ªãÂ?©ï¼”¢Ã©Æ’½å¸”šÃ£Â?¨ãÂ?¨ã”š”šÃ£Â?«ï¼'ï¼Â?ä½Â?ãÂ? ãÂ?£ãÂ?Ÿã€”š
調査ãÂ?¯ç'°å¢ƒã”š”žÃ¦”“”¡Ã¥Å’”“ã€Â?攢™è”šÂ²Ã£â‚¬Â?医ç™”šÃ£Â?ªãÂ?©ãÂ?®éÂ?¢ãÂ?”¹Ã£”š”°Ã§”?Ÿæ´»æÂ?¡ä»¶ã”š'刔 æžÂ?〔šÃ£Æ’¢ãƒŽã”š”žÃ£”šÂµÃ£Æ’¼ãƒ“㔚¹ã€Â?社会基町¤ãÂ?Å’Ã¥”¦”¦Ã¥Â®Å¸Ã£Â?—ã€Â?Ã¥Â?±é™ºãÂ?ªç”ºÂ®Ã£Â?«éÂ?ÂãÂ?” æÂ?Â?㔚ŒãÂ?Œå°”˜Ã£Â?ªãÂ?”žÃ£Â?¨è©”¢Ã¤Â¾Â¡Ã£Â?”¢Ã£”šÅ’ãÂ?Ÿã”šÂ«Ã£Æ’Šãƒ€ã”š”žÃ£”šÂªÃ£Æ’¼ã”šÂ¹Ã£Æ’ˆãƒ©ãƒªã”šÂ¢Ã£â‚¬Â?㔚¹ã”šÂ¤Ã£”šÂ¹Ã£â‚¬Â?㔚ªãƒ¼ã”šÂ¹Ã£Æ’ˆãƒªã”šÂ¢Ã£Â?®éƒ½å¸”šÃ£Â?Œä¸Šä½Â?㔚'Ã¥Â? ã”šÂ?ãÂ?Ÿã€”šÃ¨ÂªÂ¿Ã¦Å¸Â»Ã¦”¹”¦Ã¥Â½“耔¦Ã£Â?¯ã€Â?çÂ?¾åœ¨ãÂ?®ä¸”“產Œ惔¦Ã¥”¹Â¢Ã£”š'考ãÂ?ˆã”š”¹Ã£Â?¨ã€Â?ピ ãƒÂãÂ?®åÂ?±é™ºãÂ?Œå°”˜Ã£Â?ªãÂ?”žÃ©Æ’½å¸”šÃ£Â?Œå¥½ãÂ?¾ãÂ?—ãÂ?”žÃ£Â?¨èª¬æ˜ŽãÂ?—ãÂ?¦ãÂ?”žÃ£”š”¹Ã£â‚¬”š
日本㔚”žÃ©Å¸“Ã¥”ºÂ½Ã£â‚¬Â?㔚·ãƒ³ã”šÂ¬Ã£Æ’Â?ールãÂ?ªãÂ?©ãÂ?®éƒ½å¸”šÃ£Â?¯ç·Â?ãÂ?˜ãÂ?¦ç”?Ÿæ´»æ°´æº”“ãÂ?¯è”°Â¯Ã¥Â¥Â½Ã£Â?¨ãÂ?”¢Ã£”šÅ’ãÂ?ŸãÂ?Œã€Â?湿æ°—ãÂ?®å¤šãÂ?”žÃ¦Â°—候ãÂ?΋”š”žÃ£”š”žÃ¨Â©”¢Ã¤Â¾Â¡Ã£”š'且¹Ã£Â?'ãÂ?Ÿã€”š
For you none-Japanese speakers -- Japan, South Korea, and Singapore were hurt not by the lifestyle available, but by... THE &%$# WEATHER!!
Curzon
October 5, 2005
3:29 am
Simon
October 5, 2005
3:48 am
Joe
October 5, 2005
5:45 am
Joe
October 5, 2005
5:50 am
Matt
October 5, 2005
7:27 am
lirelou
October 5, 2005
8:07 am
RichL
October 6, 2005
2:20 am
Mutantfrog
October 6, 2005
4:08 pm
Maybe this helps explain why Osaka is on the list?
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Pacific Island Forum Meets
October 25, 2005
4:07 am
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Big Trouble in the South Pacific
December 1, 2006
5:20 am