
A new activist movement named “Antisoros” has arisen in Georgia, taking on international philanthropist George Soros.
from Mosnews
“The objective of the organization is to determine the projects that are financed by George Soros and that are undermining Georgian national traditions and are, in essence, anti-national,”Â? reads a newsletter circulated by the Antisoros founders.
Soros is a very controversial fellow, in 2003 he said that removing Bush from office was the “central focus of my life” and “a matter of life and death.” He also contributed $5M to MoveOn.org.
Independent forensic expert Maya Nikoleishvili is poised to become the chairwoman of the new movement. Nikoleishvili is known for publicly questioning the official version of the death of Georgian prime minister Zurab Zvcania, who, according to the authorities, died of carbon monoxide poisoning this February, soon after pro-western president Mikhail Saakashvili came to power.
Is this related to Soros? Antisoros hasn’t made any outright claims yet (they don’t have a website out yet, at least not in English, Russian or Georgian) but Soros has been previously accused of being at the center of a web of other conspiracy theories, and I think that is just what is motivating this new Georgian group.
One good thing about Soros’ penchant for throwing cash about is Eurasianet.org which is a great resource for those interested in Central Asian/Caucasus affairs.

Comments to this entry
Kenneth
October 3, 2005
8:57 pm
Curzon
October 3, 2005
9:03 pm
Nathan
October 3, 2005
9:45 pm
And along those lines, I think that some of what his largesse has wrought in and related to the former USSR is going downhill. (I say this as someone who strongly supports the work of OSI despite not liking the man too much.) Sure, there's been an assault on OSI in some countries in the region, but I also think the man 's interest dipped during 2004 while he focused on the US election. I can't prove it of course, but I at least partially assumed that the reason why Eurasianet kind of sucked for a while is because Soros's attention was elsewhere. Thankfully I think the site's improving again to the point that I'm occasionally disappointed when I miss something/delighted to see something worth reading. (No RSS though? Come on, what is this, 2002?)
R. Elgin
October 4, 2005
2:23 am
Younghusband
October 4, 2005
11:52 am
Nathan
October 5, 2005
1:34 am